Intel Core 7 253PTE vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The 253PTE also has a higher base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, compared to 1.50 GHz and 4.80 GHz on the 350.

Q: How do their manufacturing processes differ?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE is built on Intel's 10 nm process, while the Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process. The 350 also has a larger L1 cache per core (192 KB vs 80 KB) and a larger L2 cache per core (2.5 MB vs 2 MB), but the 253PTE has a much larger shared L3 cache (33 MB vs 6 MB).

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 350 does not. The 253PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, whereas the 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration.

Q: What are their average benchmark scores and percentiles?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has an average benchmark score of 34962 and sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779 and sits in the 71st percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE scores 21276 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 165% higher than the 350's score of 8030. This is the largest single benchmark margin between the two processors.

Q: Which processor wins in single-threaded PassMark testing?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 wins in PassMark single-thread testing with a score of 4100, which is 7.5% higher than the 253PTE's score of 3794.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design families. The Intel Core 7 253PTE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture and belongs to the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Intel Core 7 350 is based on the Wildcat Lake architecture and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. This architectural split explains most of the behavioral differences in the benchmark data.

The 253PTE uses a 10 nm process node, while the 350 uses a 3 nm node. The 350's newer process allows for a smaller, more power-efficient design, reflected in its 15 W TDP versus the 253PTE's 45 W TDP. The 350 also uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket and targets the mobile market segment, while the 253PTE uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets desktop systems.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The 253PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. The 350 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 6 MB of shared L3. The 253PTE's larger L3 pool is a significant advantage for workloads that repeatedly access a large working set.

Memory support also diverges. The 253PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a single-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the 253PTE offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the 350 offers Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The 253PTE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the 350 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe). The 350's newer graphics architecture is paired with a mobile focus, suggesting a different intended use case despite being in the same Core 7 naming family.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PTE dominates in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. It wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. Its 20 threads, large shared L3 cache, and dual-channel memory bandwidth give it a decisive edge in rendering, encoding, and parallel processing tasks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21276 versus 8030, a 165% advantage. In PassMark integer math, it scores 119552 versus 33734, a 254.4% advantage. These results indicate the 253PTE is the stronger choice for content creation, compilation, and any workload that scales with core count.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins 3 benchmark comparisons. It takes PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests with a score of 4100 versus 3794, a 7.5% advantage. It also wins PassMark find prime numbers with a score of 107 versus 82, a 23.4% advantage. The 350's higher per-core efficiency, enabled by the 3 nm process and newer Wildcat Lake architecture, shows in these single-threaded and specialized integer tasks. Its 15 W TDP also makes it suited for fanless or low-power mobile designs where sustained multi-core performance is less important than energy efficiency and light workload responsiveness.

For buyers prioritizing raw throughput, the 253PTE is the clear winner. For buyers prioritizing single-thread latency and power efficiency in a mobile form factor, the 350 has specific advantages. The two are not direct substitutes; they serve different market segments.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 253PTE | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 1.80 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $384 | $469 |

The Intel Core 7 253PTE has a launch MSRP of $384. The Intel Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 253PTE scores 2144 against 1220, a 75.7% advantage. In R15 single-core, the margin shrinks to 3.4% (302 versus 292), still favoring the 253PTE. In R20 multi-core, the 253PTE scores 8935 versus 5373, a 66.3% lead. In R20 single-core, the lead is 66.4% (1261 versus 758), which is unusually large for a single-threaded test and suggests the 350's lower boost clock and smaller cache hurt it in this specific workload. In R23 multi-core, the 253PTE's 21276 versus 8030 represents a 165% lead, the largest margin in the entire comparison. In R23 single-core, the 253PTE scores 3003 versus 2046, a 46.8% lead.

The PassMark suite tells a more nuanced story. In data compression, the 253PTE scores 275828 versus 143123, a 92.7% lead. In data encryption, it scores 15500 versus 10933, a 41.8% lead. In extended instructions, it scores 17099 versus 12045, a 42% lead. In floating point math, it scores 67209 versus 42809, a 57% lead. In integer math, the 253PTE's 119552 versus 33734 is a 254.4% lead, the largest PassMark margin. In multithread, it scores 25031 versus 15170, a 65% lead. In physics, it scores 1318 versus 1173, a 12.4% lead. In random string sorting, it scores 28227 versus 17238, a 63.7% lead.

The 350's wins are narrower. In PassMark single-thread, it scores 4100 versus 3794, a 7.5% lead. In PassMark find prime numbers, it scores 107 versus 82, a 23.4% lead. These wins show that the 350's newer architecture and larger per-core caches deliver real single-threaded advantages, but they do not offset the 253PTE's massive multi-threaded superiority.

The aggregate data reinforces this split. The 253PTE wins 14 benchmarks; the 350 wins 3. The 253PTE's average benchmark score of 34962 places it near rivals like the Intel Core i7-13800H (34988, -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003, -0.1% delta). The 350's average score of 17779 places it near the Intel Core 5 221TE (17860, -0.5% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (17891, -0.6% delta). The 253PTE competes with high-end mobile and desktop HX parts, while the 350 competes with mid-range desktop and low-power mobile parts.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 253PTE is the stronger processor in nearly every measurable way. It has more cores, more threads, higher clocks, a larger L3 cache, dual-channel memory, ECC support, PCIe Gen 5, and a 45 W TDP. Its benchmark results confirm this: it leads by 165% in Cinebench R23 multi-core and by 254.4% in PassMark integer math. The 253PTE is the correct choice for desktop users running rendering, compilation, encryption, or any workload that uses many threads. Its 84th percentile ranking and average score of 34962 place it in the same performance class as the Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-12900HX.

The Intel Core 7 350 is a different kind of product. Its 3 nm process, 15 W TDP, and mobile BGA socket target low-power laptops and compact systems. It wins PassMark single-thread testing by 7.5% and PassMark find prime numbers by 23.4%, showing that its newer Wildcat Lake architecture delivers better per-core efficiency. But its 6 cores, 6 threads, single-channel memory, and 6 MB L3 cache limit it to light workloads. Its average benchmark score of 17779 places it near the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, a much older desktop part, and its 71st percentile ranking is 13 points below the 253PTE.

The data indicates these processors should not be compared as direct rivals. The 253PTE is a desktop-first, multi-threaded performer with a $384 launch MSRP. The 350 is a mobile-first, power-efficient part with a $469 launch MSRP. Buyers who need sustained multi-core performance should choose the 253PTE. Buyers who need a low-power, single-thread-capable mobile processor with a newer graphics block should choose the 350. There is no benchmark scenario in the recorded data where the 350 approaches the 253PTE's multi-core output, and no scenario where the 253PTE approaches the 350's single-thread PassMark score. The choice depends entirely on the workload and the platform.