Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 7 350

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,220
3,812
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
292
296
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,373
13,059
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
758
1,843
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
8,030
24,595
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,046
2,103
passmark_data_compression
143,123
438,539
passmark_data_encryption
10,933
26,092
passmark_extended_instructions
12,045
25,718
passmark_find_prime_numbers
107
165
passmark_floating_point_math
42,809
93,836
passmark_integer_math
33,734
131,296
passmark_multithread
15,170
36,566
passmark_physics
1,173
2,252
passmark_random_string_sorting
17,238
48,544
passmark_single_thread
4,100
3,947
passmark_singlethread
4,100
3,947
geekbench_multicore
N/A
14,390
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,116

Analysis: Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data establishes a clear hierarchy between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Intel Core i7-14700HX. The Core i7-14700HX wins 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Core 7 350 wins only 2. The margin of victory in the Core i7-14700HX's favor is often substantial, particularly in multi-threaded workloads.

The largest single delta is in PassMark integer math, where the Core i7-14700HX scores 131296 against the Core 7 350's 33734, a 74.3% advantage. This pattern repeats across most compute-heavy tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core i7-14700HX delivers 24595 versus 8030, a 67.4% lead. PassMark data compression shows the same 67.4% gap, with scores of 438539 and 143123 respectively. Data encryption follows with a 58.1% difference (26092 vs 10933), while multithread performance in PassMark sits 58.5% higher for the Core i7-14700HX (36566 vs 15170).

The Core i7-14700HX also wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 58.9% (13059 vs 5373) and single-core by the same percentage (1843 vs 758). Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 68% gap (3812 vs 1220). Extended instructions favor the Core i7-14700HX by 53.2% (25718 vs 12045), floating point math by 54.4% (93836 vs 42809), random string sorting by 64.5% (48544 vs 17238), and physics by 47.9% (2252 vs 1173). Prime number finding is 35.2% higher on the Core i7-14700HX (165 vs 107).

The Core 7 350 takes only the PassMark single-thread test, scoring 4100 against the Core i7-14700HX's 3947, a 3.9% edge. Cinebench R15 single-core is nearly even, with the Core i7-14700HX ahead by just 1.4% (296 vs 292), and Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 2.7% gap (2103 vs 2046). These close single-thread results indicate that in lightly threaded scenarios, the two processors are comparable, with the Core 7 350 even holding a slight lead in one measurement.

The average benchmark score reinforces this split. The Core i7-14700HX averages 45953 across all recorded tests and sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. The Core 7 350 averages 17779 and sits at the 71st percentile. The Core i7-14700HX's nearest rivals, the AMD EPYC 7303 and AMD EPYC 4364P, match it almost exactly with 0% delta, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 trail by 0.2%. The Core 7 350's nearest rivals, the Intel Core 5 221TE and AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, are within 0.6% of its score, indicating it performs in a different class entirely.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head tests. The Intel Core 7 350 wins only 2, both of which are the PassMark single-thread test at 4100 vs 3947.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The Core i7-14700HX leads by 67.4% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (24595 vs 8030), 58.9% in Cinebench R20 multi-core (13059 vs 5373), and 68% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (3812 vs 1220). PassMark multithread shows a 58.5% gap (36566 vs 15170).

Q: Is the Core 7 350 competitive in single-thread workloads?

A: Yes, in the recorded data the Core 7 350 wins PassMark single-thread by 3.9% (4100 vs 3947). The Core i7-14700HX edges ahead in Cinebench R23 single-core by 2.7% (2103 vs 2046) and Cinebench R15 single-core by 1.4% (296 vs 292), but the differences are small.

Q: What do the average benchmark scores indicate?

A: The Core i7-14700HX has an average benchmark score of 45953 and ranks at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 350 averages 17779 and ranks at the 71st percentile. The Core i7-14700HX's average is roughly 2.6 times higher.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare to each processor?

A: The Core i7-14700HX matches the AMD EPYC 7303 and AMD EPYC 4364P with 0% delta, and sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235. The Core 7 350 is 0.5% below the Intel Core 5 221TE, 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and 0.7% below the Intel Core 5 120U.

Q: In which specific tasks does the Core i7-14700HX show its largest advantage?

A: The largest margin is PassMark integer math at 74.3% (131296 vs 33734). Other large gaps include Cinebench R15 multi-core at 68%, Cinebench R23 multi-core at 67.4%, and PassMark data compression at 67.4%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design generations and manufacturing processes. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm process node, while the Intel Core i7-14700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX on a 10 nm node. Both are manufactured by Intel.

Core counts differ dramatically. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The cache hierarchy also diverges. The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7-14700HX has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7-14700HX also has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 350 has no die size recorded.

Clock speeds favor the Core i7-14700HX on paper. Its base clock is 2.10 GHz and boost clock is 5.50 GHz, compared to the Core 7 350's 1.50 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The thermal design power also differs, with the Core 7 350 rated at 15 W and the Core i7-14700HX at 55 W.

Memory support and platform features separate the two further. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Core i7-14700HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The Core i7-14700HX supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 350 does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes, while the Core i7-14700HX provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core i7-14700HX uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Core 7 350 does not. Sockets differ too: the Core 7 350 uses Intel BGA 1516 and the Core i7-14700HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The Core 7 350 has a recorded launch MSRP of $469 and a release date in April 2026, while the Core i7-14700HX has no launch MSRP recorded and an earlier release date in January 2024.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core i7-14700HX is the stronger processor for compute-intensive work. It wins 15 of 17 recorded tests, with multi-core advantages ranging from 35.2% to 74.3%. Its 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of L3 cache, deliver results that place it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 45953 is roughly 2.6 times the Core 7 350's 17779.

The Core 7 350's single competitive area is single-thread PassMark performance, where it leads by 3.9%. In Cinebench single-core tests, the two are nearly tied, with the Core i7-14700HX ahead by only 1.4% and 2.7%. This suggests that for lightly threaded applications, the Core 7 350 is not significantly disadvantaged despite its lower core count and clock speeds. However, the Core 7 350's 6 cores and 6 threads cannot keep pace in parallel workloads. Its 71st percentile ranking and 15 W TDP indicate a design aimed at efficiency, while the Core i7-14700HX's 55 W TDP and larger die size point toward performance.

The data does not show any workload category where the Core 7 350 wins beyond the single PassMark single-thread test. Every multi-threaded, encryption, compression, physics, and instruction-heavy benchmark goes to the Core i7-14700HX by wide margins. For users prioritizing raw throughput, the Core i7-14700HX is the clear choice. For users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness in a lower-power package, the Core 7 350 holds a narrow edge in one metric but is otherwise comparable in single-core Cinebench results.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks are 1.50 GHz versus 2.10 GHz, and boost clocks are 4.80 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. TDP is 15 W versus 55 W. Sockets are Intel BGA 1516 versus Intel BGA 1964.

The process node differs: 3 nm for the Core 7 350, 10 nm for the Core i7-14700HX. The codenames are Wildcat Lake versus Raptor Lake-HX. The Core i7-14700HX has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 350 has none. L1 cache is 192 KB per core versus 80 KB per core, L2 cache is 2.5 MB per core versus 2 MB per core, and L3 cache is 6 MB shared versus 33 MB shared.

Memory support differs: the Core 7 350 uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core i7-14700HX uses DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with no bandwidth recorded. ECC support is absent on the Core 7 350 and present on the Core i7-14700HX. PCIe is Gen 4 with 6 lanes on the Core 7 350 versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core i7-14700HX. Integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) versus UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked on the Core 7 350 and unlocked on the Core i7-14700HX. Part numbers are SAE3F versus SRMXG. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, while the Core i7-14700HX has none recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700HX wins in every multi-threaded and parallel workload recorded. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests all show leads between 58.9% and 68%. PassMark multithread is 58.5% higher. Integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, random string sorting, physics, and prime number finding all favor the Core i7-14700HX by margins from 35.2% to 74.3%. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration and 33 MB L3 cache clearly drive these results.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a 3.9% edge (4100 vs 3947). This is its only recorded victory. In Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core, the Core 7 350 trails by only 1.4% and 2.7% respectively, meaning the single-thread performance gap is small. The 3 nm process node and higher L1 cache per core (192 KB vs 80 KB) may contribute to this competitive single-thread showing.

For workloads that scale with core count, the Core i7-14700HX is the decisive winner. For workloads that rely on a single thread, the Core 7 350 holds a marginal advantage in one measurement and is nearly even in others. The Core 7 350's 15 W TDP also indicates a lower power envelope than the Core i7-14700HX's 55 W rating, though the recorded data does not include power consumption measurements. The Core i7-14700HX supports ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, features absent from the Core 7 350. The Core 7 350 supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Core i7-14700HX does not.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 350
i7-14700HX
Core Specs
Cores
6
20 +233.3%
Threads
6
28 +366.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.5
2.1 +40.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.5 +14.6%
Frequency (GHz)
1.5
2.1 +40.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.8
5.5 +14.6%
Multiplier
15
21 +40.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
6 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
55 +266.7%
PL1
—
55 W
PL2
—
157 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Wildcat Lake
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh)
Process Size
3 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Single-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
59.7 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
6400 MT/s
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel BGA 1516
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
—
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
1500 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 17 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$469
—
Part Number
SAE3F
SRMXG
Package
FC-BGA
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 7 350 Details View Core i7-14700HX Details