Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core i9-14900HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear overall picture: the Intel Core i9-14900HX wins 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, with the Intel Core 9 273PTE securing a single victory. The margin of victory for the i9-14900HX is substantial in most multi-threaded workloads, while the Core 9 273PTE shows its strength in one specific single-threaded test.

The largest gap appears in PassMark data encryption. The i9-14900HX scores 32619 against 14253 for the Core 9 273PTE, a delta of -56.3% from the Core 9's perspective. Data compression shows a similar pattern, with the i9-14900HX at 539965 versus 258704, a -52.1% delta. Random string sorting also favors the i9-14900HX heavily, 60861 against 28973, a -52.4% difference. These results indicate that the i9-14900HX handles encryption, compression, and sorting workloads with considerably more throughput.

Cinebench multi-core results reinforce this trend. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i9-14900HX scores 4574 against 2060, a -55% delta. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 15616 versus 8586, a -45% delta, and Cinebench R23 multi-core records 30055 versus 20445, a -32% delta. The PassMark multi-thread test follows, with the i9-14900HX at 43778 and the Core 9 273PTE at 24054, a -45.1% delta. Integer math and floating point math also favor the i9-14900HX by wide margins, with 157375 versus 82411 (-47.6%) and 112273 versus 60673 (-46%) respectively.

The single exception comes in Cinebench R23 single-core. Here the Core 9 273PTE scores 2886 against 2181.5 for the i9-14900HX, a +32.3% advantage. This is a notable result because it is the only test where the Core 9 273PTE leads. However, other single-threaded tests do not follow this pattern. Cinebench R15 single-core gives the i9-14900HX a narrow win, 310.5 versus 290, a -6.6% delta. Cinebench R20 single-core shows a larger gap, 2204 versus 1212, a -45% delta. PassMark single-thread also favors the i9-14900HX, 4175 versus 3433, a -17.8% delta.

The average benchmark score tells the same story. The i9-14900HX averages 56004, while the Core 9 273PTE averages 31143. The i9-14900HX sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 82nd percentile for the Core 9 273PTE. The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PTE include the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 (delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 31074 (delta 0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (delta 0.4%). The i9-14900HX, by contrast, sits near the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 at 56273 (delta -0.5%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 at 56306 (delta -0.5%). These rival clusters highlight how far apart the two compared processors are in overall measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14900HX dominates across nearly every workload category in the database. Multi-threaded rendering, as measured by Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, goes decisively to the i9-14900HX. The same applies to PassMark integer math, floating point math, extended instructions, data compression, data encryption, random string sorting, find prime numbers, physics, and multi-thread tests. For users running heavy parallel workloads, the data shows the i9-14900HX delivers roughly 32% to 56% more performance depending on the specific task.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins exactly one recorded benchmark: Cinebench R23 single-core, where it leads by 32.3%. This suggests that in a narrowly defined single-threaded rendering scenario, the Core 9 273PTE has an edge. However, other single-threaded tests contradict this result. The i9-14900HX wins Cinebench R15 single-core, Cinebench R20 single-core, and PassMark single-thread. The Core 9 273PTE also trails in PassMark extended instructions, scoring 15952 against 31247, which indicates that even instruction-heavy single-thread workloads generally favor the i9-14900HX.

In practical terms, the i9-14900HX is the stronger choice for multi-core productivity, content creation, and data-heavy tasks. The Core 9 273PTE offers a single bright spot in one Cinebench R23 configuration, but the surrounding data does not support a broader single-threaded advantage. The percentile rankings reinforce this: the i9-14900HX at the 91st percentile versus the Core 9 273PTE at the 82nd percentile places them in different performance tiers.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core configuration. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads. This core and thread gap explains much of the multi-threaded performance difference. The base clock also differs: the Core 9 273PTE runs at 1.40 GHz, while the i9-14900HX runs at 2.20 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the Core 9 273PTE reaching 5.50 GHz and the i9-14900HX reaching 5.80 GHz.

The process node is listed as 10 nm for both, and both use Intel as the foundry. Cache configurations match: both have 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support is also identical: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 9 273PTE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i9-14900HX has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory.

The socket and market segment differ. The Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop part. The i9-14900HX uses Intel BGA 1964 and is classified as mobile. The codenames also differ: Bartlett Lake for the Core 9 273PTE, Raptor Lake-HX for the i9-14900HX. The i9-14900HX is part of the Core 14th Gen series, while the Core 9 273PTE has no series listing. The i9-14900HX has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9 273PTE has no recorded die size.

Integrated graphics differ slightly. The Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i9-14900HX uses UHD Graphics 770. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked on the i9-14900HX but locked on the Core 9 273PTE. Release dates differ: the Core 9 273PTE was released on 2026-03-08, and the i9-14900HX on 2024-01-07. The i9-14900HX has a launch MSRP of $549, while the Core 9 273PTE has no launch MSRP recorded. The part numbers are SA4QJ for the Core 9 273PTE and SRMXF for the i9-14900HX.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor won the most head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX won 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks. The Intel Core 9 273PTE won one, specifically Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 30055 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445, a -32% delta for the Core 9 273PTE.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 9 273PTE and the Intel Core i9-14900HX support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has an average benchmark score of 31143, and the Intel Core i9-14900HX has an average benchmark score of 56004.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, compared to 5.50 GHz for the Intel Core 9 273PTE.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i9-14900HX for nearly all recorded workloads. Its 24 cores and 32 threads provide a substantial multi-threaded advantage, reflected in Cinebench multi-core results and PassMark multi-thread tests. Its higher base clock of 2.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz also contribute to strong single-threaded performance in most tests, with the exception of Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 9 273PTE leads by 32.3%.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE, with 12 cores and 24 threads, sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the i9-14900HX sits at the 91st percentile. The average benchmark scores of 31143 versus 56004 reinforce the performance hierarchy. The Core 9 273PTE belongs to a desktop platform with Socket 1700, while the i9-14900HX is a mobile part on BGA 1964. The i9-14900HX also offers an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Core 9 273PTE is locked.

For workloads that scale across cores, the i9-14900HX is the clear choice based on the recorded data. The Core 9 273PTE may appeal specifically to scenarios where its Cinebench R23 single-core result matters, but the broader single-threaded evidence does not consistently support it. The i9-14900HX also carries a recorded launch MSRP of $549, while the Core 9 273PTE has no recorded launch MSRP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PTE | Intel Core i9-14900HX |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 24 |

| Threads | 24 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 1.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 | 55 |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $549 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | true |

| Part Number | SA4QJ | SRMXF |

| Series | Not recorded | Core 14th Gen |