Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus Comparison

The Intel Core 7 360 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus occupy different tiers in the mobile processor landscape, and the benchmark data confirms a decisive performance gap between them. The Core 7 360 is a 6-core, 6-thread part, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a 20-core, 20-thread processor. Across every recorded benchmark, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus delivers a commanding lead, with the Core 7 360 failing to secure a single win in the head-to-head comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows a consistent and substantial advantage for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus across all 17 recorded tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 41,913 against the Core 7 360's 13,634, a 67.5% lead. The single-core Cinebench R23 results are similarly lopsided, with the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus posting 5,917 versus 1,924, again a 67.5% advantage. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R15 and R20, where the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus leads by approximately 67.5% in both single and multi-threaded tests.

The PassMark suite reveals the widest margins. In the data compression test, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 493,179, which is 71% higher than the Core 7 360's 142,877. The floating point math test shows a similar gap, with the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 163,567 versus 44,963, a 72.5% advantage. Integer math follows, with the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 122,449 against 34,238, a 72% lead. The find prime numbers test shows the largest delta at 75.1%, with the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scoring 482 versus 120.

The only test where the gap narrows significantly is PassMark single-thread. Here, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 4,764 versus the Core 7 360's 4,274, a 10.3% lead. While still a clear victory, this indicates the Core 7 360's architecture is relatively competitive on lightly threaded workloads, even though it falls far behind in multi-threaded scenarios. The multi-thread PassMark score for the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is 48,270, versus 15,544 for the Core 7 360, a 67.8% difference.

In the broader database, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,834. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900KF (delta 0%) and the Intel Core i9-13900K (delta 0.1%). The Core 7 360, in contrast, is in the 72nd percentile with an average score of 18,374, placing it near the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core 5 330. The delta between the two parts in average score is substantial: 61,834 versus 18,374, a difference of 43,460 points.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divergence explains the benchmark results. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses 20 cores and 20 threads, while the Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. This 14-core difference directly drives the multi-threaded performance gap. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is based on the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh codename, part of the Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-HX) generation, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. The Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation, and is also on a 3 nm process, but fabricated by Intel.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Core 7 360 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also has a defined transistor count of 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 7 360 has no listed transistor or die size data.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. Memory support also varies: the Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

The sockets are different, with the Core 7 360 on Intel BGA 1516 and the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus on Intel BGA 2114. PCIe connectivity also differs, with the Core 7 360 offering Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only) versus the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus's Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 7 360 does not.

Clock speeds further separate the two. The Core 7 360 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also has a higher TDP of 55 watts versus 15 watts for the Core 7 360.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus outperforms the Intel Core 7 360 in every single recorded test, with margins ranging from 10.3% in single-thread to 75.1% in prime number finding. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the correct choice for any workload that benefits from multi-threading, including rendering, data compression, and heavy calculation tasks. Its 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache provide a massive advantage over the Core 7 360's 6 cores and 6 MB of L3 cache.

The Core 7 360, with its 15-watt TDP and 6-core design, is positioned for efficiency and lighter tasks. Its single-thread performance is within 10.3% of the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, which is notable given the latter's much higher power envelope. However, the data shows no scenario where the Core 7 360 wins. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also holds a higher database percentile at 93 versus 72, and its average benchmark score of 61,834 places it in the same class as the Intel Core i9-13900KF, while the Core 7 360's 18,374 aligns with the Intel Core i3-13100.

For users prioritizing maximum compute performance in a mobile platform, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is the superior processor based on all available measurements. The Core 7 360 may appeal to those seeking lower power consumption, but its performance is firmly in the lower tier.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: 6 (Core 7 360) vs 20 (Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus)
• Threads: 6 vs 20
• Base Clock: 1.50 GHz vs 2.40 GHz
• Boost Clock: 4.80 GHz vs 5.30 GHz
• TDP: 15 W vs 55 W
• Socket: Intel BGA 1516 vs Intel BGA 2114
• Codename: Wildcat Lake vs Arrow Lake-HX Refresh
• Generation: Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) vs Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-HX)
• Foundry: Intel vs TSMC
• Transistors: Not listed vs 17,800 million
• Die Size: Not listed vs 243 mm²
• L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (per core) vs 3 MB (per core)
• L3 Cache: 6 MB (shared) vs 30 MB (shared)
• Memory Support: DDR5, LPDDR5X vs DDR5
• Memory Bus: Single-channel vs Dual-channel
• Memory Bandwidth: 59.7 GB/s vs 102.4 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) vs Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) vs Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
• Release Date: 2026-04-15 vs 2026-03-16
• Launch MSRP: $426 vs Not listed
• Multiplier Unlocked: No vs Yes
• Part Number: SAE3E vs SADST

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 41,913, while the Intel Core 7 360 scores 13,634, a 67.5% difference.

Q: How close are the two processors in single-threaded performance?

A: In PassMark single-thread, the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus leads with 4,764 versus 4,274 for the Core 7 360, a 10.3% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in core count?

A: The Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 20 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Core 7 360.

Q: What are the TDP values for each processor?

A: The Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts, and the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has a TDP of 55 watts.

Q: Which processor has an unlocked multiplier?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 7 360 does not.