Intel Core 7 253PE vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison
Intel Core 7 253PE
Core i9-14900
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 253PE vs Intel Core i9-14900
The Verdict
The benchmark data separates these two Intel desktop processors into distinct roles. The Intel Core i9-14900 wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, including every multi-threaded workload, and holds a higher average benchmark score of 58115 compared to 40557 for the Intel Core 7 253PE. The Core i9-14900 also sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 253PE ranks in the 87th percentile.
The Intel Core 7 253PE claims only 2 wins, but both are significant in the single-core domain. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 12.4% and Cinebench R23 single-core by 58.8%. For workloads that rely on one or two threads, this processor is the stronger choice. For everything else, the Core i9-14900 is the clear pick. The data indicates that users running heavily threaded applications, content creation suites, or data processing tasks should select the Core i9-14900. Users prioritizing maximum single-thread performance in lightly threaded applications should consider the Core 7 253PE.
Architecture Differences
Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700 platform and are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. They share the same per-core L1 cache of 80 KB and per-core L2 cache of 2 MB. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. ECC memory support appears on both parts.
The Core i9-14900 is a Raptor Lake Refresh part, using the Raptor Lake architecture with a die size of 257 mm². It integrates UHD Graphics 770. The Core 7 253PE is a Bartlett Lake part with a different codename and generation designation. It integrates UHD Graphics 730. The integrated graphics difference is notable for systems that rely on the iGPU.
Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Core i9-14900 also has a larger shared L3 cache at 36 MB versus 33 MB on the Core 7 253PE. Base clocks differ as well, with the Core 7 253PE running at 2.50 GHz and the Core i9-14900 at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks favor the Core i9-14900 at 5.80 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. Both parts have a TDP of 65 watts and are not multiplier-unlocked.
The Core i9-14900 launched earlier with a launch MSRP of $549. The Core 7 253PE launched with a launch MSRP of $384. Memory bandwidth for the Core 7 253PE is listed at 89.6 GB/s, while no figure appears in the database for the Core i9-14900. Both processors are active in production.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data shows the Core 7 253PE wins exclusively in Cinebench single-core tests. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 354 against 315, a 12.4% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3512 against 2212, a 58.8% advantage. These results indicate a substantial lead in short, single-threaded rendering tasks. The Core 7 253PE also edges out the Core i9-14900 in Cinebench R20 single-core in terms of percentage, but the database records the Core i9-14900 as the winner there with a score of 2245 versus 1475, a 34.3% delta. That result is inconsistent with the other single-core wins and reflects a single test anomaly in the data.
The Core i9-14900 wins every PassMark test in the head-to-head set. The largest deltas come in data compression, where it leads by 38.4%, and random string sorting, where it leads by 46.3%. Data encryption shows a 45.2% lead. Integer math, floating point math, and extended instructions all favor the Core i9-14900 by margins between 28.8% and 34.8%. Multi-threaded Cinebench results also favor the Core i9-14900, with a 47.7% lead in R15, a 34.3% lead in R20, and a 19.9% lead in R23.
For single-threaded PassMark tests, the Core i9-14900 still wins, scoring 4323 against 3955, an 8.5% margin. That is the narrowest win for the Core i9-14900 across the entire benchmark set. The Core 7 253PE shows a higher Cinebench single-core score in R23, but the PassMark single-thread suite favors the Core i9-14900. This split suggests the Core 7 253PE excels specifically in Cinebench's rendering workload but falls behind in more varied single-threaded tasks.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads.
Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core Cinebench tests?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900 wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests. It leads by 47.7% in R15, 34.3% in R20, and 19.9% in R23.
Q: Does the Intel Core 7 253PE win any benchmarks?
A: Yes, it wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 12.4% and Cinebench R23 single-core by 58.8%. These are the only two wins recorded in the head-to-head data.
Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58115. The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40557.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Both also support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900 uses UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses UHD Graphics 730.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The single-core Cinebench results are the defining story for the Core 7 253PE. In Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 354 versus 315, a 12.4% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the margin expands to 58.8%, with scores of 3512 versus 2212. These are the only two tests where the Core 7 253PE comes out ahead, but the magnitude of the R23 win is substantial. The Core i9-14900 counters in Cinebench R20 single-core, scoring 2245 versus 1475, a 34.3% lead. That result is the outlier in the single-core comparison. PassMark single-thread also favors the Core i9-14900, with a score of 4323 versus 3955, an 8.5% margin.
Multi-core results consistently favor the Core i9-14900. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows the largest gap, with 4793 versus 2507, a 47.7% delta. Cinebench R20 multi-core follows with 15910 versus 10449, a 34.3% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 31070 versus 24880, a 19.9% delta. The Core i9-14900's advantage narrows as the workload duration increases, but it remains ahead in every case.
The PassMark suite delivers uniform results in favor of the Core i9-14900. Data compression shows 550271 versus 339133, a 38.4% lead. Random string sorting shows 61060 versus 32777, a 46.3% lead. Data encryption shows 33540 versus 18385, a 45.2% lead. Integer math scores 175010 versus 114158, a 34.8% lead. Floating point math scores 120262 versus 80870, a 32.8% lead. Extended instructions score 30624 versus 21806, a 28.8% lead. Find prime numbers scores 188 versus 138, a 26.6% lead. Physics scores 2486 versus 1845, a 25.8% lead. Multithread scores 44578 versus 29271, a 34.3% lead.
The Core i9-14900 records 15 wins in the head-to-head set. The Core 7 253PE records 2 wins. The average benchmark score difference reinforces this pattern, with 58115 against 40557, a gap of roughly 43%. The percentile rankings also separate the two, with the Core i9-14900 at 92 and the Core 7 253PE at 87. The nearest rivals for each processor confirm their placement in the broader market. The Core 7 253PE sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon 6357P. The Core i9-14900 sits within 1% of the AMD EPYC 9015 and within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon w5-2545.