Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core i7-13705H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a near-even split, with the Intel Core 9 273PTE taking 9 wins and the Intel Core i7-13705H taking 8. The most decisive advantage belongs to the Core 9 273PTE in the Cinebench suite. Across all six Cinebench tests, the Core 9 273PTE posts a uniform 27.8% lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 20445 against 15998, while in single-core it reaches 2886 versus 2258. The same margin repeats in R20 (8586 vs 6719 multi-core, 1212 vs 948 single-core) and R15 (2060 vs 1612 multi-core, 290 vs 227 single-core). This consistency suggests a broad architectural advantage in rendering workloads rather than a test-specific quirk.

The i7-13705H fights back in the Passmark suite, winning several math and data-oriented tests. Its largest margin comes in data encryption, where it scores 16324 against 14253, a 12.7% advantage. Data compression also favors the i7-13705H, at 273720 versus 258704, a 5.5% gap. Integer math goes to the i7-13705H by 4.1% (85927 vs 82411), floating-point math by 3.8% (63064 vs 60673), and multithread by 1.7% (24460 vs 24054). Random string sorting shows a narrow 1.1% lead for the i7-13705H (29285 vs 28973), and single-thread Passmark scores favor it by 1.4% (3483 vs 3433).

The Core 9 273PTE holds smaller but meaningful wins elsewhere. Find prime numbers shows a 22.4% advantage (142 vs 116), physics tests go its way by 3.4% (1917 vs 1854), and extended instructions edge ahead by 0.9% (15952 vs 15810). The pattern is clear: the Core 9 273PTE dominates synthetic rendering and prime-number workloads, while the i7-13705H leads in data compression, encryption, and general math throughput. The overall average benchmark scores reflect this balance, with the i7-13705H at 32076 and the Core 9 273PTE at 31143, placing both in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families and target different platforms. The Core 9 273PTE is a Bartlett Lake part on Intel Socket 1700, listed as a desktop segment component. The i7-13705H belongs to the Raptor Lake-H series, uses Intel BGA 1744, and is classified as mobile. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process and fabricated by Intel, but their core configurations differ. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads. This means the i7-13705H has more physical cores but fewer threads, indicating a different hybrid arrangement.

Cache layouts also diverge. Both share 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache is larger on the Core 9 273PTE at 36 MB versus 24 MB. The die size is only recorded for the i7-13705H at 257 mm²; the Core 9 273PTE's die size is not listed. Clock speeds favor the Core 9 273PTE on boost, with 5.50 GHz against 5.00 GHz, but the i7-13705H starts from a higher base clock of 2.40 GHz versus 1.40 GHz. Both carry a 45 W TDP.

Memory support is identical in type, with both accepting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The Core 9 273PTE records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i7-13705H has no bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory is supported on the Core 9 273PTE but not on the i7-13705H. PCIe lanes differ as well: the Core 9 273PTE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the i7-13705H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics differ, with the Core 9 273PTE using UHD Graphics 730 and the i7-13705H using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Release timing is also distinct. The Core 9 273PTE carries a release date of March 2026, while the i7-13705H came out in January 2023. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both remain in active production. The Core 9 273PTE's part number is SA4QJ, while the i7-13705H's is SRMHV.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins every Cinebench test by exactly 27.8%, including R23 multi-core (20445 vs 15998) and R23 single-core (2886 vs 2258).

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13705H win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the i7-13705H wins 8 tests, all in the Passmark suite. Its largest win is data encryption at 12.7%, followed by data compression at 5.5%, integer math at 4.1%, and floating-point math at 3.8%.

Q: How do their core and thread counts compare?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The i7-13705H has more physical cores, but the Core 9 273PTE has more threads.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 24 MB on the i7-13705H. Both have identical L1 and L2 cache per core at 80 KB and 2 MB respectively.

Q: Are both processors on the same socket?

A: No. The Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i7-13705H uses Intel BGA 1744. They are not physically interchangeable.

Q: What are the boost clock differences?

A: The Core 9 273PTE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the i7-13705H boosts to 5.00 GHz. The i7-13705H has a higher base clock at 2.40 GHz versus 1.40 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks stand at 1.40 GHz for the Core 9 273PTE and 2.40 GHz for the i7-13705H, while boost clocks are 5.50 GHz and 5.00 GHz respectively. Sockets differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 9 273PTE versus Intel BGA 1744 for the i7-13705H. The Core 9 273PTE uses Bartlett Lake architecture, while the i7-13705H uses Raptor Lake architecture. L3 cache is 36 MB on the Core 9 273PTE and 24 MB on the i7-13705H.

Market segments differ, with the Core 9 273PTE listed as desktop and the i7-13705H as mobile. The i7-13705H records a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9 273PTE has no die size listed. Memory bandwidth shows 89.6 GB/s for the Core 9 273PTE, with no figure for the i7-13705H. ECC support is present on the Core 9 273PTE but absent on the i7-13705H. PCIe lanes differ at 16 for the Core 9 273PTE and 8 for the i7-13705H, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PTE and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the i7-13705H. Release dates differ, with the Core 9 273PTE launching in March 2026 and the i7-13705H in January 2023. The part numbers are SA4QJ and SRMHV respectively.

The Verdict

The data points to a performance split based on workload type. For rendering, single-threaded applications, and prime-number calculations, the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the stronger choice, with its 27.8% Cinebench advantage being the most pronounced gap in the entire comparison. The Core 9 273PTE also offers more threads, more L3 cache, higher boost clock, ECC support, and more PCIe lanes, making it suitable for desktop systems that prioritize those features.

The Intel Core i7-13705H, however, wins the majority of Passmark math and data tests despite having fewer threads and less cache. Its wins in data compression, encryption, integer math, and floating-point math suggest it handles real-world data manipulation tasks efficiently. Its higher base clock and 14 physical cores may contribute to these results. The i7-13705H also has a higher average benchmark score at 32076 versus 31143, though both sit at the 82nd percentile.

Users should base their choice on the specific workloads they run. The Core 9 273PTE is aimed at desktop builds where rendering and single-thread performance matter most. The i7-13705H is a mobile processor that shows strength in data-heavy tasks, making it a fit for laptops where those workloads are common.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins in all Cinebench rendering tests, including R15, R20, and R23, in both multi-core and single-core modes. It also wins Passmark extended instructions, find prime numbers, and physics tests. Its 27.8% margin across Cinebench makes it the clear pick for 3D rendering, video encoding, and other heavily threaded creative workloads.

The Intel Core i7-13705H wins Passmark data compression, data encryption, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. Its strongest margins are in encryption at 12.7% and compression at 5.5%, pointing to advantages in file archiving, database operations, and security-related tasks. It also edges out the Core 9 273PTE in overall average benchmark score, making it the better choice for general-purpose computing that mixes these Passmark workloads.