Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Intel Processor 300. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of direct measurements means the comparison must rely on the available specifications and the Core 7 350's standalone benchmark results.

The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. Its Cinebench R20 results are 5373 for multicore and 758 for single-core, while the older R15 test shows 1220 for multicore and 292 for single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 15170, a single-thread score of 4100, integer math at 33734, floating point math at 42809, and extended instructions at 12045. Data compression scores 143123, data encryption scores 10933, and random string sorting scores 17238. The processor also records 1173 in physics and 107 in find prime numbers.

The Core 7 350 achieves an average benchmark score of 17779, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show how tightly clustered this performance level is. The AMD EPYC 9374F sits 0.5% ahead with an average score of 17693, while the Intel Core 5 221TE trails by 0.5% at 17860. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT posts 17891, which is 0.6% behind the Core 7 350, and the Intel Core 5 120U records 17898, 0.7% behind. These deltas are small, indicating the Core 7 350 operates in a competitive performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate it from its nearest measured rivals.

Since the Intel Processor 300 lacks recorded scores, no exact numerical comparison between the two processors is possible. The Core 7 350's benchmark results stand on their own, showing a processor that is competitive with desktop parts from other families despite its mobile positioning. The lack of data for the Processor 300 means its relative performance cannot be quantified from the database, only inferred from its architectural and specification profile.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the clock speed situation for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no boost clock listed in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus, and no memory bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: What process nodes are used by these processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Intel Processor 300 uses a 10 nm process node, also fabricated by Intel.

Q: What is the production status and release timing?

A: Both processors are listed as Active in production status. The Intel Core 7 350 was released on 2026-04-15, while the Intel Processor 300 was released on 2024-01-07.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying architecture. The Intel Core 7 350 is built on the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. It uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The Intel Processor 300, by contrast, is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, and uses a 10 nm process node. The die size for the Processor 300 is recorded at 163 mm², while no die size is listed for the Core 7 350.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure and size. The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Processor 300 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Both share the same total L3 capacity of 6 MB, but the per-core L1 and L2 allocations are substantially larger on the Core 7 350.

The memory controllers reflect different platform priorities. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a recorded bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, though no bandwidth figure is recorded. PCIe capabilities also differ: the Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Processor 300 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). ECC memory is not supported by either processor. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the Core 7 350 using Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe cores) and the Processor 300 using UHD Graphics 710.

The market segments and sockets point to different intended platforms. The Core 7 350 is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the Processor 300 is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts. Both processors have locked multipliers. The Core 7 350 has a part number of SAE3F, and the Processor 300 has a part number of SRN3J.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: 6 cores for the Core 7 350 versus 2 cores for the Processor 300. Thread counts are 6 versus 4, respectively. Base clocks differ at 1.50 GHz for the Core 7 350 and 3.90 GHz for the Processor 300. The Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while no boost clock is recorded for the Processor 300. TDP ratings are 15 watts for the Core 7 350 and 46 watts for the Processor 300.

Sockets differ: Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 7 350, Intel Socket 1700 for the Processor 300. Process nodes differ at 3 nm versus 10 nm. L1 cache per core is 192 KB versus 80 KB, and L2 cache per core is 2.5 MB versus 1.25 MB. L3 cache is identical at 6 MB shared for both. Memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for the Core 7 350 versus DDR4 and DDR5 for the Processor 300. The memory bus is single-channel for the Core 7 350 and dual-channel for the Processor 300. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core 7 350 at 59.7 GB/s. PCIe differs: Gen 4 with 6 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) versus UHD Graphics 710. The market segment differs: Mobile versus Desktop. Release dates differ: 2026-04-15 versus 2024-01-07. The die size is recorded only for the Processor 300 at 163 mm². The launch MSRP for the Core 7 350 is $469, and for the Processor 300 it is $82.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins on raw computational throughput based on its recorded benchmarks. The multicore Cinebench scores of 1220 (R15), 5373 (R20), and 8030 (R23) indicate strong parallel processing capability, supported by the PassMark multithread score of 15170. The 6-core, 6-thread configuration with 2.5 MB L2 per core provides a wider execution footprint than the Processor 300's 2-core, 4-thread setup. The 4.80 GHz boost clock gives the Core 7 350 a high ceiling for single-threaded bursts, reflected in its single-thread PassMark score of 4100 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046. The 3 nm process node contributes to a low 15-watt TDP, which suits thermally constrained mobile environments.

The Intel Processor 300 wins on platform flexibility and connectivity. Its dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing use with older or newer memory ecosystems. The Gen 5 PCIe implementation with 16 lanes provides substantially more expansion bandwidth for desktop peripherals and storage devices. The higher base clock of 3.90 GHz means the Processor 300 maintains a strong baseline frequency without relying on boost states. Its desktop socket and 46-watt TDP align with conventional desktop power delivery and cooling arrangements. The 10 nm node and 163 mm² die size indicate a more mature, cost-focused manufacturing approach.

The Core 7 350 also leads in cache capacity per core, with 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core versus 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core on the Processor 300. This larger per-core cache can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. The Xe3 integrated graphics with 2 Xe cores represent a more modern graphics architecture than the UHD Graphics 710. The Core 7 350's LPDDR5X support enables low-power memory configurations typical of mobile designs.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split in intended usage. The Intel Core 7 350, with its 6 cores, 6 threads, 4.80 GHz boost clock, and 3 nm process node, is positioned for mobile computing where power efficiency and multi-threaded performance matter. Its 15-watt TDP and BGA socket confirm this. The benchmark results, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030 and a PassMark multithread score of 15170, place it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 9374F at 0.5% ahead and the Intel Core 5 221TE at 0.5% behind, indicate that the Core 7 350 competes closely with both server-class and mid-range desktop processors in average benchmark score.

The Intel Processor 300, with 2 cores, 4 threads, a 3.90 GHz base clock, and a 46-watt TDP, is a desktop entry-level part. Its dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, along with Gen 5 PCIe and 16 lanes, provides a solid foundation for basic desktop systems. The lack of recorded benchmarks in the database means its performance cannot be directly compared to the Core 7 350 using measured scores. However, the specification profile indicates a processor designed for straightforward desktop tasks rather than heavy multi-threaded workloads.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results and no wins recorded for either processor in direct comparison. The choice between them depends on platform requirements. For a mobile system with modern process technology, high boost capability, and integrated graphics with 2 Xe cores, the Intel Core 7 350 is the appropriate selection. For a desktop build needing dual-channel memory and Gen 5 PCIe expansion, the Intel Processor 300 offers the relevant connectivity. The Core 7 350's higher core count and larger per-core caches give it the computational advantage, while the Processor 300's dual-channel memory bus and greater PCIe lane count give it the platform advantage. Both processors are active in production, so availability is not a differentiator in the database. The release dates show the Core 7 350 is newer, with a 2026-04-15 launch, while the Processor 300 launched on 2024-01-07.