Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PTE and Intel Core Ultra 5 236V target completely different segments, and the benchmark data confirms a stark performance split. The Core 9 273PTE wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, dominating multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads, while the Core Ultra 5 236V claims only 3 wins, but those wins are in specific single-thread and prime-number tasks. The data shows that the Core 9 273PTE is the clear performance leader, while the Core Ultra 5 236V offers a more efficient, mobile-oriented design with a few notable strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PTE is the undisputed champion in almost every category that matters for desktop productivity and content creation. Its wins span all Cinebench versions, both single-core and multi-core, with deltas consistently around 30.8%. In PassMark tests, it wins data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating point math, integer math, multithreading, physics, and random string sorting. The largest margin comes in integer math, where the Core 9 273PTE scores 82411 versus 38765, a 112.6% advantage. This indicates a massive lead in general arithmetic and logic operations, making it the obvious choice for compilation, spreadsheet work, and database tasks.

The Core Ultra 5 236V wins only three tests: PassMark find prime numbers (171 vs 142, a 17% lead), PassMark single thread (3893 vs 3433, an 11.8% lead), and the duplicate single-thread entry. The prime number test is a specific workload that favors its architecture, while the single-thread win suggests better per-core efficiency in certain integer-heavy single-threaded tasks. However, these wins do not offset the Core 9 273PTE's dominance elsewhere. The Core Ultra 5 236V also wins the PassMark extended instructions test by a narrow 3.2% margin, but that is not counted in its win total because the Core 9 273PTE actually scores higher (15952 vs 15451). The data indicates that the Core Ultra 5 236V is not a general-purpose performance part; it is a specialized mobile chip with a few isolated strengths.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive result in the entire comparison is the Cinebench R20 multicore test, where the Core 9 273PTE scores 8586 against 6563, a 30.8% lead. This pattern repeats across all Cinebench versions: R15 multicore (2060 vs 1575, 30.8%), R23 multicore (20445 vs 15628, 30.8%), and even single-core tests like R23 single (2886 vs 2206, 30.8%). The consistency of the 30.8% delta across all Cinebench tests suggests a fundamental architectural advantage in both core count and clock speed, not just a workload-specific quirk.

In PassMark multithread, the Core 9 273PTE scores 24054 versus 18375, a 30.9% lead, which aligns with the Cinebench results. The integer math test is the outlier, with the Core 9 273PTE more than doubling the Core Ultra 5 236V's score (82411 vs 38765, 112.6%). Data compression also shows a large gap: 258704 vs 176554, a 46.5% lead. These are the two biggest wins for the Core 9 273PTE, highlighting its strength in memory-heavy and arithmetic-intensive operations.

The Core Ultra 5 236V's wins are narrower but real. In PassMark find prime numbers, it leads 171 to 142, a 17% advantage. In single-thread tests, it scores 3893 versus 3433, an 11.8% lead. These results indicate that the Core Ultra 5 236V has a more efficient single-core design for certain calculations, but the Core 9 273PTE still wins the single-core Cinebench tests by 30.8%. The data shows that the Core Ultra 5 236V's single-thread advantage is limited to PassMark's specific methodology, not general single-core performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process. This explains the Core Ultra 5 236V's lower power draw, but it does not translate into performance wins. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, compared to 8 cores and 8 threads on the Core Ultra 5 236V. The Core 9 273PTE also has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 4.70 GHz, and its base clock is 1.40 GHz versus 2.10 GHz.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Core 9 273PTE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 236V has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, but only 8 MB shared L3. The Core 9 273PTE's larger L3 cache is a likely factor in its data compression and integer math wins. The Core 9 273PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 236V's memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with dual-channel bus but no recorded bandwidth. The Core 9 273PTE also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 236V supports PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 lanes. The Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses Intel BGA 2833.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 9 273PTE has UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 236V has Arc 130V. The Core 9 273PTE is a desktop part with a 45 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 5 236V is a mobile part with a 17 W TDP. The Core Ultra 5 236V was released on 2024-09-23, while the Core 9 273PTE has a launch date of 2026-03-08. The Core 9 273PTE has a launch MSRP of $549, while no MSRP is recorded for the Core Ultra 5 236V.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference according to PassMark?

A: The Core Ultra 5 236V wins the PassMark single-thread test with 3893 points versus 3433 for the Core 9 273PTE, an 11.8% lead.

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 versus 15628 for the Core Ultra 5 236V, a 30.8% advantage.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has a 45 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 5 236V has a 17 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB shared L3, while the Core Ultra 5 236V has 8 MB shared L3.

Q: What are the process nodes for the two processors?

A: The Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm Intel process, while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses a 3 nm TSMC process.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the superior processor for nearly all workloads. It wins 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from 3.2% in extended instructions to 112.6% in integer math. Its Cinebench dominance at a consistent 30.8% delta across all versions indicates a broad, reliable performance advantage. The Core 9 273PTE also holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to the Core Ultra 5 236V's 75th percentile. Its average benchmark score of 31143 versus 21952 further confirms its higher overall performance tier.

The Core Ultra 5 236V is not without merit. Its 17 W TDP and 3 nm TSMC process make it a power-efficient mobile option, and its PassMark single-thread win (3893 vs 3433) and prime number test win (171 vs 142) show it has specialized capabilities. However, these are narrow victories in a small subset of tests. The Core Ultra 5 236V's nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 5 238V with a delta of -0.1% and the Core i7-11700F with a delta of -0.2%, placing it in a lower performance class than the Core 9 273PTE, whose nearest rivals include the Core i7-12700F at 0.2% and the Ryzen 9 8945HS at 0.2%.

For desktop users who need maximum compute throughput, the Core 9 273PTE is the clear choice. For mobile users who prioritize efficiency and specific single-thread tasks, the Core Ultra 5 236V makes sense, but the data shows it cannot match the Core 9 273PTE in general performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PTE | Intel Core Ultra 5 236V |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 1.40 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 17 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | Depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc 130V |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-09-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $549 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SA4QJ | SRPN2SRPN3 |