Intel Core 7 350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 7 350

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Unknown
CPU

Snapdragon X1E-84-100

CORE STATE Oryon
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Oryon
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,220
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
292
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,373
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
758
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
8,030
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,046
N/A
passmark_data_compression
143,123
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
10,933
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
12,045
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
107
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
42,809
N/A
passmark_integer_math
33,734
N/A
passmark_multithread
15,170
N/A
passmark_physics
1,173
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
17,238
N/A
passmark_single_thread
4,100
N/A
passmark_singlethread
4,100
N/A

Analysis: Intel Core 7 350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between these two processors. The Intel Core 7 350 has a complete set of benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This absence of data for the Snapdragon means there are no direct head-to-head comparisons to calculate. The Intel part's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are the Intel Core 5 221TE at 17860 (0.5% behind the Core 7 350's 17779 average), the AMD EPYC 9374F at 17693 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 17891 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core 5 120U at 17898 (0.7% behind). These deltas are all under one percent, placing the Core 7 350 in a tight cluster of similar average performers.

The Intel Core 7 350's Cinebench results provide a clear picture of its capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 8030 in multicore and 2046 in single-core. The R20 run shows 5373 multicore and 758 single-core, while R15 delivers 1220 multicore and 292 single-core. The Passmark suite adds further detail: multithread score of 15170, single-thread score of 4100, integer math at 33734, floating point math at 42809, data compression at 143123, data encryption at 10933, extended instructions at 12045, find prime numbers at 107, random string sorting at 17238, and physics at 1173. With an average benchmark score of 17779, the Core 7 350 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile placement with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of recorded measurements.

Because the Snapdragon has no benchmark data, any comparative analysis must rely on architectural specifications rather than measured performance. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries and no win counts for either processor. The Core 7 350's percentile ranking indicates it outperforms roughly seven out of ten CPUs in the database, while the Snapdragon's 50th percentile with no scores suggests its ranking is provisional pending actual test results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their fundamental design. The Intel Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry, using the Wildcat Lake codename and belonging to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. Its base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and it carries a 15 W TDP. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses TSMC's 4 nm process, employs the Oryon codename, and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Elite) generation. It offers 12 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 3.80 GHz, a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, and a 35 W TDP. The Intel part's boost clock is 0.60 GHz higher than the Snapdragon's, while the Snapdragon's base clock is 2.30 GHz higher than the Intel's.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Intel Core 7 350 provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. Both share the same L3 capacity, but the Snapdragon's L2 is substantially larger per module. Memory support varies: the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and 135.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth is more than double the Intel part's.

Connectivity and graphics also differ. The Intel Core 7 350 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes and integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes and integrates Adreno X1-85 graphics. The Intel processor fits the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the Snapdragon uses the Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. Neither supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers. Release dates are far apart: the Intel part launched on 2026-04-15, while the Snapdragon launched on 2024-04-23, roughly two years earlier.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the Intel Core 7 350 is the only one of the two with verified benchmark results. Its 71st percentile ranking, average benchmark score of 17779, and complete Cinebench and Passmark suite give it a measurable performance profile. The Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile that appears to be a placeholder rather than a tested result. From the recorded data alone, the Intel part is the viable choice for workloads that depend on measured single-thread and multithread performance.

The Snapdragon does have structural advantages that could translate to performance in specific scenarios, but those are not confirmed by any benchmark numbers in the database. Its 12 cores versus 6, higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, larger L2 cache of 12 MB per module versus 2.5 MB per core, dual-channel memory with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth versus single-channel 59.7 GB/s, and double the PCIe lanes (12 versus 6) all suggest it was designed for different priorities. However, without scores, these specifications remain theoretical.

The Intel Core 7 350's launch MSRP is $469. The Snapdragon has no launch MSRP recorded. For users choosing strictly from the database, the Intel part is the only one with evidence of performance. The Snapdragon's 50th percentile with no average score does not indicate failure; it indicates a lack of data. The verdict from the recorded information is straightforward: the Intel Core 7 350 delivers measurable results, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 does not yet have any in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, as no benchmark entries are recorded for it.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel memory bus. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 provides 135.2 GB/s over a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 boosts to 4.20 GHz. The Intel part is 0.60 GHz higher in boost clock.

Q: What are the process nodes for each?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. Both the Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 have ECC memory support set to false in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins decisively in the measured performance category. It has recorded scores in every benchmark test in the database: Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 for both multicore and single-core, plus the full Passmark suite covering multithread, single-thread, integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, random string sorting, and physics. Its 71st percentile against all CPUs and its average score of 17779 place it in a competitive band with the Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and Intel Core 5 120U, all within 0.7% of its average score.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-84-100 wins on paper in several architectural categories. It has double the cores (12 versus 6), a much higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 1.50 GHz), a larger L2 cache (12 MB per module versus 2.5 MB per core), more than double the memory bandwidth (135.2 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s), dual-channel memory versus single-channel, and double the PCIe Gen 4 lanes (12 versus 6). It also has a larger L1 cache per core at 288 KB versus 192 KB. These specifications point toward advantages in memory-heavy and parallel workloads, but the database contains no benchmark results to confirm them.

The Intel part wins in boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.20 GHz), process node (3 nm versus 4 nm), and in having a verified release date of 2026-04-15 with a launch MSRP of $469. The Snapdragon's release date is 2024-04-23, and it has no launch MSRP recorded. For any user relying on the database's measured results, the Intel Core 7 350 is the only processor with evidence of actual performance. The Snapdragon's architectural specifications suggest it could excel in bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but that remains unverified in the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category except for a few shared traits. Both have ECC memory support set to false, both have locked multipliers, and both use PCIe Gen 4, though the Intel part has 6 CPU lanes while the Snapdragon has 12. Both have 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Both target the mobile market segment and are marked as active in production.

Core and thread counts differ: the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Snapdragon X1E-84-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. Clock speeds differ: the Intel part runs at 1.50 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost, while the Snapdragon runs at 3.80 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost. TDP differs: 15 W for Intel versus 35 W for Qualcomm. Process nodes differ: 3 nm at Intel's foundry versus 4 nm at TSMC. Cache sizes differ: L1 is 192 KB per core on Intel versus 288 KB per core on Qualcomm, and L2 is 2.5 MB per core on Intel versus 12 MB per module on Qualcomm. Memory support differs: Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s, while Qualcomm supports only LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 135.2 GB/s. Integrated graphics differ: Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores versus Adreno X1-85. Sockets differ: Intel BGA 1516 versus Qualcomm BGA 2073. Codenames differ: Wildcat Lake versus Oryon. Generations differ: Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) versus Snapdragon X (Elite). Release dates differ by roughly two years: 2026-04-15 for Intel versus 2024-04-23 for Qualcomm. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469; the Snapdragon has none recorded. The manufacturer for Intel is listed as Intel, while Qualcomm's manufacturer is listed as Unknown in the database.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 350
Snapdragon X1E-84-100
Core Specs
Cores
6
12 +100.0%
Threads
6
12 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.5
3.8 +153.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.2 -12.5%
Frequency (GHz)
1.5
3.8 +153.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
4.2 -12.5%
Multiplier
15
38 +153.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
288 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
12 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
6 MB (shared)
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
35 +133.3%
PL2
—
80 W
Architecture
Codename
Wildcat Lake
Oryon
Generation
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Snapdragon X (Elite)
Process Size
3 nm
4 nm
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Single-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
59.7 GB/s
135.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR5 Speed
6400 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 1516
Qualcomm BGA 2073
PCIe
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 17 TOPS
Yes / 45 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
Adreno X1-85
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$469
—
Part Number
SAE3F
X1E84100
Package
FC-BGA
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
—
View Core 7 350 Details View Snapdragon X1E-84-100 Details