Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core i7-13700TE Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PTE and Intel Core i7-13700TE are both 24-thread desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet they deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The Core 9 273PTE, based on the Bartlett Lake architecture, wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Core i7-13700TE, a Raptor Lake part, takes only 3. Their average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 31143 for the Core 9 versus 31028 for the Core i7 — placing both at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The data reveals a clear split: the Core 9 dominates in Cinebench rendering and several PassMark workloads, while the Core i7 holds advantages in specific math and encryption tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head results is the Core 9 273PTE’s consistent advantage across every Cinebench test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core 9 scores 2060 against 1884 for the Core i7, a 9.3% lead. The single-core R15 result shows a similar margin: 290 versus 265, a 9.4% difference. This consistency carries through Cinebench R20 and R23, where the Core 9 posts 8586 and 20445 respectively, versus 7853 and 18698 for the Core i7. In each case, the delta is exactly 9.3% for multicore and 9.4% for single-core. These are not marginal wins; the Core 9 is decisively faster across the entire Cinebench suite.

The PassMark suite reveals a more nuanced picture. The Core 9 wins the multithread test with 24054 points against 22754, a 5.7% margin, and takes data compression with 258704 versus 243565, a 6.2% edge. Its biggest wins come in find prime numbers and physics, where it scores 142 and 1917 respectively, versus 101 and 1368 for the Core i7 — leads of 40.6% and 40.1%. The extended instructions test also favors the Core 9 at 15952 versus 13750, a 16% advantage. Random string sorting goes to the Core 9 as well, 28973 versus 27307, a 6.1% difference. The single-thread tests are nearly a tie: 3433 versus 3422, a 0.3% edge for the Core 9.

The Core i7-13700TE’s three wins are concentrated in specific workloads. Its largest victory is in integer math, where it scores 97911 against 82411 for the Core 9 — a 15.8% advantage. Floating point math also goes to the Core i7, 66421 versus 60673, an 8.7% lead. The third win is in data encryption, 15006 versus 14253, a 5% margin. These results indicate that the Core i7’s higher core count (16 versus 12) provides a meaningful boost in certain arithmetic-heavy PassMark tests, even though the Core 9 wins the overall multithread and physics tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-13700TE boosts to 4.80 GHz. The Core 9’s higher boost clock contributes to its consistent single-core wins in Cinebench and PassMark single-thread tests.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 9.3% higher than the Core i7-13700TE’s 18698. This is the same relative margin seen in Cinebench R15 and R20 multicore tests.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700TE win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the Core i7-13700TE wins three tests: PassMark integer math (97911 versus 82411, a 15.8% lead), floating point math (66421 versus 60673, an 8.7% lead), and data encryption (15006 versus 14253, a 5% lead).

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Core i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core 9 wins the PassMark multithread test with 24054 versus 22754.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core i7-13700TE has 30 MB. The Core 9’s larger L3 cache may contribute to its wins in data compression and random string sorting.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, but the Core i7-13700TE does not. This is a notable feature difference for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on different architectures, despite sharing the Intel Socket 1700 and a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core i7-13700TE uses Raptor Lake-S. The Core i7 is explicitly listed as part of the Core 13th Gen series with a Raptor Lake architecture, whereas the Core 9’s series is not specified. The die size also differs: the Core i7-13700TE has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9’s die size is not listed in the data.

The core configurations diverge significantly. The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. Both processors share the same L1 cache of 80 KB per core and L2 cache of 2 MB per core, but the L3 cache differs: 36 MB shared on the Core 9 versus 30 MB shared on the Core i7. The base clocks are dramatically different, with the Core 9 running at 1.40 GHz and the Core i7 at 1100.00 MHz, although the boost clocks are closer at 5.50 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively. The TDP also differs, with the Core 9 rated at 45 W and the Core i7 at 35 W.

Memory and I/O features show further divergence. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the Core 9 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i7’s memory bandwidth is not provided. The Core 9 supports ECC memory; the Core i7 does not. PCIe lanes differ as well: the Core 9 has Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i7 has Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the Core 9 featuring UHD Graphics 730 and the Core i7 featuring UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear overall winner: the Intel Core 9 273PTE. It wins 14 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including every Cinebench test, the PassMark multithread test, and the physics test. Its average benchmark score of 31143 is 0.4% higher than the Core i7-13700TE’s 31028, and both sit at the 82nd percentile. For users prioritizing rendering performance, the Core 9’s 9.3–9.4% lead across all Cinebench versions is decisive. For those focused on single-thread workloads, the Core 9 also holds the edge, albeit narrowly at 0.3% in PassMark single-thread and 9.4% in Cinebench R23 single-core. The Core 9’s higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, larger 36 MB L3 cache, and ECC memory support further reinforce its position as the more capable processor.

However, the Core i7-13700TE is not without merit. Its 16-core configuration gives it a 15.8% advantage in integer math and an 8.7% lead in floating point math, making it the better choice for workloads that are heavily dependent on raw arithmetic throughput. Its data encryption win, at 5%, also suggests an edge in cryptographic workloads. The Core i7’s lower TDP of 35 W versus 45 W may be relevant for thermally constrained systems, and its UHD Graphics 770 is a more capable integrated GPU than the Core 9’s UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 1.40 GHz for the Core 9 and 1100.00 MHz for the Core i7, with boost clocks of 5.50 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively. TDP is 45 W for the Core 9 and 35 W for the Core i7. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the Core 9 and 30 MB shared on the Core i7. The Core 9 supports ECC memory; the Core i7 does not. PCIe lanes are Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core 9 and Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the Core i7. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 and UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i7. The Core 9 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i7’s memory bandwidth is not specified. The Core 9 has a release date of 2026-03-08 and a launch MSRP of $549, while the Core i7 has a release date of 2023-01-03 and no launch MSRP listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the preferred choice for rendering and content creation workloads. Its consistent 9.3% lead in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests demonstrates a strong advantage in CPU-bound rendering tasks. The 40.6% win in PassMark find prime numbers and the 40.1% win in physics further indicate superiority in computational and simulation tasks. The Core 9 also wins in data compression (6.2%), extended instructions (16%), and random string sorting (6.1%), making it suitable for data processing and sorting workloads. Its higher boost clock and larger L3 cache support these wins.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is the better option for specific arithmetic-heavy workloads. Its 15.8% lead in integer math and 8.7% lead in floating point math suggest an advantage in scientific computing, financial modeling, or any application that heavily utilizes these operations. The 5% win in data encryption positions it as the stronger choice for security and cryptography tasks. Its lower TDP of 35 W makes it more suitable for power-constrained or compact systems, and the UHD Graphics 770 provides better integrated graphics performance for systems without a discrete GPU. For users whose primary workloads are integer math, floating point math, or encryption, the Core i7-13700TE is the data-backed selection.