AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE
Core 9 273PQE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE vs Intel Core 9 273PQE
The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE and the Intel Core 9 273PQE occupy entirely different positions in the desktop processor landscape. The database contains benchmark results for the Intel part only, while the AMD processor has no recorded scores, making a direct numeric comparison impossible. However, the architectural specifications and the Intel chip’s measured performance relative to its nearest rivals provide a clear picture of what each processor delivers.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 9 273PQE is designed for high-throughput, multi-threaded workloads. Its recorded benchmark scores are substantial: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,190 and a PassMark multithread score of 46,107 place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. This processor excels in tasks that scale with core count, such as rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations. Its 12 cores and 24 threads give it a decisive advantage in parallel workloads, and the data confirms this with an average benchmark score of 66,099.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE, by contrast, is a 35-watt part with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its entire design philosophy centers on efficiency. With a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, it delivers solid single-threaded performance for a low-power chip. The 35-watt TDP makes it suitable for compact, thermally constrained systems. The absence of benchmark scores in the database means its exact performance level is unmeasured, but its specifications suggest it wins in scenarios where power draw and heat output are the primary constraints, not raw throughput.
The AMD chip also wins on platform flexibility. It supports DDR4 memory, which is mature and widely available. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving it broader memory options but also requiring a more modern platform. The Intel chip’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes offers double the bandwidth of the AMD chip’s PCIe Gen 3 interface, making the Intel part better suited for high-speed storage and advanced GPUs.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different manufacturing generations and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. This chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a die measuring 180 mm². The smaller process node and focused design contribute to its low power consumption. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with 512 shaders, a capable solution for basic display output and light compute.
The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture, a 10 nm process manufactured by Intel. The database lists no transistor count or die size for this part, but its cache structure is notably larger: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache. This larger cache pool helps feed the 12 cores and 24 threads, particularly in workloads that repeatedly access the same data. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which handles media playback and general desktop tasks.
Memory support differs significantly. The AMD chip is limited to DDR4 with dual-channel operation and a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s when using DDR5. This bandwidth advantage matters in memory-intensive applications like large dataset processing and integrated graphics workloads. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the AMD chip, which matters for stability in professional or server-adjacent use cases.
The Intel processor has a locked multiplier, while the AMD chip is multiplier unlocked. This means the AMD part can be overclocked by the user, potentially closing some performance gaps despite its lower base power envelope. The Intel part, with a 125-watt TDP, runs hot and requires robust cooling, whereas the AMD part’s 35-watt TDP is manageable with modest cooling solutions.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors are not recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE has no benchmark entries, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. Therefore, the following analysis relies on the Intel chip’s measured scores and its position relative to similar processors.
The Intel Core 9 273PQE’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,190 is a strong indicator of its rendering performance. Its single-core score of 5,532 in the same test confirms that it also handles lightly threaded tasks well, aided by a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 16,459 and single-core is 2,323. The older Cinebench R15 shows 3,950 multi-core and 557 single-core, maintaining a consistent performance trajectory across generations of the benchmark.
PassMark results for the Intel chip show a balanced profile. The multithread score of 46,107 is high, but the integer math score of 164,629 and floating point math score of 125,546 reveal where the strength lies: integer-heavy workloads benefit the most. Data compression scores 585,752, which is a massive figure, indicating strong performance in archive creation and database operations. Data encryption scores 29,636, and extended instructions score 38,743, both showing capable but not extraordinary results. Physics simulation scores 2,754, which is moderate. Random string sorting scores 53,167, and the single-thread score is 4,573.
The nearest rivals to the Intel chip in the database are the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, and the AMD EPYC 4465P. The Core 9 273PQE’s average score of 66,099 is essentially tied with the Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus at 66,159, a delta of -0.1 percent. It is slightly ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914, a delta of 0.3 percent. Against the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at 66,855, it trails by 1.1 percent, and against the EPYC 4465P at 66,925, it trails by 1.2 percent. These margins are small, confirming that the Core 9 273PQE is competitive with high-end desktop and workstation parts from the same generation.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE has no percentile ranking or average score in the database, so its standing relative to the Intel chip cannot be quantified. Its 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a placeholder value, not a measured result.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: What is the difference in cache size between the two?
A: The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE does not.
Q: What is the power consumption difference?
A: The AMD chip has a 35-watt TDP. The Intel chip has a 125-watt TDP.
Q: Does the AMD processor have an unlocked multiplier?
A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core 9 273PQE does not.
Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals in average score?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE averages 66,099. The Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66,159, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65,914, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66,855, and the EPYC 4465P scores 66,925.
The Verdict
The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput. Its benchmark scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 39,190 and PassMark multithread of 46,107, place it among the top processors in the database, ranking in the 93rd percentile. The 12 cores, 24 threads, and 36 MB of L3 cache are built for heavy parallel workloads. The 5.90 GHz boost clock also ensures strong single-threaded performance, as shown by the 5,532 single-core score in Cinebench R23. Its DDR5 support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity make it suitable for a modern high-end system. The launch MSRP is $589.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5705GE is for a different audience. Its 35-watt TDP, 8 cores, and 16 threads target systems where power efficiency is paramount. The 7 nm process, 16 MB L3, and DDR4 support make it a cost-effective, low-heat solution for compact desktops or always-on machines. The unlocked multiplier offers overclocking headroom, and the 4.60 GHz boost clock provides respectable single-threaded performance for everyday tasks. The database does not record any benchmark scores for this part, so its absolute performance is unverified, but its specifications clearly favor efficiency over raw compute.
The data indicates that these processors do not compete for the same buyer. The Intel chip is a high-performance workstation part with a substantial power draw and premium feature set. The AMD chip is a low-power desktop processor that prioritizes thermal and electrical efficiency. Users with rendering, simulation, or heavy multitasking needs should select the Intel processor. Users with space and power constraints, or those building a quiet, low-consumption system, should select the AMD processor. The recorded performance data overwhelmingly favors Intel, but the AMD chip’s design goals are orthogonal to that measurement.