Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Processor U302L are positioned at opposite ends of Intel's performance spectrum, and the recorded data confirms a complete dominance by the Core 9 part. The most striking comparison comes from the raw compute tests where the Core 9 273PQE delivers scores that dwarf the U302L entirely. However, the U302L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the comparison is entirely one-sided. The Core 9 273PQE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190, while its single-core score reaches 5532. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 16459 with a single-core score of 2323. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3950 multi-core and 557 single-core. These numbers place the Core 9 273PQE in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors tracked.

The PassMark suite further illustrates the Core 9 273PQE's capabilities. Its multi-thread score is 46107, while single-thread performance registers 4573. Integer math reaches 164629, floating-point math hits 125546, and extended instructions score 38743. Data compression produces 585752, data encryption scores 29636, and random string sorting reaches 53167. Physics processing scores 2754, while find prime numbers yields 198. These results indicate a processor built for heavy sustained workloads, with particularly strong throughput in integer and floating-point operations.

The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PQE in the database are all closely matched. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus averages 66159, which is 0.1% ahead of the Core 9 273PQE's average benchmark score of 66099. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 65914, trailing the Core 9 273PQE by 0.3%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus averages 66855, which is 1.1% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4465P averages 66925, which is 1.2% higher. These deltas are minimal, suggesting the Core 9 273PQE sits in a tightly contested performance band despite its high absolute scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a common process node at 10 nm and both come from Intel's foundry, but their underlying designs diverge sharply. The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 9 generation, while the U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename. This is a fundamental split: Bartlett Lake represents a newer desktop-oriented design, whereas Raptor Lake-PS is a mobile-focused variant.

Core counts and threading expose the biggest structural gap. The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that fully doubles the thread count of the U302L, which has 5 cores and 6 threads. The clock speeds reinforce this divide. The Core 9 273PQE runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 5.90 GHz. The U302L operates at 1.20 GHz base and 2.40 GHz boost, meaning the Core 9 part has a higher base clock by 2.20 GHz and a higher boost clock by 3.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also differ substantially. Both processors list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the Core 9 273PQE, while the U302L has 1.25 MB per core. The shared L3 cache is where the gap becomes extreme: the Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB shared, while the U302L has 10 MB shared. This is a 26 MB difference in favor of the Core 9 part, which directly supports its higher core count and multi-threaded workload capacity.

Memory support is similar in scope: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 9 273PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the U302L has no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory is supported on the Core 9 273PQE but not on the U302L. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Core 9 273PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the U302L provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes. This makes the Core 9 part more suited to high-bandwidth expansion and modern GPUs.

Integrated graphics take different forms. The Core 9 273PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the U302L uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The market segments confirm their intended roles: the Core 9 273PQE is a Desktop processor, and the U302L is a Mobile processor. The release dates also differ, with the Core 9 273PQE launching in 2026-03-08 and the U302L launching in 2024-04-07. Both parts are currently Active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Given the absence of benchmark scores for the U302L, the Core 9 273PQE wins every measurable comparison in the database. The analysis therefore focuses on what the recorded data indicates each processor is designed to do, rather than direct head-to-head wins.

The Core 9 273PQE is clearly optimized for high-throughput desktop computing. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.90 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, make it suitable for multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and PassMark multi-thread score of 46107 confirm that it excels in workloads that scale across many threads. The 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database reinforces its position as a high-end desktop part.

The U302L, with its 5 cores and 6 threads, a boost clock of 2.40 GHz, and a 15 W TDP, is built for mobile efficiency. Its low power envelope and modest core count indicate a design focused on battery-conscious tasks such as office productivity, web browsing, and light media playback. The lack of recorded benchmark scores means the database contains no direct evidence of its performance level, but its specifications point to a processor that prioritizes power efficiency over raw compute throughput.

The architecture split further clarifies the intended use cases. Bartlett Lake in the Core 9 273PQE is a desktop-focused design with high clock ceilings and substantial cache. Raptor Lake-PS in the U302L is a mobile-oriented variant with lower clocks and a smaller cache footprint. The PCIe difference reinforces this: Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the desktop part versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the mobile part. The Core 9 273PQE also supports ECC memory, a feature often sought in workstation or server-adjacent desktop environments, while the U302L does not.

FAQ

Q: How large is the performance gap between the two processors based on recorded data?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has extensive benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 46107. The U302L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct performance comparison can be quantified.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz. The difference is 3.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 9 273PQE also supports ECC memory, while the U302L does not.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PQE is classified as a Desktop processor, while the U302L is classified as a Mobile processor.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare between the two?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the U302L has 10 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The recorded data leaves no ambiguity: the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the superior performer by every metric available in the database. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190, a single-core score of 5532, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 46107, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are all within 1.2% of its average benchmark score of 66099, indicating it competes at the highest tier of desktop processors.

The Intel Processor U302L, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded, making its performance unverifiable against the Core 9 273PQE. Its specifications, including 5 cores, 6 threads, a 2.40 GHz boost clock, and a 15 W TDP, classify it as a mobile efficiency part. The absence of data means it cannot be recommended for any performance-sensitive workload based on the database.

For users seeking maximum compute throughput, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice from the data. Its high core count, large cache, and fast clocks support demanding multi-threaded applications. The U302L, with its low power design, fits scenarios where energy efficiency matters more than raw performance, but the database provides no benchmark evidence to support any specific performance claim. The verdict is straightforward: the Core 9 273PQE is a high-end desktop processor with verified strong scores, while the U302L is a low-power mobile part without recorded performance data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every key specification field. The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 3.40 GHz versus 1.20 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.90 GHz versus 2.40 GHz. TDP ratings are 125 W versus 15 W. The codenames are Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-PS, with generations listed as Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) versus Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). Process nodes are both 10 nm, and both use Intel as the foundry.

Cache configurations differ: L1 is 80 KB per core on both, but L2 is 2 MB per core on the Core 9 273PQE versus 1.25 MB per core on the U302L. L3 is 36 MB shared versus 10 MB shared. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s on the Core 9 273PQE, with no figure recorded for the U302L. ECC memory is supported on the Core 9 273PQE but not on the U302L. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core 9 273PQE versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the U302L. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 80EU. Market segments are Desktop versus Mobile. Release dates are 2026-03-08 versus 2024-04-07. Launch MSRP is $589 for the Core 9 273PQE and $285 for the U302L. Both parts are Active in production, neither has an unlocked multiplier, and both use Intel Socket 1700.