Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core i9-14900HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database records 17 head-to-head comparisons between the Intel Core 7 360 and the Intel Core i9-14900HX. The Core i9-14900HX wins 15 of those tests, while the Core 7 360 wins 2. The magnitude of the Core i9's victories is substantial, particularly in multi-threaded workloads.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i9-14900HX scores 4574 against the Core 7 360's 1374, a delta of -70%. The Cinebench R20 multicore test shows a similar pattern: 15616 versus 5726, a -63.3% gap. The Cinebench R23 multicore result narrows the margin slightly: the Core i9 scores 30055, the Core 7 360 scores 13634, a -54.6% difference. These results reflect the Core i9's 24 cores and 32 threads compared to the Core 7 360's 6 cores and 6 threads.

The single-core Cinebench results favor the Core i9 as well, but by smaller margins. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Core i9 scores 310.5 versus 193 for the Core 7 360, a -37.8% delta. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 2204 versus 808, a -63.3% gap. Cinebench R23 single-core closes the distance: 2181.5 versus 1924, a -11.8% difference. The single-core advantage of the Core i9 persists, but the Core 7 360's Wildcat Lake architecture narrows the performance gap in the newer Cinebench version.

PassMark tests show the Core i9 dominating across nearly every category. The largest delta appears in passmark_integer_math: the Core i9 scores 157375, the Core 7 360 scores 34238, a -78.2% difference. PassMark data compression shows 539965 versus 142877, a -73.5% gap. Random string sorting follows with 60861 versus 17636, a -71% difference. Data encryption shows 32619 versus 11164, a -65.8% gap. Multithread performance shows 43778 versus 15544, a -64.5% difference. Extended instructions show 31247 versus 12390, a -60.3% gap. Floating point math shows 112273 versus 44963, a -60% difference. Physics shows 2638 versus 1213, a -54% gap. Find prime numbers shows 193 versus 120, a -37.8% difference.

The Core 7 360 wins only in the PassMark single-thread tests. Both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread record identical scores: 4274 for the Core 7 360 versus 4175 for the Core i9-14900HX, a 2.4% advantage for the Core 7 360. This is a narrow win, but it indicates that the Core 7 360's single-thread execution efficiency exceeds that of the Core i9 in this specific benchmark.

The average benchmark score for the Core i9-14900HX is 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile against all CPUs. The Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it in the 72nd percentile. The Core i9's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 253PQE at 55919 (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 at 56273 (-0.5%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 at 56306 (-0.5%), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX at 56555 (-1%). The Core 7 360's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0% delta), Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 (0.2%), Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.3%), and Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.4%).

Where Each One Wins

The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14900HX is the clear choice for multi-threaded and heavily parallel workloads. Its 24 cores and 32 threads provide a massive advantage in rendering, compression, encryption, and mathematical computations. The Cinebench multicore scores, which range from -54.6% to -70% relative deltas, show that the Core i9 delivers more than double the throughput in most multi-core scenarios. PassMark integer math, with a -78.2% delta, represents the largest performance gap, indicating that the Core i9 excels at integer-heavy tasks such as code compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and database operations.

The Core i9 also wins in single-core Cinebench tests, though the margins vary. The -11.8% delta in Cinebench R23 single-core is the closest multi-core-adjacent result, but the Core i9 still holds the advantage. For workloads that rely on a mix of single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread throughput, such as content creation pipelines that alternate between interactive editing and batch rendering, the Core i9's overall profile is stronger.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins specifically in PassMark single-thread tests, recording 4274 points versus 4175 for the Core i9, a 2.4% advantage. This suggests that the Core 7 360 has a slight edge in lightly threaded applications where a single core carries the entire load. Tasks such as basic office productivity, web browsing, and lightweight code editing may benefit marginally from this single-thread performance. However, the Core 7 360's wins are isolated to this one benchmark category, and the magnitude of its advantage is small.

For power-sensitive mobile configurations, the Core 7 360's 15 W TDP stands in contrast to the Core i9's 55 W TDP. The database does not record sustained power draw or thermal behavior, but the TDP figures suggest that the Core 7 360 is designed for thinner, fanless, or battery-optimized systems, while the Core i9 targets high-performance laptops with robust cooling solutions. The Core 7 360's 6 MB shared L3 cache and single-channel memory bus further indicate a lower-power design, whereas the Core i9's 36 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory bus support higher bandwidth workloads.

The Core i9-14900HX also supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 360 does not. This makes the Core i9 suitable for error-sensitive computing environments, such as data processing or scientific simulations where memory corruption is unacceptable. The Core 7 360's memory support is limited to DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Core i9 supports DDR4 and DDR5, providing broader compatibility with existing memory modules.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has an average benchmark score of 56004, while the Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374. The Core i9 ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 360 ranks in the 72nd percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 360 win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes. The Core 7 360 wins the PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, both recording 4274 points versus 4175 for the Core i9-14900HX, a 2.4% advantage.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest delta is in PassMark integer math, where the Core i9-14900HX scores 157375 versus 34238 for the Core 7 360, a -78.2% difference. Data compression follows at -73.5% and random string sorting at -71%.

Q: How do the Cinebench R23 scores compare?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core i9-14900HX scores 30055 versus 13634 for the Core 7 360, a -54.6% delta. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core i9 scores 2181.5 versus 1924, a -11.8% delta.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor?

A: The Core i9-14900HX's nearest rivals are the Intel Core 7 253PQE at 55919 (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 at 56273 (-0.5%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 at 56306 (-0.5%), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX at 56555 (-1%). The Core 7 360's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0% delta), Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 (0.2%), Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.3%), and Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.4%).

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 360 does not. The Core i9 also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core 7 360 and Intel Core i9-14900HX differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database. The Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Core i9 has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks differ: the Core 7 360 runs at 1.50 GHz, the Core i9 at 2.20 GHz. Boost clocks also differ: 4.80 GHz for the Core 7 360 versus 5.80 GHz for the Core i9. TDP is 15 W for the Core 7 360 and 55 W for the Core i9.

The socket types differ: the Core 7 360 uses Intel BGA 1516, while the Core i9 uses Intel BGA 1964. The process node differs: 3 nm for the Core 7 360 versus 10 nm for the Core i9. Die size is recorded only for the Core i9 at 257 mm². Cache configurations differ: the Core 7 360 has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. The Core i9 has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: the Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Core i9 supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, and no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory support is present on the Core i9 but absent on the Core 7 360. PCIe lanes differ: the Core 7 360 has Gen 4 with 6 CPU-only lanes, while the Core i9 has Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core i9 uses UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is unlocked on the Core i9 but locked on the Core 7 360. Part numbers are SAE3E for the Core 7 360 and SRMXF for the Core i9. The release dates differ: 2026-04-15 for the Core 7 360 and 2024-01-07 for the Core i9. The launch MSRP for the Core 7 360 is $426; no launch MSRP is recorded for the Core i9.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different architectures and codenames. The Intel Core 7 360 is based on Wildcat Lake, with a generation listed as Core 5 (Wildcat Lake). The Intel Core i9-14900HX is based on Raptor Lake, with a generation listed as Core i9 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh). The Core 7 360 is fabricated on a 3 nm process by Intel, while the Core i9 uses a 10 nm process, also by Intel.

The core counts reflect the architectural divergence: the Wildcat Lake design uses 6 cores without simultaneous multithreading, resulting in 6 threads. The Raptor Lake-HX design uses 24 cores with 32 threads, indicating a mix of performance and efficiency cores with hyper-threading on the performance cores. The cache hierarchy differs substantially: the Core 7 360 allocates 192 KB L1 per core and 2.5 MB L2 per core, while the Core i9 uses 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core. The shared L3 cache is 6 MB on the Core 7 360 versus 36 MB on the Core i9.

Memory architecture differences are notable. The Core 7 360 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core i9 uses a dual-channel bus with no recorded bandwidth figure. The Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, the Core i9 supports DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe capabilities differ: the Core 7 360 provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU-only lanes, the Core i9 provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.

The integrated graphics differ in design: the Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core i9 uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core i9 supports ECC memory, the Core 7 360 does not. The Core i9 has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Core 7 360's multiplier is locked. The production status is active for both, and both target the mobile market segment. The Core 7 360's TDP of 15 W is significantly lower than the Core i9's 55 W, aligning with the smaller core count and reduced cache footprint.