Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H Comparison

Intel Core 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 5 225H are both mobile processors built on a 3 nm process, but they serve very different performance segments. The Core 7 350 is a 6-core, 6-thread part from the Wildcat Lake family, while the Core Ultra 5 225H is a 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake-H part. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core Ultra 5 225H dominates in multi-threaded and most compute-heavy workloads, while the Core 7 350 claims narrow victories in specific single-core Cinebench tests.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H is the clear winner in the vast majority of recorded benchmarks. Out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, it wins 15. Its advantages are largest in multi-threaded and parallel workloads. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 2397.5 against 1220 for the Core 7 350, a 49.1% lead. Cinebench R20 multicore shows a 46.5% advantage (10041 vs 5373), and Cinebench R23 multicore shows a 45.1% lead (14629.5 vs 8030). These results indicate the 14-core Ultra 5 225H provides roughly double the multi-core rendering performance of the 6-core Core 7 350.

The Ultra 5 225H also wins decisively in PassMark workloads. Data compression scores 283451 vs 143123 (49.5% higher), integer math scores 68520 vs 33734 (50.8% higher), and floating point math scores 86540 vs 42809 (50.5% higher). Prime number finding shows the largest relative gap at 51.4% (220 vs 107). Encryption, extended instructions, multithread, physics, and random string sorting all favor the Ultra 5 225H by margins between 37.5% and 49.5%.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins only two head-to-head tests, both in single-core Cinebench. It leads in Cinebench R15 singlecore by 1.2% (292 vs 288.5) and in Cinebench R23 singlecore by 3.9% (2046 vs 1969). These are small margins, but they show the Wildcat Lake design has competitive single-threaded Cinebench performance despite its much lower core count. In PassMark single-thread, however, the Ultra 5 225H takes the lead by 3.7% (4258 vs 4100), so the Core 7 350's single-core advantage is not consistent across all test suites.

The average benchmark score reflects the overall gap. The Core Ultra 5 225H averages 31508, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 350 averages 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile. The Ultra 5 225H's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13500 and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, both with average scores within 0.1% of its result. The Core 7 350 sits near the Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and Intel Core 5 120U, all within 0.7% of its average score.

The Verdict

The data supports two distinct use cases. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H is the appropriate choice for workloads that scale with core count and memory bandwidth. Its 14 cores and 14 threads, dual-channel memory bus, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache enable roughly 46-51% higher performance in multi-threaded Cinebench and PassMark workloads compared to the Core 7 350. The Ultra 5 225H also has a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus 4.80 GHz, and its PassMark single-thread score of 4258 exceeds the Core 7 350's 4100.

The Intel Core 7 350 is positioned for scenarios where its specific single-core Cinebench results matter. It wins Cinebench R15 singlecore by 1.2% and Cinebench R23 singlecore by 3.9%, and it draws less power with a 15 W TDP versus 28 W. For users prioritizing Cinebench single-core scores or lower power draw, the Core 7 350 has a narrow edge. Its 6 MB shared L3 cache and single-channel memory bus limit its multi-threaded potential, and the PassMark single-thread test shows it trailing by 3.7%.

The overall benchmark record favors the Core Ultra 5 225H. It wins 15 of 17 tests, holds an 82nd percentile ranking versus 71st, and its average score of 31508 is nearly double the Core 7 350's 17779. The Core 7 350's two wins are by margins of 1.2% and 3.9%, whereas the Ultra 5 225H's wins range from 3.7% to 51.4%. For most compute tasks, the recorded data indicates the Ultra 5 225H is the stronger processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Ultra 5 225H scores 220 versus 107, a 51.4% advantage. This workload exercises integer and branch-heavy code paths, and the 14-core part's extra throughput is decisive. PassMark integer math shows a 50.8% lead (68520 vs 33734), and floating point math shows a 50.5% lead (86540 vs 42809). These results confirm that the Ultra 5 225H's additional cores translate directly into parallel compute performance.

Cinebench R15 multicore shows the Ultra 5 225H at 2397.5 versus 1220, a 49.1% margin. The R20 and R23 multicore tests show margins of 46.5% and 45.1% respectively. The consistency of these margins across Cinebench versions indicates that the multi-core scaling is stable and not workload-specific. PassMark data compression (49.5% lead), data encryption (49% lead), and random string sorting (48.8% lead) all follow the same pattern.

The Core 7 350's wins are confined to single-core Cinebench. In Cinebench R15 singlecore, it scores 292 against 288.5, a 1.2% margin. In Cinebench R23 singlecore, it scores 2046 against 1969, a 3.9% margin. These are the only tests where the Core 7 350 outperforms the Ultra 5 225H. The Ultra 5 225H counters in PassMark single-thread with a 3.7% lead (4258 vs 4100), suggesting that the Core 7 350's single-core advantage depends on the specific benchmark methodology.

The smallest Ultra 5 225H win is 3.7% in PassMark single-thread. Its other wins are all above 37%, with physics showing a 37.5% margin (1877 vs 1173), extended instructions at 45% (21915 vs 12045), and multithread at 46.1% (28119 vs 15170). The data shows no test where the two processors are within a few percent except for the single-core Cinebench results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the single-core Cinebench results for each?

A: In Cinebench R23 singlecore, the Core 7 350 scores 2046 and the Ultra 5 225H scores 1969. In Cinebench R15 singlecore, the Core 7 350 scores 292 and the Ultra 5 225H scores 288.5.

Q: How do the processors compare in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Ultra 5 225H scores 14629.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Core 7 350 scores 8030. The Ultra 5 225H leads by 45.1%.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The Core 7 350 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Ultra 5 225H uses a dual-channel memory bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a higher PassMark single-thread score?

A: The Ultra 5 225H scores 4258 in PassMark single-thread, while the Core 7 350 scores 4100. The Ultra 5 225H leads by 3.7%.

Q: What are the TDP values?

A: The Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 W. The Ultra 5 225H has a TDP of 28 W.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-H codename and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2.

Core configuration differs substantially. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, with base clock of 1.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 225H has 14 cores and 14 threads, with base clock of 1.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Cache hierarchies differ in L2 and L3. Both list L1 cache as 192 KB per core. The Core 7 350 has 2.5 MB L2 per core and 6 MB shared L3. The Ultra 5 225H has 3 MB L2 per core and 18 MB shared L3. The larger L3 cache on the Ultra 5 225H aligns with its higher core count and multi-threaded performance.

Memory support is similar in type, with both supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the memory bus differs. The Core 7 350 uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Ultra 5 225H uses a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ. The Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The Ultra 5 225H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Ultra 5 225H's PCIe generation and lane count are higher.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Ultra 5 225H uses Arc Graphics 130T. The manufacturing foundries also differ: the Core 7 350 is fabricated by Intel, while the Ultra 5 225H is fabricated by TSMC, both on a 3 nm process.

The production status for both is Active. The Core 7 350 has a release date of 2026-04-15 and a launch MSRP of $469. The Ultra 5 225H has a release date of 2025-01-12. The Core 7 350 uses socket Intel BGA 1516, while the Ultra 5 225H uses socket Intel BGA 2049.