Intel Core 7 253PE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a complete sweep for the Intel Core 7 253PE across all four directly compared tests. The Core 7 253PE wins 4 out of 4 head-to-head matchups, while the Intel Processor N150 records no wins. The most dramatic margin appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 7 253PE scores 24,880 against 2,590.5 for the N150, a 860.4% advantage. This represents the largest performance gap in the entire comparison and reflects the substantial difference in core count and threading capability.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core 7 253PE scores 2,507 versus 422.5 for the N150, resulting in a 493.4% delta. Single-core results are less extreme but still lopsided. The Core 7 253PE posts 3,512 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the N150 manages 935, a 275.6% difference. The narrowest gap appears in Cinebench R15 single-core, where 354 beats 153.15, a 131.1% advantage. Even that smallest margin indicates the Core 7 253PE delivers more than double the single-thread performance of the N150.

The average benchmark score in the database reinforces this separation. The Core 7 253PE holds an average score of 40,557, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The N150 averages 1,025, sitting at the 28th percentile. The Core 7 253PE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 223PE at 40,585 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40,518 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40,630 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40,431 (0.3% ahead). The N150's nearest rivals are far lower in the ranking: the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T at 1,024 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i3-4340 at 1,026 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U at 1,024 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-5650U at 1,027 (0.2% behind). These figures confirm that the Core 7 253PE competes in a completely different performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a manufacturing foundation: both use Intel's 10 nm process node and are produced at Intel foundries. Beyond that, the architectural designs diverge sharply. The Core 7 253PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation with a Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) designation. The N150 carries the Twin Lake codename and is classified under Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) generation. The Core 7 253PE uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264, which is a soldered mobile package.

Core configuration shows the clearest architectural split. The Core 7 253PE provides 10 cores and 20 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The N150 provides 4 cores and 4 threads with no multithreading support. Base clocks differ substantially: the Core 7 253PE runs at 2.50 GHz with a 5.50 GHz boost, while the N150 lists a 0.10 GHz base clock and a 3.60 GHz boost. The very low base clock on the N150 indicates a design focused on power efficiency rather than sustained high-frequency operation. Thermal design power confirms this: the Core 7 253PE has a 65 W TDP, while the N150 sits at just 6 W.

Cache layouts also differ. The Core 7 253PE uses 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core, with 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The N150 uses 96 KB L1 per core and 2 MB of shared L2, with only 6 MB of shared L3. The Core 7 253PE's L3 cache is more than five times larger. Memory support diverges as well. The Core 7 253PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory enabled. The N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 over a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity differs by two generations: the Core 7 253PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the N150 offers Gen 3 with 9 lanes. Both chips integrate the same UHD Graphics 730, and both have locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 7 253PE scores 24,880 versus 2,590.5 for the N150, a 860.4% difference. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the scores are 2,507 versus 422.5, a 493.4% difference.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5. The N150 additionally supports LPDDR5. The Core 7 253PE uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the N150 uses single-channel memory with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N150 does not.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The Core 7 253PE has a 65 W TDP, and the N150 has a 6 W TDP.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40,557, placing it at the 87th percentile. The N150 has an average score of 1,025, placing it at the 28th percentile.

Specification Differences

The specification table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ. Fields not listed are identical or not applicable.

| Specification | Intel Core 7 253PE | Intel Processor N150 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 20 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 6 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Twin Lake |

| Generation | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-11-19 |

| Launch MSRP | $384 | Not available |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins every measured benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Its strongest areas are multi-core workloads, where the combination of 10 cores, 20 threads, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache produces a 860.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 493.4% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core performance also favors the Core 7 253PE, with a 275.6% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 131.1% advantage in Cinebench R15 single-core. The processor's additional benchmark results from the PassMark suite show strong capabilities in integer math at 114,158, floating point math at 80,870, and data compression at 339,133. These scores place the chip at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The Intel Processor N150 does not win any head-to-head benchmark. Its advantage lies outside raw performance. With a 6 W TDP compared to 65 W, the N150 is designed for low-power mobile environments. Its support for LPDDR5 memory and its BGA 1264 socket indicate a compact, soldered platform. The N150 also carries a larger L1 cache per core at 96 KB versus 80 KB, and its 2 MB L2 is shared across all cores rather than per core. The N150's average benchmark score of 1,025 places it at the 28th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and the Intel Core i3-4340, both within 0.1% to 0.2% of its score. For workloads that require minimal compute and maximum power efficiency, the N150 provides a functional baseline, but it does not match the Core 7 253PE in any recorded test.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation in intended use cases. The Intel Core 7 253PE delivers desktop-class performance with 10 cores, 20 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 33 MB of L3 cache. Its average benchmark score of 40,557 places it among the 87th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, both within 0.3% of its score. This processor suits workloads that demand high multi-threaded throughput, large cache capacity, dual-channel memory bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. The 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 form factor confirm a desktop-oriented design.

The Intel Processor N150 serves a different role entirely. Its 4 cores, 4 threads, and 6 W TDP position it for low-power mobile systems. The single-channel memory bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth limit memory-intensive tasks, and the lack of ECC support further narrows its applicability. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and the Intel Core i3-4340, are older processors from a lower performance tier. The N150's 28th percentile ranking reflects its modest compute capabilities.

For users selecting between these two, the decision hinges on the workload environment. The Core 7 253PE is the appropriate choice for desktop systems where performance is the priority, particularly for multi-core rendering, compilation, or data processing tasks. The N150 is suitable for compact mobile devices where the 6 W TDP and LPDDR5 memory support matter more than benchmark scores. The 860.4% multi-core gap in Cinebench R23 is the defining statistic: the Core 7 253PE is not a faster version of the N150, it is a fundamentally different class of processor. The N150's only recorded advantages are its lower power envelope, its additional LPDDR5 memory support, and its larger L1 cache per core. For every measured performance metric, the Core 7 253PE holds the lead, and the database records no scenario where the N150 outperforms it.