Intel Core 7 350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 Comparison

Intel Core 7 350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100

The Intel Core 7 350 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 are two mobile processors aimed at different segments of the laptop market. The Intel part, based on the Wildcat Lake architecture, offers a 6-core, 6-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100, built on the Oryon architecture, provides 10 cores and 10 threads with a base clock of 3.40 GHz. Benchmark data for the Intel processor shows an average score of 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. The Qualcomm processor has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning its average score is zero and its percentile ranking is 50th. This lack of measured performance data for the Snapdragon part makes direct numerical comparison impossible, so the analysis below relies entirely on the Intel benchmarks and the architectural specifications of both chips.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results comparing the Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. Consequently, any direct performance comparison must be framed through the Intel processor's absolute scores and the Qualcomm processor's specifications, which do not include any measured test results.

Focusing on the Intel Core 7 350's recorded benchmarks, the Cinebench suite provides a clear picture of its multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R15, the Intel processor scores 1220 points in the multicore test and 292 points in the singlecore test. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 5373, while the singlecore score reaches 758. The Cinebench R23 results continue this trend, with a multicore score of 8030 and a singlecore score of 2046. These numbers indicate that the Intel processor scales its performance effectively across different rendering workloads, with the multicore scores showing a roughly 4.4x increase from R15 to R23, reflecting the heavier workload requirements of the newer benchmark versions.

The Passmark suite offers additional insight into the Intel Core 7 350's specialized workloads. In data compression, the processor achieves a score of 143123, while data encryption reaches 10933. Extended instructions score 12045, and floating point math hits 42809. Integer math scores 33734, and the multithread test records 15170. Physics testing yields 1173 points, random string sorting produces 17238, and single thread performance is measured at 4100. The find prime numbers test is notably low at 107, which suggests that this particular workload is not a strength for the architecture.

Relative to its nearest rivals in the database, the Intel Core 7 350's average benchmark score of 17779 places it in close competition with several other processors. The Intel Core 5 221TE has an average score of 17860, resulting in a delta of -0.5 percent for the Core 7 350, meaning the Core 5 221TE is slightly ahead. The AMD EPYC 9374F averages 17693, giving the Intel part a 0.5 percent advantage. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, a -0.6 percent delta, and the Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, a -0.7 percent delta. These tight margins, all within 1 percent, indicate that the Core 7 350 sits in a crowded performance tier where negligible differences separate it from its direct competitors.

The absence of benchmarks for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 means that no score can be cited for it, nor can any delta be computed. The database records its percentile as 50, which typically indicates median performance, but without actual test data this percentile is not empirically supported by measurements. The Intel Core 7 350's 71st percentile, by contrast, is derived from its 17 recorded benchmark scores. Any claim about the Qualcomm part's performance would be speculative, so the analysis confines itself to the architectural differences that might influence future benchmark outcomes.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Qualcomm part offers 4 more cores and 4 more threads, which could benefit heavily parallel workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this advantage.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no listed boost clock. The Intel processor's boost clock is significantly higher, while the Qualcomm processor's base clock is more than double that of the Intel part.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has a TDP of 35 watts. The Qualcomm processor consumes more than twice the power budget of the Intel processor, which may affect cooling requirements and battery life in mobile devices.

Q: Which processor supports a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 supports only LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm processor offers more than double the memory bandwidth of the Intel processor.

Q: How do the cache hierarchies differ between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm processor has larger L1 and L2 caches, while the L3 caches are identical at 6 MB.

Q: What are the manufacturing process nodes for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel processor uses a smaller process node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779, derived from 17 tests. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average benchmark score is 0. The database shows no measurable performance data for the Qualcomm part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying architectures, process nodes, and feature sets. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The difference in process node, 3 nm versus 4 nm, gives the Intel part a potential density and efficiency edge, though the Qualcomm part's larger core count may compensate in multi-threaded scenarios.

The core configurations are distinct. Intel uses 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading or simultaneous multithreading. Qualcomm uses 10 cores and 10 threads, also without multithreading. The base clock of the Qualcomm processor is 3.40 GHz, which is substantially higher than the Intel part's 1.50 GHz base clock. However, the Intel processor's boost clock of 4.80 GHz exceeds the Qualcomm part's unspecified boost capability. The Qualcomm processor has no recorded boost clock in the database.

Cache layouts also differ. The Intel Core 7 350 allocates 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 allocates 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm part's L2 cache, at 12 MB per module, is considerably larger than Intel's 2.5 MB per core, which could improve performance for workloads with high cache locality. Both processors share the same 6 MB L3 cache size.

Memory support further separates the two. The Intel processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus, delivering 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The Qualcomm processor supports only LPDDR5X memory but uses a dual-channel bus, achieving 135.2 GB/s. This bandwidth advantage for Qualcomm is substantial, potentially benefiting memory-intensive applications like data analytics or large file transfers. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also varies. The Intel Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Qualcomm part offers double the PCIe lanes, which could allow for more expansion options or faster connectivity to discrete components. Both use the same PCIe generation.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel processor uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Qualcomm processor uses Adreno X1-85. The database lists no specific benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so their relative graphical performance cannot be quantified from the available data.

The socket types are incompatible: Intel BGA 1516 for the Intel part and Qualcomm BGA 2073 for the Qualcomm part. This means they are not interchangeable in any system. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $469, while the Qualcomm processor has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel part is unlocked in the sense that its multiplier is not unlocked, meaning it cannot be overclocked. The Qualcomm processor also has a locked multiplier.

Production status is active for both processors. The release dates differ, with the Intel Core 7 350 released on 2026-04-15 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 released on 2024-04-23. The Intel part is newer by almost two years. The market segment for both is mobile, indicating they are designed for laptops and portable devices.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear asymmetry: the Intel Core 7 350 has 17 benchmark scores and an average score of 17779, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has zero recorded benchmarks. For users who rely on measured performance, the Intel processor is the only one with empirical evidence of its capabilities. Its 71st percentile ranking, compared to the Qualcomm part's 50th percentile, suggests that the Intel processor sits higher in the overall distribution of CPU performance, though the Qualcomm percentile is not backed by any benchmark data.

The Intel Core 7 350's nearest rivals, all within a 0.7 percent delta in average score, include the Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and Intel Core 5 120U. This clustering indicates that the Intel processor delivers performance consistent with established mid-range desktop and mobile chips. The specific scores, such as 8030 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2046 in Cinebench R23 singlecore, provide concrete reference points for expected rendering performance.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 offers architectural advantages that could translate to superior performance in certain workloads. Its 10 cores, higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, larger L2 cache of 12 MB per module, and dual-channel memory with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth are all specifications that favor multi-threaded and memory-intensive tasks. However, without any benchmark scores, these specifications remain theoretical. The absence of data prevents any quantitative claim about its real-world performance.

For a user choosing between these two processors, the decision hinges on data availability. The Intel processor has verified scores across multiple test suites, allowing for confidence in its rendering, encryption, and math performance. The Qualcomm processor has no such verification, so its actual performance is unknown. The Intel part also carries a lower TDP of 15 watts versus 35 watts, which suggests better power efficiency for mobile use. The Qualcomm part's higher memory bandwidth and PCIe lane count are notable, but they do not compensate for the lack of measured benchmark results.

The Intel Core 7 350 is the only processor with a recorded average benchmark score, making it the sole candidate for data-driven performance assessment. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 remains an unmeasured entity in the database, and any selection based on its specifications alone would lack empirical support.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Core 7 350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Manufacturer | Intel | Unknown |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 6 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | None listed |

| TDP | 15 watts | 35 watts |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Oryon |

| Generation | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) | Snapdragon X (Plus) |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 12 MB (per module) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) | Adreno X1-85 |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2024-04-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $469 | None listed |

| Part Number | SAE3F | X1P64100 |

| Benchmarks | 17 recorded scores | No recorded scores |

| Average Benchmark Score | 17779 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 71 | 50 |

| Nearest Rivals | Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, Intel Core 5 120U | None listed |

Both processors share the same L3 cache size of 6 MB shared, have ECC memory disabled, and have a locked multiplier. Neither has a recorded transistor count or die size. The market segment for both is mobile, and production status is active for both.