Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL Comparison

The Intel Core 7 350 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL represent two distinct approaches within Intel’s mobile and desktop lineups. The Core 7 350 is a 6-core, 6-thread processor built on a 3 nm process, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL is a 12-core, 14-thread part on a 7 nm node. The database contains a full benchmark suite for the Core 7 350, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL has no recorded benchmark scores, making a direct numerical comparison impossible. However, the available data for the Core 7 350, combined with its performance percentile and nearest rivals, provides a clear picture of its standing. The Core Ultra 5 125UL, with its different architecture, core count, and memory configuration, offers a contrasting specification profile that can be analyzed qualitatively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the Core Ultra 5 125UL has no entries in its benchmark array. Consequently, there are no direct scores to compare side by side. The database records zero wins for each processor in this category. This absence of data is itself informative: the Core 7 350 has been subjected to the full Cinebench and PassMark test suites, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL has not been measured in any of these workloads.

Focusing on the Core 7 350’s recorded results, the Cinebench tests show a consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1220 points in multi-core and 292 points in single-core. The R20 version yields 5373 points multi-core and 758 points single-core. The R23 test, which is often used as a more modern reference, shows 8030 points multi-core and 2046 points single-core. These numbers indicate a strong single-threaded performance relative to its multi-threaded output, a typical characteristic of a processor with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and only 6 threads.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The Core 7 350 achieves 143123 in data compression, 10933 in data encryption, and 12045 in extended instructions. Its floating point math score is 42809, while integer math reaches 33734. The multithread score is 15170, and the single-thread score is 4100. In physics, it records 1173, and random string sorting yields 17238. The find prime numbers test shows a notably low score of 107, which suggests that this particular workload is not a strength of the design.

To contextualize the Core 7 350, the database places it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 17779. The nearest rivals listed include the Intel Core 5 221TE with an average score of 17860 and a delta of -0.5%, meaning the Core 7 350 is 0.5% behind that part. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, placing the Core 7 350 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, a 0.6% gap, and the Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, a 0.7% gap. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Core 7 350 sits in a tightly contested performance band. It is neither a clear winner nor a laggard among its immediate peers; it is statistically level with them.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 have any benchmark scores recorded in the database?

A: Yes, the Core 7 350 has a full set of Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark scores. For example, it scores 8030 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2046 in single-core.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL have any benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists an empty benchmark array for the Core Ultra 5 125UL. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the Core 7 350?

A: The Core 7 350 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17779.

Q: How does the Core 7 350 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core 7 350 is within 0.7% of all four listed nearest rivals. It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9374F, and 0.5%, 0.6%, and 0.7% behind the Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and Intel Core 5 120U, respectively.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Core Ultra 5 125UL has 12 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 7 350 is a measured, active processor with a clear performance profile. Its 71st percentile ranking and average score of 17779 place it in the upper-middle range of all CPUs. The near-zero deltas against its nearest rivals confirm that it performs on par with the Intel Core 5 221TE, AMD EPYC 9374F, AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and Intel Core 5 120U. For any workload covered by the Cinebench or PassMark suites, the Core 7 350 delivers results that are statistically indistinguishable from those four parts.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmarks. The database shows zero scores, a 50th percentile placeholder, and an average benchmark score of 0. This is not a statement of poor performance but rather an absence of measurement. The Core Ultra 5 125UL cannot be ranked against the Core 7 350 or any other processor based on the recorded data. Its 12 cores, 14 threads, and dual-channel memory bus suggest a different design intent, but without scores, any performance claim would be speculative.

For a buyer or analyst relying strictly on the database, the Core 7 350 is the only one of the two with verifiable performance. The Core Ultra 5 125UL may be suitable for scenarios where its specifications are prioritized, but the database provides no evidence of its computational output. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Core 7 350 has a proven benchmark record, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL does not.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL has 12 cores and 14 threads. The base clock of the Core 7 350 is 1.50 GHz, compared to 1.30 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 125UL. The boost clock favors the Core 7 350 at 4.80 GHz versus 4.30 GHz.

The sockets are different: the Core 7 350 uses Intel BGA 1516, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL uses Intel Socket 1851. The memory support also diverges. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Core Ultra 5 125UL supports DDR5, with the database noting that the type depends on the motherboard, and uses a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe lanes differ as well. The Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 125UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are different: the Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe), while the Core Ultra 5 125UL uses Arc Xe-LPG 64EU. The market segments are also distinct, with the Core 7 350 listed as Mobile and the Core Ultra 5 125UL as Desktop.

Release dates and launch MSRP values are recorded. The Core 7 350 was released later, with a launch MSRP of $469. The Core Ultra 5 125UL was released earlier, with a launch MSRP of $309. Both parts are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are SAE3F for the Core 7 350 and SRN96 for the Core Ultra 5 125UL.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is pronounced. The Core 7 350 is codenamed Wildcat Lake, with a generation listed as Core 5 (Wildcat Lake). It is built on a 3 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 125UL is based on the Meteor Lake architecture, specifically codenamed Meteor Lake-PS, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1. Its process node is 7 nm, also fabricated by Intel.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Core 7 350 has an L1 cache of 192 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 6 MB shared. The Core Ultra 5 125UL has an L1 cache of 112 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 12 MB shared. The larger shared L3 on the Core Ultra 5 125UL aligns with its higher core count, while the per-core L1 and L2 caches are larger on the Core 7 350.

Neither processor lists transistor counts or die sizes in the database. Both have ECC memory support listed as false. The memory bus width is a key architectural difference: the Core 7 350 is single-channel, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL is dual-channel. This directly impacts the memory bandwidth figures, with the Core Ultra 5 125UL achieving 89.6 GB/s compared to 59.7 GB/s for the Core 7 350.

The integrated graphics architectures also differ. The Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL uses Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units. These represent different generations and capability tiers within Intel’s graphics lineup, though the database does not include any graphics benchmarks for either part.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Core 7 350 wins in every measurable category because it is the only processor with benchmark scores. It demonstrates a strong single-thread capability with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046, which is consistent with its 4.80 GHz boost clock. Its multi-core score of 8030 in R23 reflects its 6-thread design. In PassMark, its single-thread score of 4100 and multithread score of 15170 provide a reference for general productivity tasks.

The Core Ultra 5 125UL wins in specification-based comparisons where the database lists explicit advantages. It has double the core count (12 versus 6) and more than double the thread count (14 versus 6). Its dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth are superior to the single-channel 59.7 GB/s of the Core 7 350. The Core Ultra 5 125UL also offers more PCIe lanes (8 versus 6) and a larger shared L3 cache (12 MB versus 6 MB). Its launch MSRP of $309 is lower than the $469 of the Core 7 350, although pricing is not a performance metric.

For workloads that depend on memory bandwidth, such as certain data-intensive computations, the Core Ultra 5 125UL has a theoretical advantage due to its dual-channel configuration. For workloads that rely on high clock speeds and single-thread performance, the Core 7 350 has the recorded scores to back its capability. The Core Ultra 5 125UL, with its 12 cores and 14 threads, is positioned for parallel throughput, but the absence of benchmark data means its actual wins cannot be quantified. The Core 7 350, with its 71st percentile ranking, is the only part with empirical evidence of where it stands relative to other CPUs.