Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PQE and Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data shows that their performance profiles do not overlap in any meaningful way. The Intel part is a desktop-focused 12-core processor with 24 threads, while the Snapdragon is a mobile-oriented 18-core chip with 18 threads. The benchmark database contains a full suite of scores for the Intel Core 9 273PQE, while the Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no recorded benchmark results. This absence of data shapes the entire comparison: the analysis below relies entirely on the Intel processor’s measured performance and the architectural specifications of both parts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores. The database shows no test results for the Snapdragon X2E-88-100, so no direct performance comparison is possible. The Intel processor’s wins span single-threaded, multi-threaded, and specialized workloads, with scores that place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The Intel part’s strongest showing is in multi-threaded rendering. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,190 and its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16,459 indicate that heavily threaded workloads, such as 3D rendering and video encoding, are where this processor delivers its most decisive results. The 24 threads, enabled by Hyper-Threading on 12 cores, provide the parallelism needed for these tasks.

Single-threaded performance is also a clear strength for the Intel processor. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,532 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,573 show that lightly threaded applications, such as legacy software or single-threaded games, benefit from the high boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The data indicates that the Intel part is balanced across both single-thread and multi-thread scenarios, with no obvious weak point in the recorded tests.

The Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no benchmark scores in the database, so there is no evidence of any workload where it wins. Its 18 cores and 18 threads suggest that it is designed for parallel throughput, but without recorded measurements, any claim about its performance is unsupported. The database’s percentile field for the Snapdragon is 50, but this is derived from an average score of zero, which reflects the absence of test data rather than actual performance.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between the two processors is substantial. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s own foundry. The Snapdragon X2E-88-100 uses the Glymur codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X2 Elite generation, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. The smaller process node for the Qualcomm part indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, though the Intel part’s larger node is offset by its higher boost clock.

Core counts differ significantly. The Intel processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Snapdragon has 18 cores and 18 threads. The Intel part’s thread count doubles its core count, implying simultaneous multithreading, whereas the Snapdragon has a one-to-one core-to-thread ratio, indicating no such feature. The Snapdragon’s higher base clock of 4.00 GHz, compared to 3.40 GHz for the Intel part, suggests that the Qualcomm design favors higher baseline frequency, while the Intel part’s boost clock of 5.90 GHz exceeds the Snapdragon’s 4.70 GHz boost.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The Intel processor uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon uses 288 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of L2 cache per module, with no L3 cache listed. The Intel part’s shared L3 cache is a notable advantage for workloads that require frequent data sharing across cores, while the Snapdragon’s larger per-core L1 cache and per-module L2 design targets a different data access pattern.

Memory support also diverges. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, along with ECC memory support. The Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a higher recorded bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s, but no ECC support. The higher memory bandwidth for the Snapdragon reflects the requirements of mobile integrated designs, where memory is often soldered and tightly coupled to the processor.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Snapdragon uses Adreno X2-90. PCIe connectivity is similar in generation but different in lane count: the Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Snapdragon offers Gen 5 with 12 CPU-only lanes. The market segment for the Intel part is Desktop, while the Snapdragon is classified as Mobile, which explains the socket differences: Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part and Qualcomm BGA 2343 for the Snapdragon.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the wins count is zero for both processors. No direct comparative test results exist in the database, so the only available performance data comes from the Intel Core 9 273PQE’s individual benchmark suite. The Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no scores at all, which prevents any side-by-side numerical comparison.

The Intel processor’s measured scores provide a baseline for what this desktop part can do. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 39,190 and single-core score of 5,532 show a strong balance. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 16,459 and single-core score of 2,323 follow the same pattern. The Cinebench R15 results, with a multi-core score of 3,950 and single-core score of 557, confirm the trend across generations of the Cinebench test.

PassMark results for the Intel processor cover a wide range of workloads. The multi-thread score is 46,107, while the single-thread score is 4,573. Integer math scores 164,629, and floating-point math scores 125,546. Data compression scores 585,752, and data encryption scores 29,636. Extended instructions score 38,743, and find prime numbers scores 198. Random string sorting scores 53,167, and physics scores 2,754. These numbers indicate that the Intel part is particularly strong in integer math and data compression, while the find prime numbers score is comparatively low, which is typical for a processor that prioritizes high clock speeds over specialized prime-number algorithms.

Relative to its nearest rivals in the database, the Intel Core 9 273PQE shows a tight competitive cluster. Its average benchmark score is 66,099, which is 0.1 percent below the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (average score 66,159) and 0.3 percent above the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (average score 65,914). It sits 1.1 percent below the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (average score 66,855) and 1.2 percent below the AMD EPYC 4465P (average score 66,925). These small percentage differences suggest that the Intel Core 9 273PQE is closely matched with a range of desktop and server processors, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has 18 cores, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores. However, the Intel part has 24 threads due to its 12-core, 24-thread design, while the Snapdragon has 18 threads, matching its core count.

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PQE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 9 273PQE supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon’s bandwidth is higher, but both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, which is higher than the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Snapdragon’s base clock of 4.00 GHz is higher than the Intel part’s base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: Are there any benchmark results for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark results for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile ranking of 50 reflects the absence of test data rather than measured performance.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 is built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is manufactured by Intel, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-88-100 has no manufacturer listed in the database. The Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, while the Snapdragon uses the Glymur codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X2 Elite generation. The process node is 10 nm for the Intel part and 3 nm for the Snapdragon, with the Intel part fabricated by Intel and the Snapdragon fabricated by TSMC. The die size for the Snapdragon is 220 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Core and thread counts differ: 12 cores and 24 threads for the Intel part, 18 cores and 18 threads for the Snapdragon. Base clocks are 3.40 GHz for the Intel part and 4.00 GHz for the Snapdragon, while boost clocks are 5.90 GHz for the Intel part and 4.70 GHz for the Snapdragon. The TDP for the Intel part is 125 watts, while no TDP is recorded for the Snapdragon. The socket is Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part and Qualcomm BGA 2343 for the Snapdragon.

Cache configurations differ: the Intel part uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3, while the Snapdragon uses 288 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of L2 per module, with no L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel part, while the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the Intel part and 152.4 GB/s for the Snapdragon. ECC memory is supported on the Intel part but not on the Snapdragon. PCIe lanes are Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Intel part and Gen 5 with 12 lanes for the Snapdragon. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the Intel part and Adreno X2-90 for the Snapdragon. The market segment is Desktop for the Intel part and Mobile for the Snapdragon. The release date is 2026-03-08 for the Intel part and 2026-04-05 for the Snapdragon. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 9 273PQE is $589, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the Snapdragon. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.