Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 360 and Intel Processor 300T occupy very different positions in the database, and the recorded data shows a decisive performance gap. The Core 7 360 has a full benchmark suite with 17 recorded results, while the Processor 300T has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of recorded data for the Processor 300T means direct score comparisons are impossible; the analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences.

The Core 7 360 posts an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380 and a delta of 0, the Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 with a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 with a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 with a delta of 0.4 percent. These deltas indicate the Core 7 360 is effectively tied with that cluster of processors, sitting within half a percent of each one. The performance envelope is therefore comparable to those quad-core desktop parts, even though the Core 7 360 is a mobile chip.

In Cinebench tests, the Core 7 360 delivers a multi-core score of 13634 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 1924 in the same test. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 5726 and single-core is 808. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 1374 and single-core is 193. These results show a chip that scales well across both lightly threaded and fully loaded workloads.

PassMark results for the Core 7 360 further characterize its strengths. The multi-thread score is 15544, while single-thread is 4274. Integer math scores 34238, floating point math scores 44963, and extended instructions score 12390. Data compression reaches 142877, data encryption reaches 11164, and random string sorting reaches 17636. Find prime numbers scores 120, and physics scores 1213.

The Processor 300T, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile rank is 50, which reflects its position relative to all CPUs but is not derived from any measured workload results in this dataset. Without recorded scores, no head-to-head delta can be stated for any individual test.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 7 360 wins every workload category where data exists, simply because it is the only one of the two with recorded measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13634 indicates strong sustained throughput for rendering and heavily threaded productivity tasks. The single-core score of 1924 in the same test shows solid responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The PassMark integer math score of 34238 and floating point math score of 44963 point to capable general computation, while data compression at 142877 and data encryption at 11164 suggest strong performance in archive handling and cryptography workloads.

The Processor 300T cannot be assigned wins in any benchmark category, as the database contains no scores for it. However, the specification data allows some qualitative distinctions. The Processor 300T uses a dual-channel memory bus, while the Core 7 360 uses a single-channel bus. This means the Processor 300T has a structural advantage in memory bandwidth availability, even though no bandwidth figure is recorded for it. The Processor 300T also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core 7 360 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. For systems that rely on existing DDR4 memory, the Processor 300T is the only one of the two that fits that configuration.

The Core 7 360 has a higher core count with 6 cores and 6 threads versus 2 cores and 4 threads for the Processor 300T. The Core 7 360 also has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz, while the Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock. The Core 7 360 uses a 3 nm process node, while the Processor 300T uses a 10 nm node. The Core 7 360 has a larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core versus 80 KB per core, and a larger L2 cache at 2.5 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core. Both share 6 MB of L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core 7 360 for any user who needs measured performance. It has a complete benchmark record, an average score of 18374, and sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4 percent of its average score, which means it performs on par with established quad-core desktop processors like the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i3-14100. The Core 7 360 is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1516 with a 15 W TDP, so it is aimed at laptops and compact systems rather than full desktop builds.

The Intel Processor 300T is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with a 35 W TDP. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm node and has a die size of 163 mm². It offers dual-channel memory support and compatibility with DDR4 and DDR5, which gives it flexibility for different platform configurations. Its 2 cores and 4 threads limit its multi-threaded potential compared to the 6-core Core 7 360, and the lack of any recorded benchmark scores means its actual performance cannot be verified from this dataset.

The choice between these two is largely a platform decision. The Core 7 360 is the only one with benchmark evidence of strong performance, particularly in multi-core workloads where its 6 cores provide a clear structural advantage. The Processor 300T is the only one of the two that supports DDR4 memory and dual-channel operation, and it uses a desktop socket with Gen 5 PCIe and 16 CPU lanes, versus Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes for the Core 7 360. Users building a desktop system with existing DDR4 memory would find the Processor 300T more compatible. Users seeking measured multi-core performance would select the Core 7 360.

The launch MSRP for the Core 7 360 is $426. The launch MSRP for the Processor 300T is $82.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374. The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the Core 7 360 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 7 360 is within 0.4 percent of all four nearest rivals. Against the Intel Core i3-13100 the delta is 0, against the Intel Core 5 330 it is 0.2 percent, against the Intel Core i3-14100 it is 0.3 percent, and against the Intel Core 3 305 it is 0.4 percent.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Intel Core 7 360 and the Intel Processor 300T have the multiplier locked, as the multiplierUnlocked field is false for both.

Q: What are the production status and release dates?

A: Both processors are listed as Active in production status. The Intel Core 7 360 has a release date of 2026-04-15, and the Intel Processor 300T has a release date of 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a generation label of Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) and is built on a 3 nm process node at Intel. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake-S codenames with a generation label of Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) and is built on a 10 nm process node. The die size for the Processor 300T is 163 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 7 360.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Core 7 360 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, with 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Processor 300T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, also with 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 7 360 therefore has more than double the per-core L1 and L2 cache of the Processor 300T.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. The Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. The Core 7 360 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes, while the Processor 300T uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Neither processor supports ECC memory. The Core 7 360 targets the mobile segment on Intel BGA 1516, while the Processor 300T targets the desktop segment on Intel Socket 1700. The Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock; the Core 7 360 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock of the Core 7 360 is 1.50 GHz, and its boost clock is 4.80 GHz. The Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

The Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 W, while the Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W. The sockets differ: Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 7 360, and Intel Socket 1700 for the Processor 300T. The Core 7 360 uses a 3 nm process node, while the Processor 300T uses a 10 nm node. The die size is 163 mm² for the Processor 300T, with no die size recorded for the Core 7 360.

The Core 7 360 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core. The Processor 300T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. Both have 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded bandwidth.

The Core 7 360 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes, while the Processor 300T uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) for the Core 7 360 and UHD Graphics 710 for the Processor 300T. The Core 7 360 is a mobile processor, while the Processor 300T is a desktop processor. The Core 7 360 has a launch MSRP of $426, and the Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82. The part numbers are SAE3E for the Core 7 360 and SRN3K for the Processor 300T. Both have locked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory.