Intel Core 7 253PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 7 253PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.8 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 245T

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 14 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,144
2,641
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
302
372
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
8,935
11,007
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,261
1,553
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
21,276
26,208
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,003
3,699
passmark_data_compression
275,828
283,812
passmark_data_encryption
15,500
23,656
passmark_extended_instructions
17,099
22,071
passmark_find_prime_numbers
82
324
passmark_floating_point_math
67,209
108,499
passmark_integer_math
119,552
88,676
passmark_multithread
25,031
30,833
passmark_physics
1,318
2,278
passmark_random_string_sorting
28,227
34,931
passmark_single_thread
3,794
4,367
passmark_singlethread
3,794
4,367

Analysis: Intel Core 7 253PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T

Intel Core 7 253PTE and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T are both active desktop processors from Intel, but they target different performance profiles. The recorded data shows the Core Ultra 5 245T wins 16 of 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Core 7 253PTE takes a single decisive victory. The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 5 245T is 38194, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 253PTE averages 34962, sitting in the 84th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the benchmark data is the consistent performance advantage held by the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T across nearly every workload. In the Cinebench suite, the Core Ultra 5 245T leads by a uniform 18.8% margin in all six tests. The multicore results show a score of 26208 in Cinebench R23 versus 21276 for the Core 7 253PTE, while the single-core test shows 3699 against 3003. The same 18.8% delta appears in Cinebench R15 (2641 versus 2144 multicore, 372 versus 302 single-core) and Cinebench R20 (11007 versus 8935 multicore, 1553 versus 1261 single-core). This consistent gap indicates a fundamental architectural advantage rather than workload-specific behavior.

The PassMark suite reveals a wider range of deltas. The largest victory for the Core Ultra 5 245T comes in the find prime numbers test, where it scores 324 against 82, a 74.7% advantage. Floating point math shows a 38.1% lead (108499 versus 67209), while physics performance is 42.1% ahead (2278 versus 1318). Data encryption delivers a 34.5% edge (23656 versus 15500), and extended instructions shows a 22.5% lead (22071 versus 17099). Multithreaded performance in PassMark is 18.8% higher (30833 versus 25031), matching the Cinebench multicore delta exactly.

The Core 7 253PTE secures its only win in the PassMark integer math test, scoring 119552 against 88676 for the Core Ultra 5 245T. That is a 34.8% advantage, the second-largest delta in either direction across all benchmarks. This result suggests the Core 7 253PTE has a particular strength in integer-heavy arithmetic that does not translate to other workloads. In the remaining PassMark tests, the Core Ultra 5 245T leads by smaller margins: data compression shows 283812 versus 275828 (a 2.8% edge), random string sorting shows 34931 versus 28227 (19.2%), and single-thread performance shows 4367 versus 3794 (13.1%).

The nearest rivals in the database reinforce the positioning of each processor. The Core 7 253PTE sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13800H, Intel Core i9-12900HX, Intel Xeon 6349P, and AMD Ryzen 5 150 in average score. The Core Ultra 5 245T similarly trades places within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 250, Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core i5-13600HX, and Intel Core i5-13600KF. These small deltas show both chips are tightly clustered with their direct competitors, yet the 9.3% average score gap between the two reviewed parts is substantial.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design families. The Core 7 253PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process node built by Intel, while the Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S codename with a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 245T belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and the Arrow Lake architecture, whereas the Core 7 253PTE does not have a listed architecture beyond its Bartlett Lake codename.

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads, indicating hyperthreading support, while the Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores but only 14 threads, meaning no hyperthreading. Despite fewer threads, the Core Ultra 5 245T still wins all multicore benchmarks by 18.8%, showing that its additional physical cores and newer architecture overcome the thread count disadvantage.

Cache organization differs at every level. The Core 7 253PTE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 245T has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 245T has more per-core cache but less total L3, a tradeoff that favors its higher single-thread performance.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 7 253PTE has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 245T has a higher base clock of 2.20 GHz but a lower boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The higher base clock of the Core Ultra 5 245T likely contributes to its single-core wins, while the higher boost clock of the Core 7 253PTE does not overcome the architectural gap.

Memory support shows a split. The Core 7 253PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 245T supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but the Core Ultra 5 245T has higher memory bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core 7 253PTE has Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 245T has Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 253PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 245T uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The Core Ultra 5 245T also has a smaller transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die, while the Core 7 253PTE does not have listed transistor or die size data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has an average benchmark score of 38194, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE averages 34962, a difference of 9.3% in favor of the Core Ultra 5 245T.

Q: Does the Core 7 253PTE win any benchmark at all?

A: Yes, the Core 7 253PTE wins the PassMark integer math test with a score of 119552 against 88676 for the Core Ultra 5 245T, a 34.8% advantage. It loses the other 16 head-to-head comparisons.

Q: How do the Cinebench results compare between the two?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T leads by 18.8% in all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, and R23, each with multicore and single-core variants). The R23 multicore scores are 26208 versus 21276, and the R23 single-core scores are 3699 versus 3003.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Core Ultra 5 245T has more physical cores but no hyperthreading.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core 7 253PTE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the 5.10 GHz boost clock of the Core Ultra 5 245T. However, the Core Ultra 5 245T has a higher base clock of 2.20 GHz versus 1.80 GHz.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each processor?

A: The Core 7 253PTE is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13800H, Intel Core i9-12900HX, Intel Xeon 6349P, and AMD Ryzen 5 150. The Core Ultra 5 245T is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 250, Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core i5-13600HX, and Intel Core i5-13600KF.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

  • Socket: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 7 253PTE, Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Process node: 10 nm for the Core 7 253PTE, 3 nm for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Foundry: Intel for the Core 7 253PTE, TSMC for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Cores: 10 for the Core 7 253PTE, 14 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Threads: 20 for the Core 7 253PTE, 14 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Base clock: 1.80 GHz for the Core 7 253PTE, 2.20 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Boost clock: 5.40 GHz for the Core 7 253PTE, 5.10 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • TDP: 45 for the Core 7 253PTE, 65 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • L1 cache: 80 KB per core for the Core 7 253PTE, 192 KB per core for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • L2 cache: 2 MB per core for the Core 7 253PTE, 3 MB per core for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • L3 cache: 33 MB shared for the Core 7 253PTE, 24 MB shared for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Memory support: DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core 7 253PTE, DDR5 only for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s for the Core 7 253PTE, 102.4 GB/s for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • PCIe lanes: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 7 253PTE, Gen 5 with 20 lanes for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 7 253PTE, Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Release date: 2026-03-08 for the Core 7 253PTE, 2025-01-06 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Launch MSRP: $384 for the Core 7 253PTE, $270 for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Transistors: Not listed for the Core 7 253PTE, 17,800 million for the Core Ultra 5 245T.
  • Die size: Not listed for the Core 7 253PTE, 243 mm² for the Core Ultra 5 245T.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T dominates the performance landscape in this comparison. It wins all Cinebench tests, all PassMark tests except integer math, and holds a higher average benchmark score. Its wins span single-threaded workloads (4367 versus 3794 in PassMark), multithreaded workloads (30833 versus 25031), and heavily parallel tasks like physics (2278 versus 1318) and floating point math (108499 versus 67209). The 74.7% lead in prime number finding (324 versus 82) highlights a substantial advantage in integer-heavy computational loops, while the 42.1% physics lead and 34.5% encryption lead show broad strength across different instruction patterns. The Core Ultra 5 245T also has a higher memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s) and more PCIe lanes (20 versus 16), which supports workloads that depend on memory throughput or expansion capability.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins exactly one benchmark: PassMark integer math with a 34.8% margin (119552 versus 88676). This single result indicates a specific strength in pure integer arithmetic that could benefit certain calculation-heavy applications. However, the Core 7 253PTE also offers features the Core Ultra 5 245T lacks, including DDR4 memory support and a larger 33 MB L3 cache. Its lower TDP of 45 versus 65 suggests it may fit into power-constrained system designs, though the database does not record cooling requirements. The Core 7 253PTE also has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz, but the recorded benchmark data shows that does not translate into single-thread performance wins, as the Core Ultra 5 245T leads by 13.1% in PassMark single-thread and 18.8% in Cinebench single-core tests. For integer math specifically, the Core 7 253PTE is the clear choice; for every other measured workload, the Core Ultra 5 245T delivers higher scores.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 253PTE
Ultra 5 245T
Core Specs
Cores
10
14 +40.0%
Threads
20
14 -30.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.8
2.2 +22.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.1 -5.6%
Frequency (GHz)
1.8
2.2 +22.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.1 -5.6%
Multiplier
18
22 +22.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
33 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
65 +44.4%
PL1
45 W
35 W
PL2
219 W
114 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Arrow Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
—
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
1700 MHz up to 4.5 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.2 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
$270
Part Number
SA4QK
SRVFF
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core 7 253PTE Details View Core Ultra 5 245T Details