Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and Intel Core i7-14700F are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet they deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The Core 9 273PQE, built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, positions itself as a higher-tier part with a 93rd percentile score against all CPUs. The Core i7-14700F, a Raptor Lake Refresh design, sits at the 91st percentile. The recorded data shows a consistent pattern: the Core 9 273PQE dominates the vast majority of benchmark comparisons, but the i7-14700F holds a couple of specific advantages. The following analysis breaks down the head-to-head results, use-case implications, architectural differences, and practical takeaways from the database measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PQE wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons recorded in the database. Its most decisive victory comes in the PassMark extended instructions test, where it scores 38,743 against 28,564 for the i7-14700F, a 35.6% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and indicates a substantial lead in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets.

Across the entire Cinebench suite, the Core 9 273PQE shows a uniform 11.6% lead over the i7-14700F. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core 9 273PQE scores 39,190 versus 35,122. The single-core result mirrors this: 5,532 against 4,958. The same 11.6% delta appears in Cinebench R15 multicore (3,950 vs 3,540), R15 single-core (557 vs 499), R20 multicore (16,459 vs 14,751), and R20 single-core (2,323 vs 2,082). This consistency across different Cinebench versions suggests a fundamental per-thread performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

In PassMark floating point math, the Core 9 273PQE scores 125,546, a 17.3% lead over the i7-14700F's 107,005. Data compression also favors the Core 9 273PQE: 585,752 versus 505,885, a 15.8% advantage. The Prime numbers test shows a 12.5% lead (198 vs 176), and the physics test shows a 12.2% lead (2,754 vs 2,455). The multithread test result is 46,107 versus 41,317, an 11.6% edge. Single-thread performance in PassMark shows a 7.4% lead for the Core 9 273PQE (4,573 vs 4,257). Integer math is closer: 164,629 versus 155,808, a 5.7% advantage.

The i7-14700F takes two wins. In PassMark data encryption, it scores 30,144 against 29,636, a 1.7% edge. In random string sorting, it scores 55,918 versus 53,167, a 4.9% lead. These are the only two tests where the i7-14700F comes out ahead, and both are narrow margins.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice for compute-heavy, instruction-dense workloads. The 35.6% lead in extended instructions is the standout result, but the consistent 11.6% advantage across all Cinebench versions indicates that rendering and multi-threaded content creation tasks will run noticeably faster. The 17.3% lead in floating-point math points to scientific computing and simulation workloads favoring the Core 9 273PQE. Data compression, with a 15.8% lead, is another area where the Core 9 273PQE pulls ahead meaningfully.

The i7-14700F's wins are narrow but real. In encryption workloads, the 1.7% advantage is minor, yet it suggests the i7-14700F's configuration handles certain cryptographic operations slightly better. Random string sorting shows a 4.9% lead, which could translate to a small edge in specific sorting algorithms or database-style operations. These wins are too small to define a general purpose for the i7-14700F, but they do show that the Core 9 273PQE is not universally faster.

For mixed-use systems, the Core 9 273PQE's 7.4% single-thread lead in PassMark and its 11.6% single-core lead in Cinebench indicate that everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications will favor the Core 9 273PQE. The average benchmark scores in the database reinforce this: the Core 9 273PQE averages 66,099 across all tests, while the i7-14700F averages 53,620. The nearest rival data places the Core 9 273PQE within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The i7-14700F sits within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.

Architecture Differences

The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a process node of 10 nm, produced by Intel. The i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename under the Raptor Lake architecture, also on a 10 nm Intel process. Both processors fit the Intel Socket 1700.

Core counts differ substantially. The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core 9 273PQE wins the multithread tests, which indicates higher per-core throughput.

Clock speeds tell part of the story. The Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The i7-14700F has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core 9 273PQE runs at higher clocks across the board.

Cache configurations are similar in structure but differ in total L3. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-14700F has 33 MB. The Core 9 273PQE also lists a measured die size of 257 mm² for the i7-14700F, while the Core 9 273PQE's die size is not recorded.

Power characteristics differ. The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125, while the i7-14700F has a TDP of 65. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The Core 9 273PQE lists memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i7-14700F's memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both support ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The Core 9 273PQE includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, marked as N/A. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The i7-14700F was released earlier, on 2024-01-07, while the Core 9 273PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08. The i7-14700F's die size of 257 mm² is recorded, and its part number is SRN3Z. The Core 9 273PQE's part number is SA4Q9.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Core 9 273PQE leads in every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 5,532 versus 4,958, an 11.6% advantage. PassMark single-thread shows 4,573 versus 4,257, a 7.4% lead.

Q: Does the i7-14700F win any benchmarks at all?

A: Yes, two. It leads in PassMark data encryption with 30,144 versus 29,636, a 1.7% edge, and in random string sorting with 55,918 versus 53,167, a 4.9% lead.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Core 9 273PQE still wins the multithread tests, including Cinebench R23 multicore with 39,190 versus 35,122.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory and expansion options?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, ECC memory, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Core 9 273PQE records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the i7-14700F's bandwidth is not recorded.

Q: Is there a difference in integrated graphics?

A: The Core 9 273PQE includes UHD Graphics 770. The i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What are the release dates?

A: The i7-14700F was released on 2024-01-07. The Core 9 273PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08.

The Verdict

The data points to the Core 9 273PQE as the stronger processor for almost every workload. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, with the largest victory being a 35.6% lead in extended instructions. Its 11.6% advantage across the entire Cinebench suite makes it the better choice for rendering and multi-threaded productivity. The 17.3% lead in floating-point math and the 15.8% lead in data compression reinforce its position for compute-intensive tasks.

The i7-14700F is not without merit. Its 1.7% encryption win and 4.9% random string sorting win show it handles those specific tasks slightly better. Its lower TDP of 65, compared to 125 for the Core 9 273PQE, suggests it draws less power. It also has more cores, 20 versus 12, which may appeal to users who prioritize core count on paper. But the benchmark results show that core count alone does not translate into performance here, as the Core 9 273PQE wins multithread tests despite having fewer cores.

For users building a system on Intel Socket 1700 and prioritizing raw performance, the Core 9 273PQE is the processor the measurements favor. Its higher clocks, larger L3 cache, and integrated graphics make it a more complete package. The i7-14700F remains a capable processor for builds where the two narrow wins in encryption and sorting matter, or where lower power consumption is a priority. The recorded data, however, gives the Core 9 273PQE the overall performance crown.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PQE | Intel Core i7-14700F |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 20 |

| Threads | 24 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.90 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 125 | 65 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | Not recorded | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $589 | $359 |

| Part Number | SA4Q9 | SRN3Z |