Intel Core 9 273PQE vs Intel Core i3-14100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive and consistent picture: the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every single recorded comparison, taking all 17 head-to-head tests. The gap is not marginal; it is structural, with the Core 9 273PQE delivering multi-core results that are roughly three times higher than the Core i3-14100 across several workloads.

In Cinebench testing, the difference is stark. The Core 9 273PQE scores 3,950 in Cinebench R15 multi-core against 1,292 for the i3-14100, a 205.7% advantage. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 16,459 versus 5,384, also a 205.7% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows the same pattern: 39,190 for the Core 9 273PQE versus 12,820 for the i3-14100, again a 205.7% edge. Single-core Cinebench results are similarly lopsided, with the Core 9 273PQE leading by 206% in R15 single-core (557 vs 182), 206.1% in R20 single-core (2,323 vs 759), and 205.8% in R23 single-core (5,532 vs 1,809). This consistent 205% margin across every Cinebench iteration indicates a fundamental throughput difference rather than workload-specific behavior.

PassMark integer math shows the Core 9 273PQE at 164,629 versus 45,329 for the i3-14100, a 263.2% advantage, the largest multi-core delta in the dataset. Floating point math follows closely at 256% (125,546 vs 35,266). Prime number finding shows a 260% difference (198 vs 55). Data compression and encryption also favor the Core 9 273PQE heavily: 585,752 versus 174,115 in compression (236.4%) and 29,636 versus 8,838 in encryption (235.3%). Extended instruction throughput is 38,743 versus 11,865, a 226.5% lead. Random string sorting comes in at 53,167 versus 17,397, a 205.6% gap. PassMark multi-thread results show 46,107 versus 15,095, a 205.4% difference, while physics simulation is 2,754 versus 958, a 187.5% lead, the narrowest multi-core margin in the entire comparison.

The only test where the Core 9 273PQE advantage shrinks to a modest level is PassMark single-thread: 4,573 versus 3,759, a 21.7% lead. That result matters, because it isolates per-core capability. The Core 9 273PQE still wins, but the gap is far smaller, indicating that the i3-14100's individual cores are reasonably capable while its overall throughput is limited by core count and thread count.

The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PQE is 66,099, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The i3-14100 averages 18,318, sitting at the 72nd percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PQE are the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus at 66,159 (0.1% below), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914 (0.3% above), the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at 66,855 (1.1% below), and the AMD EPYC 4465P at 66,925 (1.2% below). The Core 9 273PQE sits in a tightly packed performance band, effectively trading blows with those processors. The i3-14100's nearest rivals are the Intel Core 3 305 at 18,302 (0.1% above), the Intel Core 5 330 at 18,345 (0.1% below), the Intel Core 7 360 at 18,374 (0.3% below), and the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18,380 (0.3% below). The i3-14100 is essentially tied with those parts, confirming its position as an entry-level desktop processor.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PQE wins everywhere in this direct comparison, but the magnitude of the win varies by workload type. The largest advantages appear in integer math (263.2%), floating point math (256%), and prime number finding (260%), all of which scale with core count and sustained multi-threaded execution. These are compute-heavy tasks that fully utilize available cores, and the Core 9 273PQE's 12 cores and 24 threads provide far more parallel capacity than the i3-14100's 4 cores and 8 threads.

Data compression and encryption also heavily favor the Core 9 273PQE at 236.4% and 235.3% respectively. These workloads benefit from both core count and memory bandwidth, and the Core 9 273PQE's larger L3 cache and higher memory bandwidth support that result. The i3-14100's smaller cache and unspecified memory bandwidth leave it at a clear disadvantage in these tasks.

The Core 9 273PQE wins the single-threaded comparison as well, but only by 21.7%. That indicates the i3-14100 is not far behind in lightly threaded scenarios such as older applications, basic office work, or single-threaded legacy software. For users whose workloads are dominated by a few threads, the i3-14100 remains serviceable, though the Core 9 273PQE still holds the lead.

The i3-14100's only practical advantage in the data is its 60 W TDP versus the Core 9 273PQE's 125 W TDP, a 65 W difference. That makes the i3-14100 the more power-efficient choice for systems where thermal output and cooling complexity are primary concerns. It also carries a lower launch MSRP of $134, while the Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589. The data does not include efficiency measurements, so direct performance-per-watt comparisons cannot be made, but the TDP figures alone indicate a substantially lighter thermal footprint.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's 10 nm process node and are built by Intel, but they differ significantly in core configuration and cache layout. The Core 9 273PQE is part of the Bartlett Lake generation with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i3-14100 belongs to the Core 14th Gen Raptor Lake Refresh series with 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The i3-14100 has a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Cache configurations diverge sharply. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: 2 MB per core on the Core 9 273PQE versus 1.25 MB per core on the i3-14100. L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PQE versus 12 MB shared on the i3-14100. The Core 9 273PQE's larger L3 cache is three times the size of the i3-14100's, which directly supports its superior performance in cache-sensitive workloads like data compression and encryption.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 9 273PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i3-14100 uses UHD Graphics 730. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 9 273PQE has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i3-14100's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both use Intel Socket 1700 and provide Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU only. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 9 273PQE's part number is SA4Q9, while the i3-14100's is SRMX1. The i3-14100 has a die size of 163 mm²; the Core 9 273PQE's die size is not recorded. Both are listed as Active production status and target the Desktop market segment.

The Core 9 273PQE was released on 2026-03-08, while the i3-14100 was released on 2024-01-07. The release date gap is substantial, and the newer Bartlett Lake architecture brings a significantly different core topology than the older Raptor Lake-R design.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core 9 273PQE in multi-core workloads?

A: The Core 9 273PQE leads by roughly 205% across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, and by 263.2% in PassMark integer math. PassMark multi-thread shows a 205.4% advantage, while the smallest multi-core margin is 187.5% in PassMark physics.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-14100 win any benchmark?

A: No. The Core 9 273PQE wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons recorded in the database. The i3-14100's closest result is PassMark single-thread, where it trails by 21.7% (3,759 vs 4,573).

Q: What is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The Core 9 273PQE leads by 21.7% in PassMark single-thread (4,573 vs 3,759). In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 9 273PQE scores 5,532 versus 1,809 for the i3-14100, a 205.8% lead.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i3-14100 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Core 9 273PQE also has 36 MB of shared L3 cache versus 12 MB on the i3-14100.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 9 273PQE records 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the i3-14100's bandwidth is not listed.

Q: What are the TDP values?

A: The Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125 W, and the i3-14100 has a TDP of 60 W. The i3-14100's lower TDP indicates a lighter cooling requirement.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation in performance class. The Core 9 273PQE is positioned at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 66,099, placing it alongside the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K-series parts, all within roughly 1.2% of each other. The i3-14100 sits at the 72nd percentile with an average score of 18,318, tied with the Intel Core 3 305, Core 5 330, Core 7 360, and Core i3-13100. These are two different tiers of desktop computing, and the benchmark results reflect that.

Buyers choosing between these two should base the decision on workload scale and system constraints. The Core 9 273PQE is the correct choice for multi-threaded rendering, compilation, data processing, and any workload that can use more than 8 threads. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 36 MB L3 cache, and higher boost clock of 5.90 GHz translate directly into the 187% to 263% advantages seen across PassMark and Cinebench tests. The i3-14100, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, is limited to roughly one-third of the multi-core throughput, and no workload in the dataset flips the result.

The i3-14100's case rests on its 60 W TDP and lower launch MSRP of $134, which make it a reasonable fit for compact systems, basic office builds, or users who do not need the Core 9 273PQE's massive thread count. Its single-thread score of 3,759 is respectable, and for light workloads the 21.7% single-thread deficit to the Core 9 273PQE is far less punishing than the multi-core gap. The Core 9 273PQE, with a launch MSRP of $589, demands a more substantial cooling solution and power delivery, and its 125 W TDP should be factored into any build plan.

For users who already know their workloads are heavily threaded, the Core 9 273PQE is the only rational pick in this comparison. For users whose workloads are light and who prioritize a low-power, low-cost platform, the i3-14100 offers a functional baseline, but the benchmark record shows it cannot keep pace in any measured category.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category. Core count: 12 on the Core 9 273PQE versus 4 on the i3-14100. Thread count: 24 versus 8. Base clock: 3.40 GHz on the Core 9 273PQE versus 3.50 GHz on the i3-14100. Boost clock: 5.90 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP: 125 W versus 60 W. L2 cache: 2 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache: 36 MB shared versus 12 MB shared. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 730. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s on the Core 9 273PQE, not recorded for the i3-14100. Generation: Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh). Codename: Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-R. Die size: not recorded for the Core 9 273PQE versus 163 mm² for the i3-14100. Release date: 2026-03-08 versus 2024-01-07. Launch MSRP: $589 versus $134. Part number: SA4Q9 versus SRMX1.

Both processors share the same socket (Intel Socket 1700), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), memory support (DDR4 and DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (true on both), PCIe configuration (Gen 5, 16 lanes from CPU only), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier lock (both locked).