Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i9-14901TE

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i9-14901TE both target the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they represent distinctly different design philosophies. The Core 9 273PQE is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the Bartlett Lake generation with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The Core i9-14901TE is an 8-core, 16-thread part from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, running at a lower 2.30 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost. The database contains a full benchmark profile for the Core 9 273PQE, while the Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its performance to be assessed through its architectural and specification differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data provides a complete performance picture for the Intel Core 9 273PQE, which achieves an average benchmark score of 66099 and holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. In the absence of any benchmark scores for the Intel Core i9-14901TE, the head-to-head comparison is limited to the Core 9 273PQE’s absolute results and its position relative to other processors in the database.

The Core 9 273PQE delivers strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 39190, and in Cinebench R20 multi-core it reaches 16459. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows 3950 points. These results indicate a processor capable of handling substantial parallel workloads. Single-core performance is also robust, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 5532, Cinebench R20 single-core scoring 2323, and Cinebench R15 single-core scoring 557.

The PassMark suite further details the Core 9 273PQE’s capabilities. Its multi-thread score is 46107, while its single-thread score is 4573. In specific workload tests, the processor scores 164629 in integer math, 125546 in floating point math, and 585752 in data compression. Data encryption scores 29636, extended instructions reach 38743, and random string sorting achieves 53167. The physics test shows 2754, and the find prime numbers test results in 198.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the database, the Core 9 273PQE sits in a tight competitive cluster. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which has an average score of 66159. The Core 9 273PQE is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, which has an average score of 65914. Against the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, the Core 9 273PQE trails by 1.1%, as that processor holds an average score of 66855. The AMD EPYC 4465P leads the group with an average score of 66925, putting the Core 9 273PQE 1.2% behind.

The performance gap between the two processors in this comparison cannot be quantified through direct benchmark scores, as the i9-14901TE has no recorded data. However, the Core 9 273PQE’s core count advantage, 12 cores versus 8, and its higher clock speeds, 5.90 GHz boost versus 5.50 GHz boost, suggest a substantial processing advantage in most workloads. The i9-14901TE’s lower 45 W TDP, compared to the Core 9 273PQE’s 125 W TDP, indicates a design focused on efficiency rather than peak performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE is positioned for performance-intensive desktop tasks. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.90 GHz boost clock, make it suitable for workloads that scale with core count, such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 46107 confirm its strength in these parallel applications. The 125 W TDP allows for sustained high-frequency operation, which benefits tasks that require consistent processing power over extended periods.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE is designed for efficiency. With a 45 W TDP, it consumes significantly less power than the Core 9 273PQE. Its 8 cores and 16 threads still provide respectable multi-threading capability for a lower-power part, and its 5.50 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance when needed. This processor is better suited for environments where thermal output and power consumption are primary concerns, such as compact desktop systems or always-on servers. The i9-14901TE’s lower base clock of 2.30 GHz also contributes to reduced idle and low-load power draw.

The Core 9 273PQE’s higher average benchmark score of 66099, against the i9-14901TE’s lack of recorded scores, underscores its performance focus. The Core 9 273PQE’s 93rd percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, while the i9-14901TE sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark data. For users prioritizing raw compute power, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice. For users prioritizing low power consumption and moderate performance, the i9-14901TE offers a different trade-off.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does the Intel Core 9 273PQE have?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core i9-14901TE?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 W, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 W.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 9 273PQE?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for both processors?

A: Both the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i9-14901TE have 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 3.40 GHz for the Core 9 273PQE and 2.30 GHz for the i9-14901TE. The boost clock is 5.90 GHz for the Core 9 273PQE and 5.50 GHz for the i9-14901TE. The TDP is 125 W for the Core 9 273PQE and 45 W for the i9-14901TE.

The Core 9 273PQE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i9-14901TE has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The i9-14901TE has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9 273PQE has no recorded die size. The release dates differ, with the Core 9 273PQE released on 2026-03-08 and the i9-14901TE released on 2024-06-30. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589, while the i9-14901TE has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, use dual-channel memory, have Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only), and feature UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. Both are active production desktop parts with locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 9 273PQE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture, part of the Core 9 generation. The Intel Core i9-14901TE is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. Both use a 10 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel. The Core 9 273PQE has a codename of Bartlett Lake, while the i9-14901TE has a codename of Raptor Lake-R.

Cache configurations are identical between the two processors: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor features 3D V-Cache. The core count difference, 12 for the Core 9 273PQE versus 8 for the i9-14901TE, is the most significant architectural divergence, directly impacting multi-threaded performance. The Bartlett Lake design appears oriented toward higher performance with a higher TDP, while the Raptor Lake-R design in the i9-14901TE is tuned for lower power consumption, as evidenced by the 45 W TDP and lower base clock. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory, indicating suitability for workstation or server applications. The PCIe interface is also the same: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.