Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

The Intel Core 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T occupy different tiers in Intel’s current lineup, and the benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. The Core 7 350 is a 6-core, 6-thread mobile processor built on the Wildcat Lake architecture, while the Core Ultra 5 225T is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop chip using the Arrow Lake-S design. The recorded measurements show a decisive advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T across every single benchmark in the database, with no wins recorded for the Core 7 350.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity appears in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 21,971 against the Core 7 350’s 8,030, a delta of 63.5% in favor of the desktop part. The gap widens further in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the Core Ultra 5 225T posts 9,227 versus 5,373, a 41.8% advantage. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows the same pattern: 2,214 for the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 1,220 for the Core 7 350, a 44.9% difference.

Single-core performance also favors the Core Ultra 5 225T, though by a narrower margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 3,101 against 2,046, a 34% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1,302 versus 758, a 41.8% delta, while Cinebench R15 single-core is closer: 312 versus 292, a 6.4% gap. PassMark single-thread results echo this: 4,348 for the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 4,100 for the Core 7 350, a 5.7% difference.

The PassMark suite reinforces the multi-core dominance. Floating point math scores 82,751 for the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 42,809 for the Core 7 350, a 48.3% delta. Integer math follows at 59,543 versus 33,734, a 43.3% gap. Data compression shows 233,998 versus 143,123, a 38.8% difference, and data encryption posts 18,289 versus 10,933, a 40.2% margin. Extended instructions score 20,083 versus 12,045, a 40% delta. Find prime numbers is particularly lopsided: 284 versus 107, a 62.3% gap. Physics simulation scores 2,053 versus 1,173, a 42.9% difference. Random string sorting shows 28,774 versus 17,238, a 40.1% margin. The PassMark multi-thread score is 25,358 for the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 15,170 for the Core 7 350, a 40.2% lead.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 225T wins every benchmark category in the database, so the use-case split is straightforward. For heavily multi-threaded tasks such as 3D rendering, video encoding, scientific simulation, or any workload that scales with core count and thread count, the Core Ultra 5 225T delivers substantially higher throughput. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, combined with 20 MB of shared L3 cache, provide a structural advantage over the Core 7 350’s 6 cores and 6 threads with only 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,971 places it far ahead, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 25,358 confirms this pattern across a broader set of operations.

The Core 7 350’s best showing is in single-threaded workloads, where the delta narrows to 5.7% in PassMark single-thread and 6.4% in Cinebench R15 single-core. This indicates that for lightly threaded applications, such as basic office productivity, web browsing, or legacy software that relies on a single core, the Core 7 350 is much closer to the Core Ultra 5 225T in performance. However, it still loses every single-thread test, so there is no benchmark category where it emerges ahead.

The Core 7 350 does have a notable consumption profile. Its TDP is 15 watts, compared to 65 watts for the Core Ultra 5 225T, and its base clock is 1.50 GHz versus 2.50 GHz. The boost clock is nearly identical: 4.80 GHz for the Core 7 350 versus 4.90 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 225T. The lower TDP and mobile market segment suggest the Core 7 350 is intended for power-constrained environments, where the Core Ultra 5 225T’s higher throughput is not feasible. The Core 7 350 also uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s, which contributes to the latter’s advantage in memory-sensitive workloads.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T outperforms the Intel Core 7 350 in all 17 recorded benchmark comparisons. The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 5 225T is 30,468, which places it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Core 7 350 averages 17,779, putting it at the 71st percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 225T include the Intel Core i9-11980HK, which scores 30,422 with a 0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, which scores 30,390 with a 0.3% delta. For the Core 7 350, the nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 221TE at 17,860 with a 0.5% delta and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 17,891 with a 0.6% delta.

For users who need maximum compute throughput in desktop applications, the Core Ultra 5 225T is the clear choice. Its multi-core lead is massive, ranging from 41.8% to 63.5% across Cinebench versions, and its PassMark scores are consistently 38.8% to 62.3% higher. The Core 7 350, by contrast, is suited to mobile or low-power scenarios where the 15-watt TDP is a constraint and where the single-thread deficit of 5.7% to 6.4% is acceptable. The Core 7 350’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz is nearly identical to the Core Ultra 5 225T’s 4.90 GHz, so the single-thread gap is modest, but the multi-thread gap is decisive.

The production status for both processors is active. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, while the Core Ultra 5 225T has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The Core 7 350 uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket and is a mobile part, while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Intel Socket 1851 and is a desktop part. These platform differences mean the choice is not just about raw performance but also about the intended system form factor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins all multi-core benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21,971 versus 8,030 for the Core 7 350, a 63.5% lead. In PassMark multi-thread, it scores 25,358 versus 15,170, a 40.2% advantage.

Q: Is the single-core performance similar between the two?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T leads in every single-core test, but the margin is smaller. PassMark single-thread shows 4,348 versus 4,100, a 5.7% delta, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 312 versus 292, a 6.4% gap.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each?

A: The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The Core 7 350 has 2.5 MB per core of L2 cache and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 225T has 3 MB per core of L2 cache and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor uses more power?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225T has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Core 7 350 is a mobile processor, while the Core Ultra 5 225T is a desktop processor.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth differences?

A: The Core 7 350 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Core Ultra 5 225T uses a dual-channel memory bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and supports DDR5 only.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in architecture. The Core 7 350 is based on the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S codename, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, and is also built on a 3 nm process but by TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 225T has a larger transistor count at 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm², while the Core 7 350 has no recorded transistor or die size data.

The core counts differ substantially: the Core 7 350 offers 6 physical cores and 6 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 10 physical cores and 10 threads. Neither processor supports hyper-threading, as threads equal cores in both cases. The L1 cache is identical at 192 KB per core. L2 cache differs, with the Core 7 350 at 2.5 MB per core and the Core Ultra 5 225T at 3 MB per core. L3 cache is 6 MB shared for the Core 7 350 versus 20 MB shared for the Core Ultra 5 225T.

Memory support also differs. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Core Ultra 5 225T supports DDR5 only. The memory bus is single-channel for the Core 7 350 and dual-channel for the Core Ultra 5 225T, with bandwidth ratings of 59.7 GB/s and 102.4 GB/s respectively. Both processors lack ECC memory support.

PCIe capabilities are different as well. The Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 225T provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: the Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 16EU. The socket types are incompatible, with the Core 7 350 on Intel BGA 1516 and the Core Ultra 5 225T on Intel Socket 1851.

The base clocks are 1.50 GHz for the Core 7 350 and 2.50 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 225T, while boost clocks are close at 4.80 GHz and 4.90 GHz respectively. The release dates differ, with the Core 7 350 released on 2026-04-15 and the Core Ultra 5 225T released on 2024-12-31. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469 and the part number SAE3F, while the Core Ultra 5 225T has no recorded launch MSRP and an unknown part number.