Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data presents a striking split between the two processors. The Intel Core i7-14650HX dominates the benchmark suite, winning 15 of 17 recorded tests, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE secures only 2 wins. The magnitude of the i7-14650HX’s victories is substantial in the multi-threaded workloads, but the Core 9 273PTE’s single-core results tell a different story.

The largest margin belongs to the i7-14650HX in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 3470.5 against the Core 9 273PTE’s 2060, a delta of -40.6% from the Core 9’s perspective. This is a near-identical pattern in Cinebench R20 multi-core, with the i7-14650HX at 11946 versus 8586, a -28.1% gap. The data compression test shows a similar trend: 398418 for the i7-14650HX versus 258704, a -35.1% difference. Data encryption also favors the i7-14650HX heavily, 22917 against 14253, a -37.8% margin.

The i7-14650HX extends its lead across Passmark’s math workloads. Integer math shows 116661 versus 82411, a -29.4% gap, while floating point math delivers 84999 versus 60673, a -28.6% difference. Extended instructions follow at 24150 versus 15952, a -33.9% margin. Random string sorting goes to the i7-14650HX with 43035 against 28973, a -32.7% gap. The multi-thread score confirms the trend: 33495 versus 24054, a -28.2% delta. Even the smaller wins matter, such as find prime numbers at 152 versus 142, a -6.6% gap, and physics at 2202 versus 1917, a -12.9% difference.

The Core 9 273PTE’s wins are narrow but telling. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 290 against 285.5, a 1.6% advantage. The decisive single-core victory comes in Cinebench R23, where the Core 9 273PTE records 2886 versus the i7-14650HX’s 1969, a 46.6% lead. This is the single largest delta in either direction, and it highlights a core-strength disparity that does not appear in other tests. Passmark single-thread, however, goes the other way: the i7-14650HX scores 3841 against 3433, a -10.6% gap, meaning the R23 result is an outlier relative to the rest of the data.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core result is a near dead heat: 20445 for the Core 9 273PTE versus 20454 for the i7-14650HX, a delta of 0%. This is the only test where the two processors effectively tie, and it contrasts sharply with the R15 and R20 multi-core results, where the i7-14650HX leads by 28-40%.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14650HX wins almost every throughput-oriented task. Its 16 cores versus 12 cores give it a clear structural advantage in parallel workloads. The data shows the i7-14650HX ahead in all Passmark multi-thread categories, including compression, encryption, integer math, floating point math, and extended instructions. It also leads in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core, which stress sustained all-core loads. For content creation, scientific computing, or any workload that scales with core count, the recorded data favors the i7-14650HX without exception.

The Core 9 273PTE wins only in specific single-thread scenarios. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2886 is 46.6% higher than the i7-14650HX’s 1969, which indicates a significant per-core clock advantage in that benchmark. The R15 single-core win, 290 versus 285.5, is marginal but consistent with a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. However, Passmark single-thread shows the opposite, with the i7-14650HX ahead by 10.6%. This suggests the Core 9 273PTE’s single-core advantage is benchmark-dependent, not universal.

For workloads that are lightly threaded and sensitive to peak clock speed, such as certain legacy applications or specific simulation tasks, the Core 9 273PTE may hold an edge in the R23 scenario. For everything else, the i7-14650HX is the performance leader. The wins tally, 15 to 2, leaves little ambiguity about which processor delivers higher aggregate performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several foundational traits but diverge in key structural areas. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel, and both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory support is present on both.

The core configuration is the most significant difference. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. This means the i7-14650HX has 4 more physical cores but the same thread count, indicating the Core 9 273PTE relies more on simultaneous multithreading to reach 24 threads, while the i7-14650HX has a higher physical core count with fewer threads per core.

Cache allocation differs as well. Both list L1 at 80 KB per core and L2 at 2 MB per core. The L3 cache, however, is larger on the Core 9 273PTE: 36 MB shared versus 30 MB shared on the i7-14650HX. This 6 MB difference could explain why the Core 9 273PTE performs competitively in Cinebench R23 multi-core despite having fewer cores, as a larger shared cache can reduce memory latency in certain workloads.

The market segment and socket separate them physically. The Core 9 273PTE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the i7-14650HX is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1964. The desktop designation aligns with a 45 W TDP for the Core 9 273PTE, while the mobile i7-14650HX carries a 55 W TDP, which is higher despite its portable form factor. The Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, while the i7-14650HX uses Raptor Lake-HX architecture with a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh generation label.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-14650HX uses UHD Graphics 710. The die size is only recorded for the i7-14650HX at 257 mm², with no equivalent figure for the Core 9 273PTE. The multiplier is unlocked on the i7-14650HX but locked on the Core 9 273PTE, which affects overclocking potential.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores. Both have 24 threads.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 9 273PTE scores 2886 versus 1969, a 46.6% advantage. The largest multi-core margin is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the i7-14650HX leads by 40.6%.

Q: Do the two processors tie in any benchmark?

A: Yes, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a delta of 0%, with the Core 9 273PTE at 20445 and the i7-14650HX at 20454.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the i7-14650HX has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Are both processors on the same process node?

A: Yes, both are on a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-14650HX has 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins 15 of 17 benchmark comparisons and holds an average benchmark score of 41576, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, sitting in the 82nd percentile. The i7-14650HX’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at a -0.1% delta and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at a 0.5% delta, which places it in strong company. The Core 9 273PTE’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700F at 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at 0.2%, indicating it performs near the level of older high-end desktop parts.

For multi-threaded tasks, the i7-14650HX is the clear choice. Its 16-core configuration delivers 28-40% higher scores in most Cinebench and Passmark multi-core tests. The only exception is Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the two are effectively tied. For single-threaded performance, the Core 9 273PTE shows a substantial win in Cinebench R23 single-core but loses in Passmark single-thread, making its advantage inconsistent.

The i7-14650HX is the stronger overall processor. The 88th percentile ranking versus 82nd, the 41576 average score versus 31143, and the 15-2 win tally all confirm this. The Core 9 273PTE is a desktop part with a higher boost clock and larger L3 cache, but those features do not translate into aggregate benchmark superiority. The i7-14650HX is the better choice for any workload that benefits from more cores, which covers the majority of the recorded tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PTE | Intel Core i7-14650HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 1.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.50 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Die size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $549 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part number | SA4QJ | SRMXH |