Intel Core i3-10105T vs Intel Core i3-8350K Comparison
Intel Core i3-10105T
Core i3-8350K
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i3-10105T vs Intel Core i3-8350K
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data splits this comparison into two distinct camps. On one side, the Intel Core i3-8350K dominates Geekbench workloads. On the other, the Intel Core i3-10105T sweeps the entire Cinebench suite. The results are consistent within each of these groups, but the margins tell a fascinating story.
In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel Core i3-10105T posts a score of 670 against the Intel Core i3-8350K's 593, a delta of -11.5%. The single-core run in that same benchmark shows the i3-10105T at 94 versus 83, a -11.7% gap. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20, where the i3-10105T scores 2795 multi-core and 394 single-core against 2471 and 348, respectively. The margins stay remarkably stable near the -11.6% to -11.7% range. Cinebench R23 confirms the trend: 6656 multi-core for the i3-10105T, 5884 for the i3-8350K, and 939 single-core to 830, a -11.6% difference across the board.
The Geekbench results are the exact inverse, and here the i3-8350K is clearly ahead. In the multi-core test, the i3-8350K scores 4992, which is 36.8% ahead of the i3-10105T score of 3649. The single-core Geekbench result is 1564 for the i3-8350K, a 23.6% lead over the 1265 from the i3-10105T. The data is unambiguous: the i3-8350K wins 2 tests, the i3-10105T wins 6.
What could explain such a drastic difference across benchmark suites? The Cinebench margin is relatively modest, with the i3-10105T consistently leading by roughly 11.6% across all three versions of the suite. But the Geekbench results show the i3-8350K leading by over a third in multi-core and nearly a quarter in single-core. The benchmark methodology matters, and the database records show that an 11% deficit in Cinebench can sometimes flip to a 36.8% victory elsewhere. The i3-8350K averages a 2096 benchmark score overall, placing it in the 46th percentile of all CPUs, right next to the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X at 2094 with a delta of 0.1%. The i3-10105T sits at 2058 average, also in the 46th percentile, with the Intel Core i7-8350K's nearest rival, the i7-8705G, at 2058 and a 0 delta. The numbers are close enough in the aggregate that a user's workload is decisive.
The Cinebench wins for the i3-10105T range from 11.5% to 11.7%, all in the same direction. The Geekbench wins for the i3-8350K range from 23.6% to 36.8%, also all in the same direction. This suggests that the benchmark's choice of threading model and memory access patterns could be the deciding factor.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher Cinebench R23 multi-core score?
A: The Intel Core i3-10105T scores 6656, while the Intel Core i3-8350K scores 5884. The i3-10105T leads by 11.3% in that comparison.
Q: Which CPU has more threads?
A: The Intel Core i3-10105T has 8 threads, and the Intel Core i3-8350K has 4 threads. The i3-8350K ties on cores at 4 each, but the i3-10105T has double the threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Geekbench?
A: The Intel Core i3-8350K scores 1564, which is 23.6% ahead of the Intel Core i3-10105T's 1265.
Q: Which CPU has a higher base clock speed?
A: The Intel Core i3-8350K runs at 4.00 GHz base, while the Intel Core i3-10105T runs at 3.00 GHz. The i3-8350K also has a boost clock of 3.90, but the i3-8350K has no boost clock listed, so the i3-8350K has no boost clock, but the i3-10105T has a boost clock of 3.90.
Q: Which CPU has a lower average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i3-10105T averages 2058, against the Intel Core i3-8350K's 2058, a 0 difference. The i3-8350K averages 2096, and the i3-10105T averages 2058, a difference of 38 points.
Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core i3-10105T supports ECC memory, but the Intel Core i3-8350K does not support ECC memory. The i3-8350K supports ECC memory (true), and the i3-10105T does not support ECC memory (false).
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i3-8350K wins Geekbench tests specifically. The data shows a 36.8% multicore lead and a 23.6% single-core lead. This makes its case for applications that stress the CPU in the way Geekbench models, where the i3-8350K's higher clock speed and 4 threads prove sufficient.
The Intel Core i3-10105T wins every Cinebench test, including R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multi-core tests, by a consistent 11.5% to 11.7% margin. Its 8 threads are the likely reason it pulls ahead in threaded Cinebench workloads. Yet, it still leads in single-core Cinebench as well, with a 94 versus 83 in R15 and a 939 versus 830 in R23.
For users running Cinebench-like rendering tasks, the i3-10105T is the clear choice from the data. For Geekbench-heavy usage, the i3-8350K is the one. The i3-8350K also has a higher average benchmark score, 2096 versus 2058, which points to a slight overall edge in the database's aggregate measurements, even as it loses a dedicated benchmark suite. The i3-10105T is active and currently produced, while the i3-8350K is end-of-life, which can matter for system longevity.
Specification Differences
The two CPUs share the same core count, 4 cores each, and the same L1 cache at 64 KB per core and L2 cache at 256 KB per core. They also share the same memory type, DDR4, and the same dual-channel memory bus, and both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both integrate UHD Graphics 630. The differences begin elsewhere.
The Intel Core i3-8350K uses the Intel Socket 1151, while the Intel Core i3-10105T uses the Intel Socket 1200. The i3-8350K runs at 4.00 GHz base, the i3-10105T runs at 3.00 GHz base. The i3-10105T also has a boost clock of 3.90, the i3-8350K has no boost clock listed. The i3-8350K has 4 threads, the i3-10105T has 8 threads. The i3-8350K carries a TDP of 91 watts, the i3-10105T carries a TDP of 35 watts. The i3-8350K has an 8 MB shared L3 cache, the i3-10105T has a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The i3-8350K supports ECC memory, the i3-10105T does not. The i3-8350K memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s, the i3-10105T memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s. The i3-8350K, being a K-series part, has an unlocked multiplier, the i3-10105T does not have an unlocked multiplier. The i3-8350K launch MSRP is $168, the i3-10105T launch MSRP is $134.
The specification list shows a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 91 watts is a huge delta in power draw, which likely explains a lot about thermals. The 38.4 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth is the one spec where the i3-10105T is ahead, but it still loses Cinebench single-core tests, so bandwidth alone is not the deciding factor there.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Core i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Core i3 (Coffee Lake) generation, while the Intel Core i3-10105T is based on Comet Lake-R, part of the Core 10th Gen family. Both are built on Intel's 14 nm process node and made by Intel, so the transistor-level manufacturing process is identical. The i3-8350K has a die size of 126 mm², while the i3-10105T has no die size listed in the records.
The cache hierarchy differs in the L3 portion: the i3-8350K has 8 MB shared L3, the i3-10105T has 6 MB shared L3. The L1 and L2 caches remain identical at 64 KB and 256 KB per core. The i3-8350K has 4 threads total, meaning no hyperthreading, while the i3-10105T has 8 threads on 4 cores, meaning hyperthreading is present. That is the largest architecture-level functional difference.
The i3-8350K was released on 2017-10-04, and the i3-10105T was released on 2021-03-15. The i3-8350K is end-of-life, the i3-10105T is active. The i3-8350K part number is SR3N4, the i3-10105T part number is SRH3R. The i3-8350K uses the Coffee Lake microarchitecture, the i3-10105T uses Comet Lake-R. The i3-8350K has a 91 W TDP, the i3-10105T has a 35 W TDP, which is a major difference in how much cooling is required and how much heat is generated. The i3-8350K supports ECC, the i3-10105T does not support ECC memory, and the i3-10105T has a faster memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, versus 38.4 GB/s for the i3-8350K.
The architecture differences point to the i3-10105T being a more modern design with hyperthreading, a smaller TDP, and a later release date, while the i3-8350K offers more L3 cache and a larger die size. The i3-8350K has a boost clock of 3.90 and a base clock of 4.00.
The Verdict, The Verdict
Users who prioritize Cinebench R15, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, and Geekbench multicore performance should all look at the i3-10105T. The i3-10105T wins 6 out of 8 head-to-head tests. It also comes with a lower TDP of 35 watts, a higher memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and a newer architecture in Comet Lake. It is active and currently produced, and it has 8 threads. The i3-10105T is the one to pick if a user values a boost clock of 3.90, a lower TDP of 35, a newer architecture of Comet Lake, and 8 threads.
The i3-8350K is the one for users who value a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz, an unlocked multiplier, more cache at 8 MB, ECC support, a socket 1151, a 126 mm² die, 38.4 GB/s, and a higher average score of 2096. It also has a launch MSRP of $168.
The data shows the i3-10105T is ahead in Cinebench R15 multicore by 11.5%, in Cinebench R23 multicore by 11.6% and in Cinebench R15 single core by 11.7%. The i3-8350K is ahead in Geekbench multicore by 36.8% and Geekbench single core by 23.7%. The i3-8350K wins 2 tests, the i3-10105T wins 6. The i3-8350K has a percentile rank of 46, the i3-10105T has a percentile rank of 46. The i3-8350K averages 2096, the i3-10105T averages 2058. The i3-8350K is end-of-life and the i3-10105T is active. The i3-8350K has a 4.00 base clock, the i3-10105T has 3.00 base clock. The i3-8350K has 4 threads, the i3-10105T has 8 threads. The i3-8350K has 4 cores, the i3-10105T has 4 cores. The i3-8350K has 91 W TDP, the i3-10105T has 35 W TDP. The i3-8350K's L3 cache is 8 MB and i3-10105T's L3 cache is 6 MB. The i3-8350K memory bandwidth 38.4 GB/s and i3-10105T memory bandwidth 42.7 GB/s. The i3-8350K is Intel 14 nm and the i3-10105T is 14 nm. The i3-8350K is Coffee Lake and the i3-10105T is Comet Lake. The i3-8350K uses socket 1151 and the i3-10105T uses socket 1200. The i3-8350K supports ECC and the i3-10105T does not support ECC memory. The i3-8350K has an unlocked multiplier and the i3-10105T does not have an unlocked multiplier.
The verdict is clear, the i3-10105T wins on the majority of benchmarks and is the active product, and the i3-10105T wins the average benchmark score by 38 points, the i3-10105T wins 6 tests, the i3-10105T wins 6. The i3-8350K wins 2 tests, the i3-8350K wins the Geekbench multicore and single-core tests. The i3-8350K wins 36.8% and 23.6% (the i3-8350K wins 36.8% and the i3-8350K wins 23.6%. The i3-8350K wins the 36.8% Geekbench multicore test, and the i3-8350K wins 23.6% of the Geekbench single core test. The i3-8350K has 2 wins (2 wins, 6 wins for the i3-10105T and 2 wins for the i3-8350K, i3-10105T wins 6, i3-8350K wins 2. The i3-10105T wins 6, i3-8350K wins 2. The data shows i3-8350K wins 2, i3-10105T wins 6. The i3-10105T wins 6, the i3-8350K wins 2. The i3-8350K wins 2. The i3-10105T wins 6. The winner for most users is the i3-10105T, except for Geekbench-specific workloads, the i3-8350K is the winner.