Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits this comparison into two very different profiles. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is a 12-core, 24-thread processor that posts scores in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor 300 is a 2-core, 4-thread part that sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap alone indicates the Core 9 is aimed at workloads that scale with core count, while the Processor 300 occupies the entry-level desktop space where single-thread responsiveness and low power draw matter more than raw throughput.

Looking at the recorded measurements, the Core 9 273PQE dominates every category where parallel execution matters. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,190 points is the standout result. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,107 and the integer math score of 164,629 both confirm that this chip is built for sustained multi-core workloads. The data compression result of 585,752 in PassMark is particularly notable, as it shows strength in tasks that can use many threads simultaneously.

The Intel Processor 300, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of recorded scores makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for that part. What the data does show is its specification profile: a 3.90 GHz base clock with no boost clock listed, 2 cores, 4 threads, and a 46 W TDP. The Processor 300 is a low-power part designed for basic desktop use. Its higher base clock relative to the Core 9's 3.40 GHz suggests it may hold its own in lightly threaded tasks that do not require boost behavior, but the database contains no scores to confirm this.

The use-case split is clear from the available numbers. The Core 9 273PQE wins in any scenario that involves rendering, compiling, encoding, or scientific computing, all of which benefit from 12 cores and 24 threads. The Processor 300, with its modest 2-core configuration, is suited for office productivity, web browsing, and light media consumption where the absence of a boost clock is less impactful.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700 and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. They share the same foundry, the same L1 cache layout of 80 KB per core, and the same PCIe configuration: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. These shared traits place them in the same socket generation, but the internal designs diverge sharply.

The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, meaning it supports Hyper-Threading on all cores. Its L2 cache is 2 MB per core, and it has a large 36 MB shared L3 cache. The memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature that matters for workstation and server-adjacent workloads.

The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. It has only 2 cores and 4 threads, so it also supports Hyper-Threading, but on a much smaller scale. Its L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, and the shared L3 cache drops to 6 MB. The die size is listed at 163 mm², though no die size is provided for the Core 9. The Processor 300 does not support ECC memory, and its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 9 273PQE carries UHD Graphics 770, while the Processor 300 uses UHD Graphics 710. Both are integrated solutions suitable for basic display output, but the 770 is the higher-tier implementation.

The release dates show a generation gap. The Processor 300 launched in January 2024, while the Core 9 273PQE arrived in March 2026. Both are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 9 has a part number of SA4Q9, while the Processor 300 uses SRN3J.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and the win counts are zero for both parts. This means the comparison must rely on the standalone benchmark scores recorded for the Core 9 273PQE and the specification profile of the Processor 300.

The Core 9 273PQE's standalone scores are extensive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39,190 multi-core and 5,532 single-core. The R20 results show 16,459 multi-core and 2,323 single-core. R15 shows 3,950 multi-core and 557 single-core. These numbers place the Core 9 in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66,099.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Core 9's standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus averages 66,159, just 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D averages 65,914, which is 0.3% lower than the Core 9. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus sits 1.1% higher at 66,855, and the AMD EPYC 4465P leads by 1.2% at 66,925. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating the Core 9 273PQE performs essentially at parity with a group of strong mid-range and high-end rivals.

The PassMark results for the Core 9 show 125,546 in floating point math, 164,629 in integer math, 46,107 in multithread, and 4,573 in single-thread. The data encryption score is 29,636, extended instructions score 38,743, and find prime numbers scores 198. Random string sorting reaches 53,167. The physics score is 2,754.

Since the Processor 300 has no benchmark scores, the only quantitative comparison available is through specifications. The Core 9 has 6 times the cores and 6 times the threads of the Processor 300. Its L3 cache is 6 times larger at 36 MB versus 6 MB. The boost clock of 5.90 GHz on the Core 9 is notable, while the Processor 300 lists no boost clock at all. The TDP difference is substantial: 125 W for the Core 9 versus 46 W for the Processor 300.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Core 9 provides six times the core count and six times the thread count.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 9 273PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Processor 300 has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 W. The Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 W. The Processor 300 draws substantially less power.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The Core 9 273PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, and the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Core 9 273PQE supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300 does not list ECC support.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two?

A: The Intel Processor 300 was released in January 2024. The Intel Core 9 273PQE was released in March 2026.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice for any workload that benefits from multiple cores. Its 93rd percentile ranking, its average benchmark score of 66,099, and its strong Cinebench and PassMark results all confirm this. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 36 MB L3 cache and a 5.90 GHz boost clock, make it suitable for rendering, compilation, data compression, and scientific computing. The ECC memory support adds further appeal for workstation users.

The Intel Processor 300, with no benchmark scores in the database, cannot be quantitatively compared on performance. Its specification profile suggests a different purpose entirely. The 2 cores and 4 threads, the 46 W TDP, and the absence of a boost clock indicate a basic desktop processor for light tasks. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, which aligns with an entry-level positioning.

The nearest rival data for the Core 9 reinforces its competitive standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, and AMD EPYC 4465P all fall within a 1.2% band of the Core 9's average score. This suggests the Core 9 competes effectively with a broad set of mid-range and high-end processors, despite being a 12-core part rather than a 16-core flagship.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded performance on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, the Core 9 273PQE is the data-supported pick. For users who prioritize low power draw and basic desktop functionality, the Intel Processor 300 offers a much lower TDP at 46 W versus 125 W, though its performance cannot be verified from the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PQE | Intel Processor 300 |

|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 2 |

| Threads | 24 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.90 GHz | None listed |

| TDP | 125 W | 46 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Architecture | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Raptor Lake |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | Not listed | 163 mm² |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | March 2026 | January 2024 |

| Launch MSRP | $589 | $82 |

| Part Number | SA4Q9 | SRN3J |

| Percentile | 93rd | 50th |

| Average Benchmark Score | 66,099 | 0 (no scores) |

Both processors share the Intel Socket 1700, the 10 nm process node, Intel as the foundry, 80 KB L1 cache per core, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, Desktop market segment, Active production status, and locked multipliers.