Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 9 273PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.4 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225F

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,060
2,660
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
290
287
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
8,586
11,059
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,212
1,561
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
20,445
16,467
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,886
1,893
passmark_data_compression
258,704
310,843
passmark_data_encryption
14,253
22,648
passmark_extended_instructions
15,952
28,027
passmark_find_prime_numbers
142
352
passmark_floating_point_math
60,673
92,554
passmark_integer_math
82,411
66,417
passmark_multithread
24,054
31,004
passmark_physics
1,917
2,430
passmark_random_string_sorting
28,973
37,325
passmark_single_thread
3,433
4,397
passmark_singlethread
3,433
4,397

Analysis: Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

Intel Core 9 273PTE and Intel Core Ultra 5 225F target different desktop priorities. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 225F wins 13 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Core 9 273PTE claims 4 wins. The Core 9 273PTE uses the LGA1700 platform with DDR4 and DDR5 support, while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 with DDR5 only. The Core 9 273PTE carries a launch MSRP of $549, and the Core Ultra 5 225F carries a launch MSRP of $231.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F dominates throughput-heavy workloads. It leads in Cinebench R15 multicore by 22.6%, Cinebench R20 multicore by 22.4%, and PassMark multithread by 22.4%. Data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread tests all go to the Core Ultra 5 225F. This processor also wins Cinebench R20 single-core by 22.4%.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins a narrower set of scenarios. It takes Cinebench R23 multicore by 24.2%, Cinebench R23 single-core by 52.5%, PassMark integer math by 24.1%, and Cinebench R15 single-core by 1%. The R23 single-core margin is the largest of any head-to-head result, making that workload the clearest strength for the Core 9 273PTE.

The split suggests the Core Ultra 5 225F is the better general-purpose performer across most measured tasks, while the Core 9 273PTE holds specific advantages in integer math and the R23 rendering suite. The Core 9 273PTE also posts a higher Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20445 versus 16467, its best win in that test.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel designs. The Core 9 273PTE uses Bartlett Lake on a 10 nm node fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S on a 3 nm node fabricated by TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 225F has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die; the Core 9 273PTE does not have transistor or die size data recorded.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Core 9 273PTE offers simultaneous multithreading, and the Core Ultra 5 225F does not. Cache layouts also differ: the Core 9 273PTE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 225F has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3.

Clock behavior diverges. The Core 9 273PTE has a 1.40 GHz base clock and a 5.50 GHz boost clock. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a 3.30 GHz base clock and a 4.90 GHz boost clock. The Core 9 273PTE has a 45 W TDP, and the Core Ultra 5 225F has a 65 W TDP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Platform support differs. The Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, supports DDR4 and DDR5, and has dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 225F uses Intel Socket 1851, supports DDR5 only, and has dual-channel memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory; the Core Ultra 5 225F does not. The Core 9 273PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and the Core Ultra 5 225F provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics.

The Core Ultra 5 225F belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, released on 2025-01-06. The Core 9 273PTE belongs to the Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) generation, released on 2026-03-08. Both are active production desktop parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core Ultra 5 225F wins the multicore Cinebench tests by identical margins. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 2660 versus 2060, a 22.6% lead. In Cinebench R20 multicore, it scores 11059 versus 8586, a 22.4% lead. The single-core R20 result also favors the Core Ultra 5 225F, 1561 versus 1212, a 22.4% margin.

The Core 9 273PTE reverses the trend in Cinebench R23. It scores 20445 versus 16467 in multicore, a 24.2% win. Its R23 single-core score of 2886 versus 1893 is a 52.5% advantage, the largest delta in the comparison. The Core 9 273PTE also wins Cinebench R15 single-core, 290 versus 287, by 1%.

PassMark results heavily favor the Core Ultra 5 225F. Data compression shows 310843 versus 258704, a 16.8% lead. Data encryption shows 22648 versus 14253, a 37.1% lead. Extended instructions show 28027 versus 15952, a 43.1% lead. Prime number finding shows 352 versus 142, a 59.7% lead. Floating point math shows 92554 versus 60673, a 34.4% lead. Multithread shows 31004 versus 24054, a 22.4% lead. Physics shows 2430 versus 1917, a 21.1% lead. Random string sorting shows 37325 versus 28973, a 22.4% lead. Single-thread shows 4397 versus 3433, a 21.9% lead.

The Core 9 273PTE wins PassMark integer math, 82411 versus 66417, a 24.1% margin. That is its only PassMark win.

Average benchmark scores put the Core Ultra 5 225F ahead at 37313 versus 31143 for the Core 9 273PTE. The Core Ultra 5 225F ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the Core 9 273PTE ranks in the 82nd percentile. The Core Ultra 5 225F's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900HK with an average score of 37425 and a delta of -0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 with a delta of 0.4%, the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 with a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 with a delta of 0.5%. The Core 9 273PTE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 with a delta of 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 with a delta of 0.4%, and the Intel Core i7-12650HX at 31290 with a delta of -0.5%.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is the stronger processor for most workloads. It wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, including all PassMark categories except integer math, plus Cinebench R15 multicore, R20 multicore, and R20 single-core. Its average benchmark score of 37313 sits 19.8% above the Core 9 273PTE's 31143. Its 85th percentile ranking versus 82nd also supports that position.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the better choice when Cinebench R23 rendering or integer math matters. Its R23 multicore lead of 24.2% and R23 single-core lead of 52.5% are decisive. Its integer math win of 24.1% adds another specific strength. The Core 9 273PTE also offers ECC memory support and integrated graphics, which the Core Ultra 5 225F lacks, plus DDR4 compatibility for older platforms.

The Core Ultra 5 225F counters with a faster memory bus at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s and more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16. The Core Ultra 5 225F also has a higher base clock, 3.30 GHz versus 1.40 GHz, and a smaller manufacturing node, 3 nm versus 10 nm. The Core 9 273PTE has a higher boost clock, 5.50 GHz versus 4.90 GHz.

Users on the LGA1700 platform with DDR4 memory would find the Core 9 273PTE more compatible. Users building on LGA1851 with DDR5 would prefer the Core Ultra 5 225F based on its broader benchmark dominance. The Core 9 273PTE suits workflows centered on R23 rendering and integer operations, while the Core Ultra 5 225F suits everything from compression and encryption to floating point and single-thread tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F wins 13 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks. The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins 4.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE leads by 52.5% in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2886 versus 1893.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F does not support ECC memory.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has an average benchmark score of 37313. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has an average benchmark score of 31143.

Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 273PTE
Ultra 5 225F
Core Specs
Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Threads
24
10 -58.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.4
3.3 +135.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.9 -10.9%
Frequency (GHz)
1.4
3.3 +135.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.9 -10.9%
Multiplier
14
33 +135.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
36 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
65 +44.4%
PL1
45 W
65 W
PL2
219 W
121 W
Architecture
Architecture
Arrow Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core 9 (Bartlett Lake)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
17,800 million
Die Size
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2.7 GHz up to 4.4 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$549
$231
Part Number
SA4QJ
SRQD2SRVF9
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core 9 273PTE Details View Core Ultra 5 225F Details