Intel Core 7 253PE vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core counts of each processor?

A: Both the Intel Core 7 253PE and the Intel Core i5-14490F have 10 cores. However, the Core 7 253PE supports 20 threads, while the Core i5-14490F supports 16 threads.

Q: How do their boost clocks differ?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is higher than the 5.00 GHz boost clock of the Intel Core i5-14490F. Both share the same 2.50 GHz base clock.

Q: What is the difference in their process nodes?

A: Both processors are built on a 10 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel. The Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename.

Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a shared L3 cache of 33 MB, which is larger than the 24 MB shared L3 cache found on the Intel Core i5-14490F.

Q: What are the memory and ECC differences?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The Core 7 253PE supports ECC memory and has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, whereas the Core i5-14490F does not support ECC and has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Q: Do both CPUs have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core 7 253PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (N/A).

The Verdict

The data from the database indicates a clear overall winner in the Intel Core 7 253PE, which secures 14 benchmark wins against 3 for the Core i5-14490F. Its average benchmark score of 40557 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the i5-14490F's average score of 38149 and 86th percentile. The Core 7 253PE delivers decisive advantages in compute-heavy workloads, especially integer and floating-point math, where it leads by 30% and 21.5%, respectively. The Core i5-14490F, however, retains specific wins in physics simulation, random string sorting, and data compression, indicating that its architecture handles certain specialized tasks with greater efficiency. Users should choose the Core 7 253PE for general multi-threaded performance and content creation, while the Core i5-14490F remains competitive in narrow, specific workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a consistent pattern: the Intel Core 7 253PE dominates in almost every Cinebench test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core 7 253PE scores 2507 against 2318, a delta of 8.2%. Its single-core advantage is similar, with a score of 354 versus 327, an 8.3% lead. This trend repeats in Cinebench R20, where the Core 7 253PE posts 10449 multicore and 1475 single-core, compared to 9660 and 1363 for the i5-14490F, both deltas at 8.2%. In Cinebench R23, the Core 7 253PE achieves 24880 multicore and 3512 single-core, while the i5-14490F scores 23000 and 3247, again an 8.2% difference in both cases.

The Passmark results reveal a more nuanced picture. The Core 7 253PE wins the majority of these tests, but not always by large margins. In data encryption, it scores 18385 versus 18225, a slim 0.9% lead. In extended instructions, the margin is 0.3%, with scores of 21806 and 21731. The multithread test shows a 2.1% advantage for the Core 7 253PE, scoring 29271 against 28662. Its single-thread score of 3955 beats the i5-14490F's 3873 by 2.1%.

The most dramatic differences appear in math-related benchmarks. The Core 7 253PE scores 114158 in integer math, a massive 30% lead over the i5-14490F's 87844. In floating-point math, the Core 7 253PE scores 80870 against 66558, a 21.5% advantage. In find prime numbers, the Core 7 253PE leads by 13.1%, scoring 138 versus 122.

The i5-14490F does claim three wins. Its most significant victory is in physics, where it scores 2093 against 1845, an 11.8% lead. It also wins in random string sorting with 35608 versus 32777, an 8% advantage, and in data compression with 340026 versus 339133, a narrow 0.3% lead.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several core specifications: both have 10 cores, a 2.50 GHz base clock, 65 W TDP, Intel Socket 1700, and a 10 nm process node. The primary specification differences are in thread count, cache hierarchy, and additional features.

The Core 7 253PE supports 20 threads, while the i5-14490F supports 16 threads. The L2 cache differs, with the Core 7 253PE having 2 MB per core and the i5-14490F having 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache also differs, with the Core 7 253PE featuring 33 MB shared versus 24 MB shared on the i5-14490F.

Memory bandwidth is another differentiator: the Core 7 253PE has a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14490F has no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support is present on the Core 7 253PE but absent on the i5-14490F. The Core 7 253PE includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, whereas the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

The release dates are distinct, with the Core 7 253PE released in 2026 and the i5-14490F in 2023. The launch MSRP for the Core 7 253PE is $384, while no MSRP is recorded for the i5-14490F. The die size for the i5-14490F is 215 mm², but no die size is recorded for the Core 7 253PE. Both processors have locked multipliers and support Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two CPUs is notable. The Intel Core 7 253PE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, representing the "Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)" generation, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)" generation with a Raptor Lake architecture.

The process nodes are identical at 10 nm, and both are fabricated by Intel. The cache architecture, however, diverges significantly. The Core 7 253PE has a per-core L1 cache of 80 KB and a per-core L2 cache of 2 MB, whereas the i5-14490F has the same per-core L1 cache but a smaller per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB. The shared L3 cache is also larger on the Core 7 253PE at 33 MB versus 24 MB.

Feature support differs in memory and graphics. The Core 7 253PE supports ECC memory, which the i5-14490F does not. The Core 7 253PE also includes UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics at all. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and both offer Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes.

The thread count difference, 20 versus 16, stems from the architecture's implementation of hyper-threading capabilities. The boost clock difference (5.50 GHz versus 5.00 GHz) further separates the two, with the Core 7 253PE operating at a higher frequency ceiling despite the same base clock.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PE is the dominant choice for multi-threaded and math-intensive workloads. Its 30% lead in integer math and 21.5% lead in floating-point math indicate a strong advantage for scientific computing, engineering simulations, and code compilation. The 13.1% lead in find prime numbers suggests efficient prime-number generation, relevant for cryptography and hashing tasks. Its consistent 8.2% lead across all Cinebench versions, both single-core and multi-core, makes it the better option for 3D rendering and general CPU-bound creative applications. The Core 7 253PE also wins in data encryption by 0.9% and extended instructions by 0.3%, showing minor but consistent superiority in these secondary tasks.

The Intel Core i5-14490F claims wins in three specific areas. Its 11.8% lead in physics simulation suggests it handles rigid body dynamics and game physics calculations more efficiently, a potential advantage for certain game engines. The 8% lead in random string sorting indicates faster sorting algorithms, which could benefit database operations and text-processing tasks. Its narrow 0.3% win in data compression shows it is slightly more efficient at compressing data, a relevant factor for file archiving and backup workflows.

For users prioritizing raw computational throughput across a broad range of benchmarks, the data points firmly to the Intel Core 7 253PE. For those with workloads specifically centered on physics simulation, string sorting, or data compression, the Intel Core i5-14490F offers measurable benefits in those niches, despite its overall lower average score and percentile ranking.