Intel Core 7 253PQE vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a dominant performance across the board for the Intel Core 7 253PQE. Out of 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, it wins all 17, with no benchmark favoring the Intel Core i5-14400F. The margins are substantial, ranging from a modest single-thread advantage to more than double the score in one specific workload.

Starting with Cinebench results, the Core 7 253PQE leads by a consistent margin of 45% across all three versions of the test, both single-core and multi-core. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 7 253PQE scores 31,390 against 21,645 for the i5-14400F, a 45% advantage. The single-core result in Cinebench R23 is 4,431 versus 3,055, also exactly 45% ahead. This consistency is notable: the same 45% delta appears in Cinebench R15 and R20 for both single and multi-threaded runs. The narrowest overall gap in the entire dataset appears in PassMark single-thread tests, where the Core 7 253PQE scores 4,389 versus 3,701, a lead of 18.6%.

The largest performance gap occurs in PassMark's find prime numbers test. Here the Core 7 253PQE scores 206 while the i5-14400F scores 86, which is a 139.5% advantage. This is the only test where the delta exceeds 100%. Also notable is the PassMark physics test, where the Core 7 253PQE scores 2,970 against 1,523, a 95% lead. Floating point math shows a 71.7% delta (105,279 vs. 61,319), and integer math shows a 69% delta (137,795 vs. 81,524). The extended instructions test shows a 62.5% delta (32,390 vs. 19,937).

Data compression and encryption workloads, which are common in everyday computing, show strong advantages as well. The Core 7 253PQE scores 487,335 in data compression versus 315,521 for the i5-14400F, a 54.5% lead. Data encryption scores are 25,515 versus 16,949, a 50.5% lead. Random string sorting follows with 54,222 versus 32,680, a 65.9% lead. The multithread PassMark score is 41,656 for the Core 7 253PQE versus 25,470 for the i5-14400F, a 63.5% lead. In every single recorded metric, the data confirms the same direction of the result.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark wins, the Intel Core 7 253PQE is the clear winner in every measured category. The data shows no test where the Intel Core i5-14400F takes a lead. However, the shape of the wins matters for interpreting use cases.

The Core 7 253PQE's smallest advantage is in single-threaded PassMark (18.6% ahead), which is still a solid gain for lightly threaded applications. Its largest advantages are in prime number finding, physics simulation, and floating point math, which are compute-heavy workloads that benefit from higher core counts, more threads, and higher boost clocks. The Core 7 253PQE has 20 threads versus 16 for the i5-14400F, and its boost clock is 5.70 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. This combination explains the wide margin in multi-threaded tests.

For workloads like Cinebench rendering, the 45% lead in every version of the test indicates a strong position for content creation tasks that scale across cores. For data compression and encryption, the 50% to 55% leads suggest faster file archiving and secure data handling. The extended instructions test, with a 62.5% lead, indicates better performance in SIMD-heavy applications. The physics test, at 95% ahead, is particularly relevant for simulation workloads. There is no benchmark category in the recorded data where the i5-14400F offers an advantage, so the use-case split is straightforward: the Core 7 253PQE is preferable for every measured workload.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has an average benchmark score of 55,919, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32,279. The Core 7 253PQE sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14400F sits at the 83rd percentile.

Q: How does the single-core performance compare?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 7 253PQE scores 4,431 versus 3,055 for the i5-14400F, a 45% lead. In PassMark single-thread, the Core 7 253PQE scores 4,389 versus 3,701, an 18.6% lead.

Q: What is the difference in thread count?

A: The Core 7 253PQE has 20 threads, while the i5-14400F has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The Core 7 253PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14400F has no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Core 7 253PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor?

A: For the Core 7 253PQE, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.2% lower average score), AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (0.6% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (0.7% lower), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (1.1% lower). For the i5-14400F, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (0.1% higher), Intel Core i9-11900 (0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (0.2% lower), and Intel Core i7-12800H (0.5% higher).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The Core 7 253PQE has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The i5-14400F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Both use the same socket (Intel Socket 1700) and are unlocked multipliers are false for both.

The Core 7 253PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the i5-14400F has a TDP of 65 watts. The Core 7 253PQE has an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, while the i5-14400F has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 33 MB shared for the Core 7 253PQE versus 20 MB shared for the i5-14400F. Both have 80 KB L1 cache per core.

The i5-14400F has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core 7 253PQE has no die size recorded. The Core 7 253PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the i5-14400F has no memory bandwidth figure. The Core 7 253PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics. The launch MSRP for the Core 7 253PQE is $409, and the launch MSRP for the i5-14400F is $196. The release date for the Core 7 253PQE is March 8, 2026, while the i5-14400F was released on January 7, 2024. The part numbers are SA4QA for the Core 7 253PQE and SRN3RSRN47 for the i5-14400F.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built by Intel on a 10 nm process node and both use the Intel Socket 1700. The Core 7 253PQE uses the codename Bartlett Lake and belongs to the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The i5-14400F uses the codename Raptor Lake-R, belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation, and has the architecture listed as Raptor Lake.

Both have 10 cores, but the thread counts differ: 20 for the Core 7 253PQE versus 16 for the i5-14400F. The cache hierarchy differs in both L2 and L3. The Core 7 253PQE has 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB shared L3. The i5-14400F has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 20 MB shared L3. Both support ECC memory and both offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Core 7 253PQE has integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics. The Core 7 253PQE also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is absent from the i5-14400F's data.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core 7 253PQE outperforms the Intel Core i5-14400F in every recorded test. The margins range from 18.6% in PassMark single-thread to 139.5% in prime number finding. The average benchmark score difference is 55,919 versus 32,279, which places the Core 7 253PQE at the 91st percentile of all CPUs versus the 83rd percentile for the i5-14400F.

The Core 7 253PQE is the appropriate choice for any workload that benefits from higher multi-threaded throughput, given its 45% lead across all Cinebench versions and its 63.5% lead in PassMark multithread. Its higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz also gives it a single-thread advantage, though that lead is smaller at 18.6% in PassMark. The i5-14400F, with a 65 watt TDP versus 125 watts, may be considered for power-limited scenarios, but the recorded data does not include any power efficiency metrics. The i5-14400F also lacks integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is required for any display output. The Core 7 253PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, which is a functional difference for systems without a dedicated GPU.

For users prioritizing raw performance in rendering, physics simulation, encryption, and math-heavy tasks, the Core 7 253PQE delivers a substantial and consistent advantage. The i5-14400F remains a capable processor in absolute terms, but in every direct comparison within this database, it trails the Core 7 253PQE by a considerable margin. The data supports a clear preference for the Core 7 253PQE in performance-focused desktop builds, while the i5-14400F serves as a lower-power alternative with no recorded performance advantage in any measured workload.