Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete absence of direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i5-14401TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors stand at zero. This means no direct comparison scores exist in the database for these two specific models under identical test conditions.

However, the database does contain a full benchmark suite for the Core 9 273PQE, while the Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The Core 9 273PQE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and a single-core score of 5532. In Cinebench R20, it scores 16459 multi-core and 2323 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3950 multi-core and 557 single-core. PassMark results for the Core 9 273PQE include 46107 in multithread, 4573 in single-thread, 164629 in integer math, 125546 in floating point math, 585752 in data compression, and 29636 in data encryption.

The Core i5-14401TE has an empty benchmark array, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The Core 9 273PQE holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66099. Without any measured scores for the Core i5-14401TE, the database cannot establish a direct performance delta between the two processors. The lack of head-to-head data prevents any precise percentage comparison, but the Core 9 273PQE’s substantial benchmark output and high percentile placement indicate a wide margin over the Core i5-14401TE’s unmeasured baseline.

The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PQE provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores an average of 66159, which is 0.1% higher than the Core 9 273PQE. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, placing it 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855, a 1.1% advantage, and the AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925, a 1.2% advantage. These deltas show the Core 9 273PQE sits within a tight cluster of high-end processors, essentially matching or trailing its nearest rivals by roughly one percent or less. The Core i5-14401TE has no rival data, so its relative standing cannot be assessed beyond its 50th percentile placement, which is a median position.

The Verdict

The data indicates a decisive performance hierarchy between these two processors, but only for the Core 9 273PQE. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.90 GHz boost clock, deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Core i5-14401TE offers 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.50 GHz boost clock, yet the database contains no benchmark results for it. Its 50th percentile ranking is a default median value, not a measured outcome.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded throughput, such as video rendering, compilation, or simulation, the Core 9 273PQE’s recorded scores demonstrate far higher capacity. The PassMark multithread score of 46107 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 reflect a processor designed for heavy parallel tasks. The Core i5-14401TE, with half the cores and half the threads, would logically fall far short, but the database offers no numbers to confirm this. For single-threaded tasks, the Core 9 273PQE’s 5532 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4573 in PassMark single-thread show strong per-core performance, driven by its 5.90 GHz boost capability. The Core i5-14401TE’s 4.50 GHz boost suggests a lower ceiling, but again, no measured data exists.

The Core i5-14401TE targets a different power envelope, with a 45 watt TDP versus the Core 9 273PQE’s 125 watts. This indicates a preference for lower energy consumption and potentially quieter cooling, but the trade-off in performance is not quantified in the database. The Core 9 273PQE also carries a launch MSRP of $589, while the Core i5-14401TE has no listed launch price. The verdict from the data is clear: the Core 9 273PQE is the superior performer across every recorded metric, while the Core i5-14401TE remains an unmeasured entity with a median default percentile. Users seeking maximum compute capability from the recorded data should choose the Core 9 273PQE. Users prioritizing lower power draw would consider the Core i5-14401TE, but the database provides no evidence of its actual performance level.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PQE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, the Core 9 273PQE has extensive scores, including 39190 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 5532 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 46107 in PassMark multithread, and 4573 in PassMark single-thread.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the Core i5-14401TE has an empty benchmark array. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, which appears to be a default median value rather than a measured result.

Q: How does the Core 9 273PQE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus is 0.1% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 0.3% lower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is 1.1% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4465P is 1.2% higher.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, and the Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock for the Core 9 273PQE is 3.40 GHz, and for the Core i5-14401TE it is 2.00 GHz. The boost clock is 5.90 GHz on the Core 9 273PQE and 4.50 GHz on the Core i5-14401TE. The TDP is 125 watts for the Core 9 273PQE and 45 watts for the Core i5-14401TE.

The L2 cache differs: the Core 9 273PQE has 2 MB per core, while the Core i5-14401TE has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PQE and 20 MB shared on the Core i5-14401TE. The integrated graphics also differ, with the Core 9 273PQE using UHD Graphics 770 and the Core i5-14401TE using UHD Graphics 730. The Core 9 273PQE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14401TE has no recorded memory bandwidth value. The die size is only listed for the Core i5-14401TE at 215 mm², with no die size for the Core 9 273PQE. The Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589, and the Core i5-14401TE has no launch MSRP. The part numbers also differ: the Core 9 273PQE is SA4Q9, and the Core i5-14401TE is Q4T4SRNJP.

Architecture Differences

The Core 9 273PQE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed under “Core 9 (Bartlett Lake)” generation, while the Core i5-14401TE is based on Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R and the generation “Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)”. Both processors use a 10 nm process node and are fabricated by Intel. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and have PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The cache architecture differs in L2 and L3 sizes. The Core 9 273PQE offers 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3, while the Core i5-14401TE offers 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The release dates differ: the Core 9 273PQE was released on 2026-03-08, and the Core i5-14401TE was released on 2024-06-30. The Core 9 273PQE has no listed architecture field, but its codename and generation indicate Bartlett Lake, which is distinct from the Raptor Lake refresh used in the Core i5-14401TE. Both processors are desktop market segments, are active in production, and have locked multipliers. The integrated graphics differ as noted, with UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 730.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its 12 cores and 24 threads give it a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190 and PassMark multithread score of 46107. Tasks such as 3D rendering, video encoding, batch image processing, and scientific computing would benefit from this parallel capacity. The PassMark integer math score of 164629 and floating point math score of 125546 further confirm strength in compute-heavy applications. The data compression score of 585752 and random string sorting score of 53167 indicate strong performance in data manipulation and archival workloads. The single-thread scores, including Cinebench R23 single-core at 5532 and PassMark single-thread at 4573, show that the Core 9 273PQE also leads in lightly threaded tasks, likely due to its 5.90 GHz boost clock. This processor wins in productivity, content creation, and heavy multitasking scenarios.

The Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark wins because the database contains no measured scores for it. Its theoretical advantage lies in power efficiency, with a 45 watt TDP compared to the Core 9 273PQE’s 125 watts. This suggests it would win in scenarios where low power draw is a priority, such as compact desktop systems, always-on servers, or environments with strict thermal limits. The smaller 215 mm² die size and 20 MB of shared L3 cache also indicate a more modest silicon footprint. However, without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm any performance win for the Core i5-14401TE. The Core 9 273PQE wins in all measured performance categories, while the Core i5-14401TE wins only in the unmeasured domain of power consumption, based on the TDP figures.