AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and the Intel Core 9 273PQE occupy different ends of the desktop spectrum, with the data showing a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel part holds a significant overall advantage, winning 10 of the 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD processor secures a single, but notable, victory. This analysis breaks down the recorded benchmark data, architectural differences, and specification gaps to determine where each processor fits.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for the Intel Core 9 273PQE comes in floating-point math, where it scores 125,546 against the Ryzen 5 9500F's 56,570. This represents a 54.9% advantage, the largest delta in the comparison. The Intel processor demonstrates a similar, though slightly smaller, edge in integer math, scoring 164,629 versus 84,198, a difference of 48.9%. These results indicate a substantial throughput advantage in compute-heavy workloads.

The Intel part also dominates in data compression and encryption. In the data compression test, it scores 585,752 compared to the AMD's 325,678, a 44.4% lead. For data encryption, the Intel processor scores 29,636 against 15,716, which is a 47% advantage. These figures suggest the Intel architecture handles these specific data-processing tasks with considerably more efficiency.

Multithreaded performance follows the same pattern. The Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 46,107 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 28,312, a 38.6% deficit for the AMD chip. This is consistent with the Intel part's higher core count and thread count. The physics test also favors Intel, with a score of 2,754 versus 1,851, a 32.8% lead. Random string sorting shows a 35.7% advantage for Intel, with scores of 53,167 and 34,174 respectively.

The Intel processor wins the extended instructions test by a 31.9% margin, scoring 38,743 against 26,370. Even in single-threaded performance, where the AMD chip's higher base clock might suggest competitiveness, the Intel part leads, scoring 4,573 versus 4,258, a 6.9% advantage. This is the closest of the Intel victories, but it still goes to the Intel side.

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F's only win is in the prime number search test. It scores 220, which is 11.1% higher than the Intel part's 198. While a single win in a specialized task does not offset the Intel processor's dominance in the other ten tests, it does indicate a specific algorithmic strength where the AMD architecture is more efficient.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a significantly higher average benchmark score of 66,099, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F's 52,873. The Intel part also holds a higher percentile rank, sitting in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip is in the 91st percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core 9 273PQE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The recorded data shows the Intel Core 9 273PQE scores 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, which has an average score of 65,914. It also outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus, which has an average score of 66,159, by 0.1%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which has an average score of 66,855, by 1.1%.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F?

A: The database places the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F within a tight cluster of competitors. Its average score of 52,873 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52,901), 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 634 (52,974), 0.6% lower than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206), and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the AMD processor wins the PassMark find prime numbers test, scoring 220 against the Intel part's 198. This is an 11.1% advantage and represents its only head-to-head victory out of the eleven tests recorded.

Q: What is the difference in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE holds the edge in single-threaded performance, scoring 4,573 in the PassMark single-thread test. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 4,258, which puts it 6.9% behind the Intel processor.

Q: Which processor has a larger cache?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a larger shared L3 cache at 36 MB, compared to the 32 MB shared L3 cache on the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F. The Intel part also has a larger L2 cache per core, at 2 MB, compared to the AMD's 1 MB per core, while both have the same 80 KB L1 cache per core.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. This difference in process node is a key factor in the power and efficiency profiles of the two chips, though the Intel part compensates with a higher core count.

The AMD processor is a 6-core, 12-thread part, while the Intel processor is a 12-core, 24-thread part. This doubling of cores and threads is the primary driver of the Intel part's large lead in multithreaded workloads. The AMD chip's smaller core count is paired with a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz, while the Intel part has a lower base clock of 3.40 GHz but a much higher boost clock of 5.90 GHz compared to the AMD's 5.00 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core, double the AMD's 1 MB per core. The Intel processor also has a larger shared L3 cache at 36 MB, while the AMD chip has 32 MB. The AMD chip has a smaller die size of 70.6 mm² and 8,315 million transistors, whereas the Intel processor's die size and transistor count are not recorded in the database.

The AMD processor supports only DDR5 memory, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel and have the same recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both processors also support ECC memory. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The most apparent difference is in core and thread counts: the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock of 5.90 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, although the AMD chip has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 3.40 GHz.

The thermal design power (TDP) differs significantly, with the AMD chip rated at 65 watts and the Intel chip rated at 125 watts. The two processors are built on different sockets, with the AMD part using AMD Socket AM5 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel processor includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD processor has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

PCIe support differs, with the AMD processor offering Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel processor offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel processor's multiplier is locked. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has a launch MSRP of $219. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a launch MSRP of $589. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear winner for any workload that benefits from parallel processing. Its 12 cores and 24 threads deliver a decisive advantage in multithreaded benchmarks, with a 38.6% lead in the PassMark multithread test. It also leads heavily in floating-point math, integer math, and data compression, making it the stronger choice for content creation, scientific computing, and data-heavy tasks. Its higher boost clock also gives it a slight edge in single-threaded performance, so it does not sacrifice responsiveness in lighter tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F's single benchmark victory in the prime number search test points to a specific area of algorithmic strength. While it loses most tests by wide margins, its 11.1% lead in this specific task suggests that certain workloads, particularly those involving prime number generation or similar mathematical operations, may run relatively better on the AMD architecture. However, this is a narrow win. The AMD processor also has a significantly lower TDP of 65 watts, which indicates a more power-efficient design for users prioritizing lower power draw.

The AMD chip occupies a different market position based on its lower launch MSRP and lower TDP. It offers a 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, which is a capable desktop processor. The Intel part, with its higher core count, higher boost clock, and larger cache, is positioned as a higher-performance part, reflected in its higher launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the higher-performing processor in nearly every measurable category. Its wins in 10 of the 11 head-to-head tests, including a 54.9% lead in floating-point math and a 38.6% lead in multithreaded performance, make it the obvious choice for users who require maximum throughput. The Intel processor's higher percentile ranking (93rd vs 91st) and higher average benchmark score (66,099 vs 52,873) confirm its position above the AMD part in the database's performance hierarchy.

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is the more power-efficient option, with a 65-watt TDP compared to the Intel's 125 watts. It also has a lower launch MSRP of $219, positioning it as a more accessible entry point. Its single win in the prime number test shows it has some unique strengths, but it is not competitive with the Intel part in the majority of workloads. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the choice for users who need the highest level of performance, while the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F serves as a lower-power, lower-cost alternative with a solid 6-core foundation.