Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Intel Core 7 251TE and Intel Processor 300T occupy opposite ends of Intel’s desktop lineup, yet both target the same LGA1700 socket. The database shows a 24-core, 32-thread powerhouse facing a 2-core, 4-thread entry point. Their benchmark gap is vast, but the data also reveals distinct design philosophies. Below is a breakdown of the recorded specifications, performance scores, and market positioning.

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE features 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. This is a 12x difference in core count and an 8x difference in thread count.

Q: What is the boost clock situation for each chip?

A: The Core 7 251TE boosts up to 5.40 GHz from a 1.40 GHz base clock. The Processor 300T has a 3.40 GHz base clock and no listed boost clock in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 7 251TE records an average benchmark score of 41650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. However, the Core 7 251TE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Processor 300T has no bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Is ECC memory supported on either chip?

A: The Core 7 251TE supports ECC memory. The Processor 300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The Core 7 251TE uses Intel UHD Graphics 770, while the Processor 300T uses Intel UHD Graphics 710.

Architecture Differences

The two processors stem from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 7 251TE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 7 generation. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. Both are fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node at Intel’s own foundry, but the die sizes differ: the Core 7 251TE measures 215 mm², while the Processor 300T is smaller at 163 mm².

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache is where the gap emerges: the Core 7 251TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Processor 300T has only 6 MB. This 6x difference in L3 capacity directly impacts multi-threaded workloads that rely on shared data.

The Core 7 251TE also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Processor 300T. Both use the same PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the Core 7 251TE carries UHD Graphics 770, while the Processor 300T has the lower-tier UHD Graphics 710. The Core 7 251TE was released on January 12, 2025, while the Processor 300T appeared earlier on January 7, 2024.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation in intended workloads. The Intel Core 7 251TE delivers 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.40 GHz boost clock, which produces a 25518 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core. That places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41650. It sits within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-14700T (which scores 41914) and within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779). The Core 7 251TE is slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (41621) by 0.1% and the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41576) by 0.2%.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals. The 50th percentile ranking reflects the absence of measurement data, not a verified performance level. With 2 cores and 4 threads, it targets basic computing tasks: light office work, web browsing, and legacy software. Its 35 W TDP and lack of ECC support suggest a low-power, entry-level role.

For users who need multi-threaded throughput, the Core 7 251TE is the only option with recorded performance data. It outperforms the Processor 300T in every measured category, but the Processor 300T’s lack of scores means no direct head-to-head comparison is possible. The choice depends on workload: the Core 7 251TE for content creation, compilation, or virtualization; the Processor 300T for minimal power draw and basic duties.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 251TE | Intel Processor 300T |

|---------------|-------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 24 | 2 |

| Threads | 32 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 1.40 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | None listed |

| TDP | 45 W | 35 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Architecture | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) | Raptor Lake |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $384 | $82 |

| Part Number | SRQAXQ5ZG | SRN3K |

Both processors share the same L1 cache per core (80 KB) and L2 cache per core (1.25 MB). They also use the same socket (Intel Socket 1700), support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and feature PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 7 251TE’s 45 W TDP is higher than the Processor 300T’s 35 W, reflecting the additional cores and higher boost clock.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 7 251TE and the Intel Processor 300T. The Processor 300T has zero recorded scores across all test suites. As a result, the comparison relies on the Core 7 251TE’s standalone performance numbers versus the Processor 300T’s absence of data.

The Core 7 251TE’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25518 demonstrates its strength in rendering and CPU-intensive tasks. Its single-core score of 3602 in the same test shows a high boost clock efficiency. In Cinebench R20, it scores 10717 multi-core and 1512 single-core. Cinebench R15 results are 2572 multi-core and 362 single-core.

PassMark tests reveal a broad capability profile. The Core 7 251TE achieves 334399 in data compression, 22176 in data encryption, and 16974 in extended instructions. Integer math scores 125739, floating point math scores 85607, and find prime numbers scores 140. Multithread score is 30022, physics score is 1938, and random string sorting scores 39643. Single-thread performance is 3568 in both PassMark single-thread tests.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core 7 251TE’s average score of 41650 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (41621, +0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41576, +0.2%). It trails the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, -0.3%) and the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914, -0.6%). These deltas are minimal, placing the Core 7 251TE in a narrow performance band among high-end desktop and mobile processors.

The Processor 300T’s lack of benchmarks means no wins or losses can be assigned. The database records 0 wins for each processor in head-to-head tests. This absence of data prevents any quantitative comparison. The Processor 300T’s 2 cores and 3.40 GHz base clock suggest it can handle single-threaded tasks with reasonable efficiency, but without scores, that remains speculative.

The Core 7 251TE’s 88th percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its 36 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support high-throughput workloads. The Processor 300T’s 50th percentile is a placeholder value, not a measured outcome. Its 6 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provide basic memory performance, but the lack of ECC and lower core count restrict its appeal to entry-level builds.

In multi-threaded scenarios, the Core 7 251TE’s 24 cores and 32 threads deliver a 25518 Cinebench R23 score. The Processor 300T has no equivalent score. In single-threaded tests, the Core 7 251TE’s 3602 Cinebench R23 score benefits from the 5.40 GHz boost clock. The Processor 300T’s 3.40 GHz base clock, with no boost listed, cannot match that frequency headroom.

The Core 7 251TE’s 45 W TDP is higher than the Processor 300T’s 35 W, but the performance differential justifies the added power for demanding applications. The Processor 300T’s lower TDP and smaller die size (163 mm²) make it suitable for compact systems where heat and power are constrained. The Core 7 251TE’s 215 mm² die accommodates the additional cores and cache.

The database shows the Core 7 251TE as an active, desktop-class processor with a launch MSRP of $384. The Processor 300T is also active, desktop-class, with a launch MSRP of $82. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, limiting overclocking potential. The Core 7 251TE’s part number is SRQAXQ5ZG, while the Processor 300T’s is SRN3K.

For users relying on integrated graphics, the Core 7 251TE’s UHD Graphics 770 provides a higher-tier iGPU than the Processor 300T’s UHD Graphics 710. Both support DDR4 and DDR5, but the Core 7 251TE’s 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded advantage. The Processor 300T’s memory bandwidth remains unlisted.

In summary, the Intel Core 7 251TE is a high-core-count processor with verified benchmark dominance across all recorded tests. The Intel Processor 300T is an entry-level chip with no recorded performance data, making direct comparison impossible. The Core 7 251TE’s 88th percentile and average score of 41650 confirm its position among top-tier CPUs. The Processor 300T’s 50th percentile and zero average score leave its performance uncharacterized. The choice is straightforward for those who require multi-threaded power: the Core 7 251TE is the only option with data to support it.