Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear performance leader in every measurable category, with the database showing a substantial gap across all recorded workloads. The Core 9 273PQE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190, while the Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving the comparison entirely one-sided. The Core 9 273PQE also delivers a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5532, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16459, and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2323. In Cinebench R15, the Core 9 273PQE reaches 3950 multi-core and 557 single-core.

PassMark results for the Core 9 273PQE reinforce this dominance. The multi-thread score stands at 46107, while the single-thread score is 4573. Integer math processing reaches 164629, floating point math hits 125546, and extended instructions score 38743. Data compression workloads record 585752, data encryption reaches 29636, and random string sorting scores 53167. Physics processing lands at 2754, and the find prime numbers test produces a score of 198.

The percentile data places the Core 9 273PQE at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Core i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile. The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PQE is 66099, whereas the Core i5-14501TE has an average score of 0 due to the absence of recorded measurements.

Direct rival comparisons for the Core 9 273PQE show it trading blows with high-end parts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus records an average score of 66159, putting the Core 9 273PQE 0.1% behind. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with an average score of 65914, the Core 9 273PQE leads by 0.3%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus averages 66855, which is 1.1% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4465P averages 66925, also 1.1% higher. These margins are narrow, indicating the Core 9 273PQE performs at the upper tier of desktop processors despite not holding the absolute top position.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a common Intel Socket 1700 platform and both use a 10 nm process node from Intel's foundry, but their internal designs diverge significantly. The Core 9 273PQE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, while the Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i5 lineup under the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Core and thread counts differ sharply. The Core 9 273PQE provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i5-14501TE offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This doubling of resources directly explains the multi-core performance gap. Clock speeds also favor the Core 9 273PQE, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz versus 2.20 GHz for the Core i5-14501TE, and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz versus 5.10 GHz.

Cache configurations follow the same pattern. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. However, the L2 cache differs: the Core 9 273PQE has 2 MB per core, while the Core i5-14501TE has 1.25 MB per core. The shared L3 cache also favors the larger chip, with 36 MB on the Core 9 273PQE versus 24 MB on the Core i5-14501TE.

The Core i5-14501TE includes a die size measurement of 215 mm², while the Core 9 273PQE has no recorded die size. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and both include ECC memory support. The Core 9 273PQE records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14501TE has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and integrate UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking headroom is restricted on both parts.

The power envelope shows a major distinction. The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 W, while the Core i5-14501TE is rated at 45 W. This 80 W difference positions the Core i5-14501TE for lower-power configurations, while the Core 9 273PQE demands more substantial cooling and power delivery.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance?

A: The Core 9 273PQE dominates multi-core workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 39190, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 46107. The Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so a direct numerical comparison is not possible, but the Core 9 273PQE's 12 cores and 24 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads indicate a clear advantage.

Q: How does the Core 9 273PQE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 9 273PQE averages 66099 across all benchmark tests. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by 1.1% and the AMD EPYC 4465P by 1.2%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D by 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus by 0.1%. These are very small margins, placing the Core 9 273PQE in the same performance tier as these high-end parts.

Q: What are the cache size differences?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-14501TE also has 80 KB of L1 per core but only 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PQE therefore holds a 12 MB advantage in L3 cache and a larger per-core L2 allocation.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. Both also support ECC memory. The Core 9 273PQE records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14501TE has no bandwidth figure listed in the database.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 W, while the Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 W. This makes the Core i5-14501TE a lower-power option that requires less cooling, while the Core 9 273PQE needs a more robust thermal solution.

Q: Are the clock speeds significantly different?

A: Yes. The Core 9 273PQE runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts to 5.90 GHz. The Core i5-14501TE runs at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The Core 9 273PQE holds a 1.20 GHz base clock advantage and a 0.80 GHz boost clock advantage.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core 9 273PQE for any workload that depends on raw processing power. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, higher clock speeds, and larger cache hierarchy deliver benchmark results that place it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and PassMark multi-thread score of 46107 indicate a processor built for demanding multi-threaded applications. The 5.90 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 4573 in PassMark also make it strong for lightly threaded tasks.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, which limits any direct performance assessment. Its specifications indicate a more modest part: 6 cores, 12 threads, a 2.20 GHz base clock, and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The 45 W TDP makes it suitable for power-conscious builds, and the 24 MB L3 cache is adequate for mainstream workloads, but the absence of benchmark data prevents a quantitative comparison.

For users prioritizing maximum throughput in multi-core rendering, compilation, or data processing, the Core 9 273PQE is the only choice with recorded evidence. For users who require lower power consumption and a smaller footprint, the Core i5-14501TE offers a 45 W envelope that the Core 9 273PQE cannot match, but its performance ceiling is unverified in the database. The Core 9 273PQE also carries a launch MSRP of $589, while the Core i5-14501TE has no listed launch price.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences between the two processors are as follows. The Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a Core 9 generation label, while the Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename and a Core i5, Raptor Lake Refresh generation label. Core counts differ: 12 cores and 24 threads for the Core 9 273PQE versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the Core i5-14501TE.

Base clock speeds are 3.40 GHz versus 2.20 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.90 GHz versus 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 125 W for the Core 9 273PQE and 45 W for the Core i5-14501TE. The L2 cache per core is 2 MB versus 1.25 MB, and the shared L3 cache is 36 MB versus 24 MB. The Core 9 273PQE records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the Core i5-14501TE has no bandwidth figure. The Core i5-14501TE lists a die size of 215 mm², while the Core 9 273PQE has no die size recorded. Both share the same socket, process node, memory support, ECC capability, PCIe configuration, and integrated graphics.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins in every benchmark category with recorded data. Multi-core workloads show the largest advantage, with its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and PassMark multi-thread score of 46107 reflecting the doubling of cores and threads. Data compression at 585752, integer math at 164629, and floating point math at 125546 all point to strong performance in scientific computing, financial modeling, and content creation. The 5.90 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 4573 indicate solid performance in single-threaded applications like legacy software and certain game engines.

The Core i5-14501TE wins in power efficiency based on specification data. Its 45 W TDP is less than half the 125 W TDP of the Core 9 273PQE, making it suitable for compact systems, always-on servers, or environments with strict thermal constraints. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock still provides reasonable responsiveness, and the 24 MB L3 cache supports moderate multitasking. The lack of benchmark scores means its actual performance cannot be quantified, but the power envelope is the defining advantage.

The Core 9 273PQE also holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Core i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile gap reinforces the performance differential. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589, while the Core i5-14501TE has no launch price recorded, meaning any cost comparison is not possible from the available data.