Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-14600

The recorded data presents a clear contrast between two desktop processors sharing the same Intel Socket 1700 platform. The Intel Core 9 273PQE, based on Bartlett Lake, and the Intel Core i5-14600, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh family, both target mainstream desktop systems, but the benchmark results show the Core 9 273PQE leading across every single measured test. The database records 17 wins for the Core 9 273PQE and zero wins for the Core i5-14600, with the average benchmark score for the former at 66099 compared to 44889 for the latter. This places the Core 9 273PQE in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i5-14600 sits in the 89th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head benchmark data leaves no ambiguity regarding performance dominance. The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins all 17 recorded tests, meaning there is no workload category in the database where the Intel Core i5-14600 comes out ahead. This includes Cinebench rendering tests, PassMark computational workloads, and single-threaded assessments. The margin of victory varies considerably by task, ranging from a modest 9.7% advantage in single-threaded PassMark tests to a substantial 50.9% lead in extended instruction processing.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Core 9 273PQE consistently delivers around 28.6% higher scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests. The PassMark multithread test shows a similar 28.6% gap. Data compression favors the Core 9 273PQE by 34.8%, while floating point math shows a 46.4% difference and integer math a 40.6% difference. The smallest recorded gaps appear in random string sorting (10.7%) and single-threaded PassMark tests (9.7%), suggesting that the Core 9 273PQE’s advantage narrows in certain memory-latency-sensitive or lightly threaded scenarios, though it still wins.

The Core i5-14600, despite its lower scores, does have its own position in the market based on the database’s percentile data. Its 89th percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS with a negligible 0.5% average score difference. This indicates that the Core i5-14600 remains competitive within its own performance tier, even if it trails the Core 9 273PQE by a wide margin in these direct comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several foundational characteristics but diverge in key architectural details. Both use a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, and both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. Each processor includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, ECC memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, and both target the desktop market segment with active production status.

The most significant difference lies in the core and thread configuration. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 uses 14 cores and 20 threads. This means the Core i5-14600 has more physical cores, but the Core 9 273PQE has more threads due to its hyper-threading implementation across all cores. The Core 9 273PQE also runs at higher clock speeds, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, compared to the Core i5-14600’s 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost.

Cache allocation also differs. Both processors have 80 KB L1 cache per core and 2 MB L2 cache per core, but the shared L3 cache is 36 MB on the Core 9 273PQE versus 24 MB on the Core i5-14600. The Core i5-14600 has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9 273PQE does not have a die size listed in the database. The Core 9 273PQE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename and Core 9 generation, whereas the Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The release dates also differ, with the Core i5-14600 appearing in the database as released in early 2024 and the Core 9 273PQE dated to early 2026.

Power consumption shows a notable split. The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the Core i5-14600 is rated at 65 watts. This difference likely contributes to the performance gap, as the Core 9 273PQE draws more power to sustain higher clock speeds and thread counts. Memory bandwidth is recorded for the Core 9 273PQE at 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14600 has no memory bandwidth figure listed.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded benchmark data, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the superior processor in every measured category. Its average benchmark score of 66099 exceeds the Core i5-14600’s 44889 by roughly 47%, and its 93rd percentile ranking versus 89th percentile confirms its higher standing among all CPUs. Users prioritizing raw computational throughput, whether in rendering, encryption, or math-heavy tasks, will find the Core 9 273PQE delivers consistently higher results.

The Core i5-14600, however, occupies a different position. With a TDP of 65 watts compared to 125 watts, it draws less power while still achieving an 89th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS, sits within 0.5% of its average score, indicating that the Core i5-14600 holds its own against older high-end parts. For scenarios where power consumption is a primary constraint, the Core i5-14600’s lower TDP may be a deciding factor, though the database does not include direct power efficiency measurements.

The choice between these two processors depends on whether the performance gap justifies the higher TDP. The data shows the Core 9 273PQE wins all 17 head-to-head tests, so for maximum performance, it is the clear pick. The Core i5-14600 offers a lower power envelope and a lower launch MSRP of $255, but the Core 9 273PQE’s launch MSRP is $589. These figures are stated once here for reference, and the performance differential aligns with the price differential, though the database does not calculate performance per dollar.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE reaches 5.90 GHz boost clock, compared to 5.20 GHz for the Intel Core i5-14600.

Q: What is the L3 cache size difference?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has 24 MB.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i5-14600 support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: What is the largest recorded performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark extended instructions, where the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 38743 versus 25674 for the Intel Core i5-14600, a difference of 50.9%.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent pattern across all versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 3950 against 3070 for the Intel Core i5-14600, a 28.7% advantage. R15 singlecore results are 557 versus 433, also 28.6% higher. Cinebench R20 multicore records 16459 for the Core 9 273PQE and 12794 for the Core i5-14600, with a 28.6% gap. R20 singlecore shows 2323 versus 1806, again 28.6%. Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 39190 versus 30464, a 28.6% difference, while R23 singlecore comes in at 5532 versus 4300, a 28.7% gap. These rendering tests indicate that the Core 9 273PQE maintains a nearly uniform advantage in both multi-core and single-core scenarios.

PassMark tests reveal larger variations. Data compression scores 585752 for the Core 9 273PQE versus 434620 for the Core i5-14600, a 34.8% lead. Data encryption shows 29636 versus 25082, an 18.2% difference. Extended instructions produce the largest margin: 38743 versus 25674, a 50.9% gap. Prime number finding records 198 versus 155, a 27.7% difference. Floating point math achieves 125546 versus 85759, a 46.4% lead. Integer math reaches 164629 versus 117078, a 40.6% gap. The multithread test shows 46107 versus 35848, a 28.6% difference. Physics scores 2754 versus 2330, an 18.2% gap. Random string sorting delivers 53167 versus 48043, a smaller 10.7% difference. Single-thread tests record 4573 versus 4167, a 9.7% gap.

The narrowest margins appear in random string sorting and single-threaded PassMark tests, both below 11%. These results suggest that the Core 9 273PQE’s clock speed advantage translates less directly into memory-heavy or lightly threaded tasks, yet it still wins every time. The widest margins in extended instructions and floating point math indicate that the Core 9 273PQE’s architecture and thread count provide outsized benefits in computation-heavy workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. Core count: 12 cores for the Core 9 273PQE versus 14 cores for the Core i5-14600. Thread count: 24 threads versus 20. Base clock: 3.40 GHz versus 2.70 GHz. Boost clock: 5.90 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. TDP: 125 watts versus 65 watts. L3 cache: 36 MB shared versus 24 MB shared. Codename: Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-R. Generation: Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh). Release date: 2026-03-08 versus 2024-01-07. Launch MSRP: $589 versus $255. Die size: not recorded for the Core 9 273PQE, while the Core i5-14600 measures 257 mm². Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s for the Core 9 273PQE, not recorded for the Core i5-14600. Part numbers differ as SA4Q9 for the Core 9 273PQE and SRN44 for the Core i5-14600.

Shared specifications include socket type (Intel Socket 1700), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (2 MB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC memory support (true), PCIe (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlocked (false). Both processors come from Intel and support the same platform features, which simplifies comparisons since the motherboard compatibility is identical. The Core i5-14600’s lower TDP and earlier release date contrast with the Core 9 273PQE’s higher performance and later launch, but the core architectural relationship between the two remains rooted in the same 10 nm Intel process and Socket 1700 ecosystem.