Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and Intel Core i7-14700HX represent two distinct approaches to high-performance x86 computing. The Core 9 273PQE is a desktop-focused processor built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, while the i7-14700HX is a mobile part from the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh family. The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between them, with the Core 9 273PQE winning all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The i7-14700HX offers a higher core count and a larger physical package, but the Core 9 273PQE compensates with significantly higher clock speeds and a more capable memory subsystem.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every single comparison in the database. There is no workload category where the i7-14700HX pulls ahead. The Core 9 273PQE dominates in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks, making it the stronger choice for essentially any compute-intensive application.

The largest advantages for the Core 9 273PQE appear in Cinebench R23 single-core testing, where it scores 5532 against 2103 for the i7-14700HX, a delta of 163.1%. This indicates a massive per-thread performance advantage, which translates directly to snappier application responsiveness and better performance in lightly threaded workloads. The Core 9 273PQE also leads in Cinebench R20 single-core by 26% and in PassMark single-thread by 15.9%, confirming that the single-core advantage is consistent across different benchmark suites.

In multi-threaded scenarios, the Core 9 273PQE maintains its lead, though by smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 39190 versus 24595, a 59.3% advantage. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows a 26% lead, and Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a narrower 3.6% lead. This pattern suggests that the i7-14700HX's additional cores help it close the gap in heavily parallel workloads, but the Core 9 273PQE's higher clock speeds and superior memory bandwidth keep it ahead.

The Core 9 273PQE also wins decisively in specialized workloads. PassMark extended instructions show a 50.6% lead, indicating strong SIMD and vector processing performance. Data compression shows a 33.6% advantage, and floating-point math shows a 33.8% lead. These results indicate that the Core 9 273PQE is better suited for scientific computing, encryption, and data processing tasks. The i7-14700HX is not without merit, but its wins are limited to being the more portable option due to its mobile form factor and lower TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is classified as part of the Core 9 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename, and is part of the Core 14th Gen series. It also uses a 10 nm process node and is fabricated by Intel, but the die size is listed at 257 mm², a detail not provided for the Core 9 273PQE.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core 9 273PQE achieves higher benchmark scores, which points to a significant clock speed advantage. The Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The i7-14700HX has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 0.40 GHz boost advantage for the Core 9 273PQE is notable, but the base clock difference of 1.30 GHz is substantial.

Cache hierarchies are similar in structure but differ in capacity. Both processors feature 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs, with the Core 9 273PQE having 36 MB shared and the i7-14700HX having 33 MB shared. The Core 9 273PQE also lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i7-14700HX does not have this figure recorded. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory.

The market segments are clearly different. The Core 9 273PQE is a Desktop processor with a TDP of 125 watts, while the i7-14700HX is a Mobile processor with a TDP of 55 watts. This explains the i7-14700HX's lower clock speeds, as it is designed for thermal and power constraints of laptops. The Core 9 273PQE uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the i7-14700HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, reflecting their different physical mounting requirements. Both processors use the same integrated graphics, the UHD Graphics 770. The Core 9 273PQE has a locked multiplier, while the i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, which is 0.40 GHz higher than the i7-14700HX's 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these processors?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, and the Intel Core i7-14700HX has a TDP of 55 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i7-14700HX support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i7-14700HX has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX was released in January 2024, and the Intel Core 9 273PQE was released in March 2026.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a Core 9 generation classification, while the i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-HX codename. The core count differs, with the Core 9 273PQE having 12 cores and the i7-14700HX having 20 cores. Thread counts also differ, at 24 for the Core 9 273PQE and 28 for the i7-14700HX.

Clock speeds are significantly different. The Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The i7-14700HX has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The TDP is another major difference, with the Core 9 273PQE rated at 125 watts and the i7-14700HX rated at 55 watts.

The sockets are different: the Core 9 273PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i7-14700HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The L3 cache capacity differs, with the Core 9 273PQE having 36 MB and the i7-14700HX having 33 MB. The memory bandwidth is listed as 89.6 GB/s for the Core 9 273PQE, while no figure is recorded for the i7-14700HX. The market segment differs, with the Core 9 273PQE being Desktop and the i7-14700HX being Mobile.

The release dates differ, with the i7-14700HX released in January 2024 and the Core 9 273PQE released in March 2026. The multiplier unlock status differs, with the Core 9 273PQE locked and the i7-14700HX unlocked. The die size is listed as 257 mm² for the i7-14700HX, with no comparable figure for the Core 9 273PQE. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589, while the i7-14700HX has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a clean sweep for the Core 9 273PQE across all 17 tests. The most dramatic difference is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 9 273PQE scores 5532 against 2103, a 163.1% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and shows the exceptional single-thread performance of the Bartlett Lake desktop part.

Cinebench R15 single-core also shows a massive gap, with the Core 9 273PQE scoring 557 and the i7-14700HX scoring 296, a delta of 88.2%. The Cinebench R20 single-core test shows a 26% lead for the Core 9 273PQE, with scores of 2323 and 1843. PassMark single-thread results show a 15.9% advantage, with scores of 4573 and 3947.

Multi-core results follow a similar pattern. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the Core 9 273PQE at 39190 and the i7-14700HX at 24595, a 59.3% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows a 26% lead, with scores of 16459 and 13059. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows the closest result, with the Core 9 273PQE scoring 3950 and the i7-14700HX scoring 3812, a 3.6% advantage.

Specialized PassMark tests reinforce the Core 9 273PQE's dominance. Extended instructions show a 50.6% lead (38743 vs 25718). Data compression shows a 33.6% lead (585752 vs 438539). Floating-point math shows a 33.8% lead (125546 vs 93836). Integer math shows a 25.4% lead (164629 vs 131296). Data encryption shows a 13.6% lead (29636 vs 26092). Physics shows a 22.3% lead (2754 vs 2252). Random string sorting shows a 9.5% lead (53167 vs 48544). Find prime numbers shows a 20% lead (198 vs 165). The PassMark multithread test shows a 26.1% lead (46107 vs 36566).

The i7-14700HX has no wins in any recorded benchmark. Its closest performance comes in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it trails by only 3.6%, and in PassMark random string sorting, where it trails by 9.5%. The i7-14700HX also has Geekbench scores recorded in its individual benchmark list, with a multi-core score of 14390 and a single-core score of 2116, but these tests are not part of the head-to-head comparison set.

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward choice. The Intel Core 9 273PQE outperforms the Intel Core i7-14700HX in every measured benchmark, with wins in all 17 head-to-head comparisons. It offers higher clock speeds, a higher average benchmark score of 66099 against 45953, and a higher percentile ranking of 93 against 89. The Core 9 273PQE is positioned among rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, with a delta of 0.3%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, with a delta of -1.1%.

The i7-14700HX does have advantages in core count and threads, with 20 cores and 28 threads compared to 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has a lower TDP of 55 watts, making it suitable for mobile systems where power and thermal limits are a concern. Its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, and its die size of 257 mm² is documented. The i7-14700HX sits close to rivals like the AMD EPYC 7303 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, with deltas of 0% and -0.2% respectively.

For users building a desktop system with access to standard power delivery and cooling, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear performance pick. Its substantial single-core lead and consistent multi-core advantage make it suitable for demanding applications. For users constrained to a mobile platform, the i7-14700HX provides a strong 20-core configuration in a 55-watt envelope. The choice between them is therefore driven primarily by form factor and power constraints, not by performance, since the performance data uniformly favors the Core 9 273PQE.