Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core 9 273PQE has exactly double the core and thread count of the i5-110.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The Core i5-110 has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core 9 273PQE runs at higher frequencies in both states.

Q: Which processor has the larger cache?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per core of L2 cache. The Core i5-110 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 256 KB per core of L2 cache. The Core 9 273PQE also has 80 KB per core of L1 cache versus 64 KB per core on the i5-110.

Q: What memory standards do they support?

A: The Core 9 273PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Core i5-110 supports only DDR4 memory, also dual-channel, with 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core 9 273PQE also supports ECC memory, which the i5-110 does not.

Q: How do the integrated graphics differ?

A: The Core 9 273PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core i5-110 uses UHD Graphics 630.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Core 9 273PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200. They are not socket-compatible with each other.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lines and process nodes. The Core 9 273PQE is built on the 10 nm process with the codename Bartlett Lake, classified in the Core 9 generation. The Core i5-110 uses the 14 nm process with the Comet Lake architecture, classified in the Core i5 generation. Both are manufactured by Intel, but the difference in process node indicates a substantial generational gap in transistor density and power characteristics.

The Core 9 273PQE doubles the core count of the i5-110, offering 12 cores and 24 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads. The cache hierarchy also differs significantly. The Core 9 273PQE has 80 KB per core of L1 cache and 2 MB per core of L2 cache, while the i5-110 has 64 KB per core of L1 and 256 KB per core of L2. The shared L3 cache is 36 MB on the Core 9 273PQE versus 12 MB on the i5-110. That is a 24 MB difference in shared cache alone.

Connectivity and platform support differ as well. The Core 9 273PQE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, whereas the i5-110 supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. Memory support is another differentiator: the Core 9 273PQE accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, while the i5-110 is limited to DDR4. The Core 9 273PQE also offers ECC memory support, a feature absent on the i5-110. The memory bandwidth figures reflect this, with the Core 9 273PQE delivering 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s on the i5-110.

The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the i5-110 has a 65 watt TDP. The Core 9 273PQE also carries a different part number, SA4Q9, against SA35X for the i5-110. Both processors are multiplier-locked, meaning neither offers unlocked overclocking. The Core 9 273PQE was released on March 8, 2026, and the i5-110 on September 10, 2025.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i5-110. The i5-110 has an empty benchmark record with an average score of zero, and no individual test scores are recorded for it. As a result, the comparison relies on the broader scored data for the Core 9 273PQE and the percentile positions of each processor.

The Core 9 273PQE records a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. The i5-110 sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap places the Core 9 273PQE in the top tier of desktop processors, while the i5-110 lands in the middle of the distribution.

The Core 9 273PQE posts strong multi-threaded results across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 3950; in R20 multicore, 16459; and in R23 multicore, 39190. Single-core scores are 557 in R15, 2323 in R20, and 5532 in R23. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 46107 and a single-thread score of 4573. Data compression delivers 585752, data encryption 29636, extended instructions 38743, floating point math 125546, integer math 164629, physics 2754, and random string sorting 53167. The find prime numbers score is 198.

The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PQE give context for its position. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus has an average score of 66159, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Core 9 273PQE's 66099. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914 on average, 0.3 percent lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus averages 66855, 1.1 percent higher, and the AMD EPYC 4465P averages 66925, 1.2 percent higher. The Core 9 273PQE sits within a tight band around these processors, within roughly 1.2 percent of each one. That grouping indicates the Core 9 273PQE competes at the level of those high-end desktop and workstation parts despite differences in architecture and market positioning.

The i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only comparative data point available. The absence of test results means the database cannot produce a direct score-based head-to-head comparison. The specification differences, however, show a clear structural gap between the two processors.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PQE | Intel Core i5-110 |

|-------------------|---------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 6 |

| Threads | 24 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.90 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2025-09-10 |

| Launch MSRP | $589 | $200 |

| Part Number | SA4Q9 | SA35X |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

The table shows the Core 9 273PQE leads in every compute resource category. It has more cores, more threads, higher clocks, larger caches, newer memory support, and a newer PCIe standard. The i5-110 counters with a lower TDP of 65 watts versus 125 watts, which indicates lower power draw. The launch MSRP for the Core 9 273PQE is $589, and the i5-110 is $200.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins on raw compute capacity. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.90 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, give it the structural advantage for multi-threaded workloads. The recorded benchmark scores show strong results in Cinebench R23 multicore at 39190 and PassMark multithread at 46107. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms its position among high-performance desktop processors. Applications that scale across threads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, would benefit from the core count and cache size. The DDR5 memory support and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth further support memory-intensive work.

The i5-110 wins on power efficiency by specification. Its 65 watt TDP is almost half the 125 watt TDP of the Core 9 273PQE. For systems where heat output and power draw are primary constraints, the i5-110 presents a lighter load on the platform. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for general desktop work, and the 50th percentile ranking places it at the midpoint of the database. The lower launch MSRP of $200 positions it in a different market segment, though pricing should not be the deciding factor in this analysis.

The Core 9 273PQE also wins on platform modernity. It uses Socket 1700, supports PCIe Gen 5, accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, and includes ECC memory support. The i5-110 uses Socket 1200, PCIe Gen 3, and DDR4 only. These differences affect upgrade paths and peripheral compatibility. The Core 9 273PQE's UHD Graphics 770 is a newer integrated GPU than the i5-110's UHD Graphics 630, which gives it an edge for systems relying on integrated graphics output.

The Verdict

The data shows a wide gap between the Intel Core 9 273PQE and the Intel Core i5-110. The Core 9 273PQE doubles the core and thread counts, runs at higher clocks, carries substantially more cache, supports newer memory and PCIe standards, and ranks 43 percentile points higher in the database. Its benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark confirm strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Core 9 273PQE is the appropriate choice for workloads that demand high sustained compute throughput.

The i5-110 offers a 65 watt TDP and the 50th percentile ranking. Its recorded data is limited, with no benchmark scores in the database. The specification sheet shows a capable 6-core, 12-thread processor on the Comet Lake architecture, but the absence of scores prevents a quantitative performance assessment. The i5-110 fits systems with lower power budgets and lighter compute demands.

The decision between the two comes down to the workload and platform requirements. The Core 9 273PQE is the stronger compute part by every measured resource in the database. The i5-110 is the lower-power part with a simpler platform footprint. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. The socket mismatch means a motherboard choice must be made early, as Socket 1700 and Socket 1200 boards are not interchangeable.