Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Comparison

Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

The Intel Core 7 360 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F are two very different processors from Intel, aimed at different market segments. The Core 7 360 is a mobile part on the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop processor on the Intel Socket 1851. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the Core 7 360 does claim one significant single-core victory. This analysis breaks down the recorded results, specifications, and architectural differences to clarify which processor suits which workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The performance gap between these two processors is substantial and consistent across nearly every test. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F wins 16 of the 17 recorded benchmark comparisons, with the Intel Core 7 360 taking a single, narrow victory.

Starting with multi-core performance, the Core Ultra 5 225F dominates. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 2660 against the Core 7 360's 1374, a difference of 48.3%. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: 11059 for the Core Ultra 5 225F versus 5726 for the Core 7 360, again a 48.2% gap. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result narrows the margin slightly, with the Core Ultra 5 225F scoring 16467 and the Core 7 360 scoring 13634, a 17.2% difference. This is still a decisive win for the desktop part, but the smaller margin suggests the Core 7 360 handles the longer, more sustained workload relatively better than the shorter R15 and R20 bursts.

The PassMark suite reinforces this multi-core advantage. In PassMark multi-thread, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 31004, while the Core 7 360 scores 15544, a 49.9% difference. The integer math test shows the Core Ultra 5 225F at 66417 versus 34238, a 48.4% lead. Floating point math is similarly one-sided: 92554 for the Core Ultra 5 225F against 44963 for the Core 7 360, a 51.4% gap. Data compression shows the Core Ultra 5 225F at 310843 versus 142877, a 54% advantage. Data encryption results are 22648 versus 11164, a 50.7% lead. Extended instructions see the Core Ultra 5 225F at 28027 and the Core 7 360 at 12390, a 55.8% margin. Even the physics test, which can be sensitive to architectural differences, favors the Core Ultra 5 225F with 2430 against 1213, a 50.1% gap. Random string sorting shows 37325 versus 17636, a 52.8% lead. The largest margin is in the find prime numbers test, where the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 352 and the Core 7 360 scores 120, a 65.9% difference.

Single-core performance tells a slightly different story. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 7 360 actually wins, scoring 1924 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 1893. This is a modest 1.6% victory, but it is a real one. The Cinebench R15 single-core test, however, goes the other way: the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 287 versus 193, a 32.8% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core also favors the Core Ultra 5 225F, with 1561 against 808, a 48.2% margin. PassMark single-thread results show a much closer contest, with the Core Ultra 5 225F at 4397 and the Core 7 360 at 4274, a 2.8% difference. So, while the Core 7 360 has the edge in one specific rendering test, the Core Ultra 5 225F is generally faster in single-threaded tasks, though the margin in PassMark is small.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear conclusion. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is the faster processor in almost every measurable way. Its average benchmark score is 37313, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it in the 72nd percentile. The Core Ultra 5 225F sits in the company of processors like the Intel Core i9-13900HK, which scores 37425, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, which scores 37161. The Core 7 360, by contrast, is closest to the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 and the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318.

For a desktop user who needs multi-core throughput, the Core Ultra 5 225F is the obvious choice. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with a 20 MB shared L3 cache, deliver roughly double the multi-threaded performance of the Core 7 360 in most tests. The only area where the Core 7 360 shows an advantage is the single Cinebench R23 single-core result, and that margin is tiny.

The Core 7 360 is a mobile processor, and its lower power envelope and integrated graphics make it suitable for a different use case entirely. It is not a desktop replacement part. The data shows that anyone building a desktop PC should look at the Core Ultra 5 225F, while the Core 7 360 belongs in a laptop.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F wins in all multi-threaded and most single-threaded workloads. This includes rendering, video encoding, data compression, encryption, physics simulations, and any task that can use multiple cores. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, paired with a larger L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth, give it a commanding lead in these areas. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31004 is nearly double the Core 7 360's 15544, confirming that heavily parallel workloads will run much faster on the desktop part.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins in exactly one benchmark: Cinebench R23 single-core. This test reflects a specific rendering workload that favors the Core 7 360's architecture. The 1.6% difference is small, but it indicates that for short, single-threaded rendering tasks, the Core 7 360 can be marginally ahead. This is not a general-purpose single-thread victory, as the PassMark single-thread test and both other Cinebench single-core tests go to the Core Ultra 5 225F. Still, the data shows that the Core 7 360 has a particular strength in this one area.

For a user who values low power consumption and integrated graphics, the Core 7 360 has clear advantages. Its TDP is 15 watts, and it includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a TDP of 65 watts and no integrated graphics, which means it requires a discrete GPU. The Core 7 360 also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is typical for mobile platforms.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has an average benchmark score of 37313, while the Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 360 ever outperform the Core Ultra 5 225F?

A: Yes, in the Cinebench R23 single-core test, the Core 7 360 scores 1924 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 1893, a 1.6% advantage.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 352 and the Core 7 360 scores 120, a 65.9% difference.

Q: How do their core counts differ?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: Which processor supports more memory channels?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F supports dual-channel memory, while the Intel Core 7 360 supports single-channel memory.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core 7 360 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process node at Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and is also on a 3 nm node, but it is manufactured by TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 225F has 17,800 million transistors and a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 7 360 has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Cache structures differ as well. Both processors have 192 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 2.5 MB per core on the Core 7 360, and 3 MB per core on the Core Ultra 5 225F. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the Core 7 360 has 6 MB shared, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has 20 MB shared.

Memory support also diverges. The Core 7 360 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a single-channel memory bus and a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities are different. The Core 7 360 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 225F offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This gives the desktop part significantly more expansion bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are a clear differentiator. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads. Neither processor supports simultaneous multithreading.

Clock speeds differ notably. The Core 7 360 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The higher base clock on the desktop part contributes to its strong performance in short burst tests.

Thermal design power is vastly different. The Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has a TDP of 65 watts. This reflects the mobile versus desktop positioning.

The sockets are incompatible. The Core 7 360 uses Intel BGA 1516, which is a soldered mobile socket. The Core Ultra 5 225F uses Intel Socket 1851, a standard desktop socket.

Integrated graphics are present on the Core 7 360, with Intel Xe3 Graphics featuring 2 Xe cores. The Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics at all.

Release dates differ. The Core 7 360 was released on 2026-04-15, while the Core Ultra 5 225F was released on 2025-01-06. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a launch MSRP of $231, and the Core 7 360 has a launch MSRP of $426. Both processors remain active in production.

Memory bus width and bandwidth are also different. The Core 7 360 uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 225F uses a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core Ultra 5 225F also has more PCIe lanes, 20 Gen 5 lanes versus 6 Gen 4 lanes.

The part numbers are distinct: SAE3E for the Core 7 360, and SRQD2SRVF9 for the Core Ultra 5 225F. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.