Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 take fundamentally different approaches to computing, and the recorded data reflects a wide performance gulf between them. The Intel chip holds a decisive edge across every measured workload, while the Qualcomm part posts no benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison to the Intel side alone.

Intel’s Core 9 273PQE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and a single-core score of 5532. In Cinebench R20, it records 16459 multi-core and 2323 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3950 multi-core and 557 single-core. These results place the processor in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of 66099.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel part provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 65914, which is 0.3% behind the Intel chip. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus averages 66159, a 0.1% deficit. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus sits 1.1% ahead at 66855, and the AMD EPYC 4465P leads by 1.2% with an average score of 66925. The Core 9 273PQE thus clusters tightly with these high-end desktop and server parts, trading places within a narrow band of roughly one to two percent.

PassMark tests further illustrate the Intel chip’s capabilities. It scores 585752 in data compression, 29636 in data encryption, and 38743 in extended instructions. Integer math reaches 164629, floating point math hits 125546, and prime number finding records 198. Multithreaded performance is 46107, while single-thread performance is 4573. Random string sorting produces 53167, and physics processing yields 2754.

Since the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no recorded benchmark scores, the database shows zero wins for either processor in a direct head-to-head tally. The Intel part wins every available comparison by default, but the absence of Qualcomm results means the data cannot quantify the exact margin. The Qualcomm chip does hold a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which places it at the median of the database’s tracked processors, but without raw scores, no specific delta can be computed.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a core count of 12, but their threading models diverge sharply. The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports 24 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while the Snapdragon X1E-80-100 manages only 12 threads with one thread per core. This difference directly impacts multi-threaded workloads, where the Intel chip can process twice as many threads concurrently.

Manufacturing processes also separate the pair. Intel fabricates its Bartlett Lake processor on a 10 nm node at its own foundry. Qualcomm uses TSMC’s 4 nm process for the Oryon codename design. The smaller process node typically enables better power efficiency per transistor, though the Intel chip compensates with a much higher thermal design power of 125 watts compared to the Snapdragon’s 35 watts.

Cache hierarchies present another structural contrast. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The Qualcomm design uses a larger 288 KB L1 per core, a 12 MB L2 per module, but only 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip’s larger L3 pool benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, while the Snapdragon’s per-core L1 and per-module L2 structure targets lower latency for its mobile-oriented design.

Clock speeds differ substantially. Both start at a base clock of 3.40 GHz, but the Intel processor boosts to 5.90 GHz, whereas the Snapdragon reaches only 4.00 GHz. That 1.90 GHz boost advantage gives Intel a significant single-thread speed edge. Memory support also diverges: Intel accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while Qualcomm uses LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus delivering 135.2 GB/s. The Snapdragon’s higher memory bandwidth suits its integrated graphics and mobile workloads, but the Intel part’s dual memory standards offer broader platform flexibility.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while Qualcomm offers Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe standard on Intel doubles the theoretical per-lane bandwidth, which matters for high-throughput storage and discrete GPUs. Integrated graphics also differ: Intel uses UHD Graphics 770, and Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-85. Neither processor supports ECC memory in the same way; Intel lists ECC as supported, while Qualcomm does not.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins in nearly every performance category that the database measures. Its 24 threads and 5.90 GHz boost clock make it the clear choice for heavily threaded productivity, content creation, and scientific computing. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39190 and PassMark multithread at 46107 demonstrate strong scaling across all cores. The single-thread score of 4573 in PassMark and 5532 in Cinebench R23 show that even lightly threaded tasks, such as older software or certain games, benefit from the high boost frequency. The 36 MB shared L3 cache aids in large dataset processing, and the 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for modern expansion.

The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 wins in efficiency and platform integration, though the database lacks benchmark scores to confirm performance. Its 35 watt TDP is roughly one-third of the Intel part’s 125 watts, which makes it suitable for fanless or low-power mobile designs. The 4 nm process from TSMC and the 135.2 GB/s LPDDR5X memory bandwidth support a compact system-on-chip layout, where the CPU, GPU, and memory controller share a unified design. The larger 288 KB L1 cache per core and 12 MB L2 per module reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data, which can help in bursty mobile workloads. The 50th percentile ranking indicates it performs at the median level of all tracked CPUs, but without specific scores, its exact wins cannot be quantified.

For desktop users seeking maximum compute throughput, the Intel part’s 24 threads, higher clocks, and larger L3 cache provide a clear advantage. For mobile users prioritizing battery life and low heat output, the Snapdragon’s 35 watt TDP and integrated Adreno X1-85 graphics offer a more balanced package, though the data does not record any benchmark victories for it.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PQE | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 12 |

| Threads | 24 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.90 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Oryon |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB per core | 12 MB per module |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 12 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Adreno X1-85 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-04-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $589 | Not specified |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 24 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 threads. Both have 12 physical cores, but Intel uses simultaneous multithreading to double the thread count.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel part boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the Qualcomm part reaches 4.00 GHz. Both start at a 3.40 GHz base clock. The Intel processor holds a 1.90 GHz advantage at maximum boost.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 delivers 135.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth using LPDDR5X, whereas the Intel Core 9 273PQE provides 89.6 GB/s with DDR4 or DDR5. Qualcomm’s higher bandwidth supports its mobile integrated design.

Q: Does the Intel processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 9 273PQE lists ECC memory as supported. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The smaller node typically improves power efficiency.

Q: What are their market segments?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE is designed for desktop systems with a 125 watt TDP and an Intel Socket 1700. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 targets mobile devices with a 35 watt TDP and a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket.