Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE records an average benchmark score of 31143, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 350 achieves an average benchmark score of 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core 7 350 scores 8030. The Core 9 273PTE leads by 60.7%, which is the largest delta among all head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 7 350 outperform the Core 9 273PTE?

A: The Core 7 350 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4100 against 3433, a 19.4% advantage. It also edges out the Core 9 273PTE in Cinebench R15 single-core, 292 to 290, a 0.7% margin.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: What are the launch MSRPs of the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has a launch MSRP of $549.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The Core 7 350 uses 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Core 9 273PTE uses 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are close, 1.50 GHz for the Core 7 350 versus 1.40 GHz for the Core 9 273PTE, but the boost clocks diverge sharply: 4.80 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. Thermal design power also differs, 15 watts for the Core 7 350 and 45 watts for the Core 9 273PTE.

Cache geometry is substantially different. The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PTE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support separates the two as well. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 9 273PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the Core 9 273PTE only.

Platform connectivity differs. The Core 7 350 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 9 273PTE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Socket compatibility is also different: the Core 7 350 uses Intel BGA 1516, the Core 9 273PTE uses Intel Socket 1700. Integrated graphics differ, with the Core 7 350 using Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) and the Core 9 273PTE using UHD Graphics 730.

Process node and codename differ. The Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process under the Wildcat Lake codename. The Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process under the Bartlett Lake codename. Both are listed as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split in intended usage. The Intel Core 9 273PTE dominates multi-threaded workloads across the entire benchmark suite, winning 14 of 17 head-to-head tests. Its 12 cores and 24 threads deliver roughly double the multi-core throughput of the Core 7 350 in several tests, particularly Cinebench R23 multi-core where it leads by 60.7%. For desktop users running heavily threaded applications, rendering tasks, or compilation workloads, the Core 9 273PTE is the stronger choice.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins only 3 of 17 benchmarks, but its wins are meaningful. It holds a 19.4% lead in PassMark single-thread performance, which indicates a higher peak frequency per core in single-threaded scenarios. This processor is built for mobile use, with a 15 watt TDP and a single-channel memory bus, making it suited for thin-and-light systems where battery life and thermals matter more than raw throughput.

The Core 9 273PTE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700F with a delta of 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS also at 0.2%. The Core 7 350's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 221TE at -0.5% and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at -0.6%. These comparison points confirm that the Core 9 273PTE sits in a higher performance tier, while the Core 7 350 competes with mid-range processors.

Users who need ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and a dual-channel memory bus should select the Core 9 273PTE. Users who prioritize single-thread responsiveness and low power consumption in a mobile form factor should select the Core 7 350.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PTE's largest victory comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 20445 against 8030, a 60.7% advantage. The PassMark integer math test shows a similar gap: 82411 versus 33734, a 59.1% lead. These two results indicate that the Core 9 273PTE's additional cores scale well in purely computational workloads.

Cinebench R20 multi-core also favors the Core 9 273PTE, with 8586 against 5373, a 37.4% delta. PassMark data compression shows 258704 versus 143123, a 44.7% lead. PassMark random string sorting shows 28973 versus 17238, a 40.5% gap. PassMark physics shows 1917 versus 1173, a 38.8% advantage. PassMark multithread shows 24054 versus 15170, a 36.9% gap.

The Core 9 273PTE also wins all single-core Cinebench variants except one. In Cinebench R20 single-core, it scores 1212 against 758, a 37.5% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2886 against 2046, a 29.1% lead. The Core 7 350 wins Cinebench R15 single-core by a narrow 0.7% margin, 292 to 290.

Other PassMark tests favor the Core 9 273PTE with moderate margins. Data encryption shows 14253 versus 10933, a 23.3% gap. Extended instructions show 15952 versus 12045, a 24.5% gap. Find prime numbers shows 142 versus 107, a 24.6% gap. Floating point math shows 60673 versus 42809, a 29.4% gap.

The Core 7 350's only decisive win is PassMark single-thread, where it scores 4100 against 3433, a 19.4% margin. This result appears twice in the database under both PassMark single-thread and PassMark singlethread, confirming the measurement.

Architecture Differences

The Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and is built on a 3 nm process. The Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and a 10 nm process. Both are manufactured by Intel.

Core organization differs significantly. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, meaning each core supports two threads. This thread count difference directly explains the multi-core benchmark gaps.

Cache allocation per core is smaller on the Core 9 273PTE, with 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, versus 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 per core on the Core 7 350. However, the Core 9 273PTE has a much larger shared L3 cache at 36 MB, six times the 6 MB on the Core 7 350.

Memory architecture differs: the Core 7 350 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core 9 273PTE uses dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s. The Core 9 273PTE also supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, while the Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

PCIe capability is a major architectural divergence. The Core 9 273PTE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core 7 350 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes. This makes the Core 9 273PTE more suitable for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage.

Integrated graphics differ in architecture as well. The Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, a newer graphics design. The Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, an older integrated solution.

The Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core 7 350. ECC support is typically required in server or workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PTE wins in every multi-threaded workload category recorded. This includes all three Cinebench multi-core tests, PassMark multithread, data compression, integer math, floating point math, physics, random string sorting, data encryption, extended instructions, and find prime numbers. It also wins Cinebench R20 and R23 single-core tests, meaning its single-core performance is generally strong despite losing the PassMark single-thread test.

The Core 7 350 wins in exactly two distinct benchmark categories: PassMark single-thread and Cinebench R15 single-core. The PassMark single-thread win is substantial at 19.4%, suggesting the Core 7 350's 3 nm process and higher base clock per core allow it to sustain higher single-thread performance in that specific test. The Cinebench R15 single-core win is marginal at 0.7%.

For desktop workloads involving rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, or database operations, the Core 9 273PTE is the clear winner based on its consistent 23% to 61% margins across multi-threaded tests. Its 45 watt TDP reflects a design that assumes active cooling and consistent power delivery.

For mobile or low-power applications, the Core 7 350's 15 watt TDP and single-thread advantage make it the better fit. The single-channel memory bus and 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes indicate a platform designed for lightweight laptops rather than high-throughput desktops. The 3 nm process node also suggests better power efficiency per core.

The benchmark data does not show a scenario where the Core 7 350 wins a multi-threaded test. Users requiring ECC memory, dual-channel bandwidth, or PCIe Gen 5 must choose the Core 9 273PTE regardless of other considerations. Users prioritizing the highest possible single-thread PassMark score and minimal power draw should choose the Core 7 350.