Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i5-14500HX occupy different corners of the performance spectrum, and the benchmark data confirms a substantial gap between them. The Core 9 273PQE, a desktop part built on the Bartlett Lake platform, dominates nearly every recorded test, while the mobile-focused i5-14500HX delivers a more modest showing. The database records 17 benchmark wins for the Core 9 273PQE and zero for the i5-14500HX, a clean sweep that sets the tone for the entire comparison. The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PQE is 66099, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the i5-14500HX averages 35094, sitting at the 84th percentile. These figures frame a processor that is clearly aimed at high-end desktop workloads against a mobile chip designed for balanced performance in a more constrained power envelope.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head results is the consistency of the Core 9 273PQE's advantage. In the Cinebench suite, the desktop chip leads by a nearly uniform margin across all releases. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core 9 273PQE scores 3950 against 2442 for the i5-14500HX, a 61.8 percent advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar gap: 557 versus 344, a 61.9 percent lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 16459 against 10178, a 61.7 percent difference, while the single-core result is 2323 versus 1436, again 61.8 percent. Cinebench R23 follows the same pattern, with the Core 9 273PQE posting 39190 multicore and 5532 single-core, against 24234 and 3421 for the i5-14500HX, both results showing a 61.7 percent delta. This consistency across Cinebench versions indicates a stable architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

The PassMark suite reveals even larger gaps in some tests. The data compression test shows the Core 9 273PQE at 585752 versus 333851, a 75.5 percent lead. Floating point math results are similarly lopsided: 125546 versus 69442, a difference of 80.8 percent. The extended instructions test produces the largest margin of the entire comparison, with the Core 9 273PQE scoring 38743 against 20019, a 93.5 percent advantage. Integer math also skews heavily toward the desktop part, at 164629 versus 95584, a 72.2 percent lead. These specialized workloads amplify the raw throughput advantage that the Cinebench numbers already suggest.

Other tests show a smaller but still decisive gap. PassMark single-thread performance puts the Core 9 273PQE at 4573 against 3629, a 26 percent lead, the narrowest margin recorded. The physics test shows 2754 versus 1911, a 44.1 percent difference, and random string sorting comes in at 53167 versus 36219, a 46.8 percent gap. Data encryption shows 29636 versus 19502, a 52 percent difference, while the find prime numbers test records 198 versus 130, a 52.3 percent lead. The multithread test delivers 46107 versus 28508, a 61.7 percent advantage that mirrors the Cinebench multicore results. Across all 17 recorded head-to-head tests, the Core 9 273PQE leads in every single one, with margins ranging from 26 percent to 93.5 percent.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins across the board, but the magnitude of its advantage varies by workload type. In multi-threaded rendering tasks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39190 places it far ahead of the i5-14500HX's 24234. The desktop chip's 24 threads, combined with a 5.90 GHz boost clock, drive sustained throughput that the mobile part cannot match. The i5-14500HX, with 20 threads and a 4.90 GHz boost, still delivers respectable numbers for a 55 W mobile design, but it trails by roughly 62 percent in these heavily threaded workloads.

Single-thread performance tells a similar story, though the gap narrows. The Core 9 273PQE's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5532 is 61.7 percent higher than the i5-14500HX's 3421. In the PassMark single-thread test, the lead shrinks to 26 percent, with 4573 versus 3629. This suggests that the architectural differences matter more in sustained multi-core workloads than in short single-thread bursts, but the desktop part still holds a clear advantage in both.

Specialized compute tasks show the widest disparities. The extended instructions test, which measures SIMD and specialized instruction throughput, gives the Core 9 273PQE a 93.5 percent lead. Floating point math and data compression follow at 80.8 percent and 75.5 percent respectively. These results indicate that the Core 9 273PQE is particularly strong in scientific computing, data processing, and encryption or compression workloads. The i5-14500HX, by contrast, records its best relative performance in single-threaded tasks and physics simulation, where the 44.1 percent gap is the smallest among the non-single-thread tests. For a mobile processor, those results are competitive, but they do not change the overall picture.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX averages 35094.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Core 9 273PQE scores 39190 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 61.7 percent higher than the i5-14500HX's 24234.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the Core 9 273PQE scores 38743 against 20019, a 93.5 percent difference.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Intel Core i5-14500HX leads?

A: No, the database records zero wins for the i5-14500HX. The Core 9 273PQE wins all 17 head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: What is the smallest performance difference between the two?

A: The smallest margin is in the PassMark single-thread test, where the Core 9 273PQE scores 4573 versus 3629, a 26 percent lead.

Q: How do the two processors rank against all CPUs?

A: The Core 9 273PQE sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the i5-14500HX sits at the 84th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Core 9 273PQE uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i5-14500HX uses 14 cores and 20 threads. The desktop part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, compared to 2.60 GHz and 4.90 GHz for the mobile chip. Thermal design power differs significantly: the Core 9 273PQE is rated at 125 W, while the i5-14500HX is rated at 55 W. The Core 9 273PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, whereas the i5-14500HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The desktop part is marked as a Desktop segment product, while the i5-14500HX is marked as Mobile. The Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 24 MB for the i5-14500HX. The die size is listed for the i5-14500HX at 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 9 273PQE. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14500HX. The i5-14500HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 9 273PQE does not. Memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s for the Core 9 273PQE, with no figure recorded for the i5-14500HX. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel memory buses, ECC memory, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and UHD Graphics 770. The release dates differ as well, with the Core 9 273PQE released on 2026-03-08 and the i5-14500HX released on 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The Core 9 273PQE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, while the i5-14500HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with a Raptor Lake architecture. Both are manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. The Core 9 273PQE is part of the Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) generation, while the i5-14500HX is part of the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) generation. The cache hierarchy is identical in structure, with both using 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, but the shared L3 cache differs: 36 MB for the Core 9 273PQE versus 24 MB for the i5-14500HX. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, ECC memory, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are the same, with both using UHD Graphics 770. The production status for both is listed as Active. The i5-14500HX has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 9 273PQE has no die size listed. The market segments differ, with the Core 9 273PQE aimed at Desktop and the i5-14500HX aimed at Mobile, which explains the substantial differences in TDP and clock speeds despite the shared 10 nm process node.