Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i9-12900KF Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 7 251TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.4 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-12900KF

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 30 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,572
3,469
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
362
489
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,717
14,456
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,512
2,040
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
25,518
34,420
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,602
4,859
passmark_data_compression
334,399
537,785
passmark_data_encryption
22,176
29,502
passmark_extended_instructions
16,974
33,779
passmark_find_prime_numbers
140
142
passmark_floating_point_math
85,607
105,558
passmark_integer_math
125,739
138,932
passmark_multithread
30,022
40,970
passmark_physics
1,938
2,098
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,643
57,177
passmark_single_thread
3,568
4,144
passmark_singlethread
3,568
4,144
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
9,860
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
2,112
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
4,132
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
7,551
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
11,586
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,069
geekbench_multicore
N/A
18,113
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,361

Analysis: Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i9-12900KF

The Intel Core i9-12900KF and the Intel Core 7 251TE are both active desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they are built for different purposes. The benchmark data shows a clear and consistent performance hierarchy, with the i9-12900KF winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons. However, the Core 7 251TE counters with a much lower power envelope, a newer platform generation, and features like integrated graphics and ECC memory, making it a compelling choice for specific, efficiency-focused builds. The recorded data offers a straightforward split: raw performance versus platform efficiency and features.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-12900KF is the definitive winner in every single performance benchmark recorded. The database shows it has a 100% win rate (17 out of 17 tests) against the Core 7 251TE. This is the processor for users who prioritize maximum compute throughput, regardless of power draw. Its wins are most pronounced in multithreaded workloads, where its high core count and clock speeds translate to large advantages in rendering, encoding, and heavy simulation tasks. For example, in Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 34,420 versus 25,518, a 34.9% lead.

The Intel Core 7 251TE, while trailing in all raw performance metrics, wins on the efficiency and feature front. Its 45W TDP is a fraction of the i9-12900KF's 125W TDP, making it the clear choice for compact, thermally constrained, or always-on systems. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, a feature entirely absent from the i9-12900KF, which requires a discrete GPU for any display output. The 251TE also supports ECC memory, which is a crucial feature for a server or workstation environment where data integrity is paramount. Its lower launch MSRP also positions it as a more practical option for system builders not chasing maximum performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster for gaming?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900KF is faster in every recorded single-core test. It leads in Cinebench R23 single-core by 34.9% (4,859 vs 3,602) and in PassMark single-thread by 16.1% (4,144 vs 3,568). This indicates a significant advantage in games that rely on single-thread performance.

Q: Can I run the Intel Core 7 251TE without a dedicated graphics card?

A: Yes. The Core 7 251TE has integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i9-12900KF has no integrated graphics. This means the 251TE can output video from its motherboard ports, which is a major advantage for basic systems.

Q: Is the extra cost of the i9-12900KF justified for pure multi-threaded work?

A: The data suggests yes. The i9-12900KF is 34.9% ahead in Cinebench R23 multicore (34,420 vs 25,518) and 36.5% ahead in PassMark multithread (40,970 vs 30,022). This is a significant performance gap for rendering or compiling.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900KF has a launch MSRP of $564, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has a launch MSRP of $384. This difference is not discussed as a value proposition, but it is a factual point of comparison.

Q: Are these processors similar in power consumption?

A: No, they are very different. The i9-12900KF has a TDP of 125W, while the Core 7 251TE has a TDP of 45W. This makes the Core 7 far easier to cool and less demanding on a power supply.

Q: Which processor is better for a network attached storage (NAS) or home server?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE is the more suitable choice. Its 45W TDP is ideal for 24/7 operation, and it supports ECC memory for data reliability. The i9-12900KF does not support ECC memory and consumes much more power.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The results are unambiguous: the Intel Core i9-12900KF wins every single recorded benchmark. The largest margin of victory is in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 33,779 against the Core 7 251TE's 16,974, a massive 99% advantage. This suggests the i9-12900KF is vastly superior in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets like AVX-512.

The largest absolute score delta is in PassMark data compression: 537,785 for the i9-12900KF versus 334,399 for the Core 7, a 60.8% lead. This shows a major advantage in file archiving and data processing tasks. In the Cinebench suite, the i9-12900KF consistently beats the Core 7 by 34.9% across R15, R20, and R23, for both single-core and multicore tests. For instance, Cinebench R23 multi-core scores are 34,420 vs 25,518.

Even in lighter tests, the i9-129KF leads substantially. In PassMark floating point math, it wins by 23.3% (105,558 vs 85,607). The closest margin is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the i9-129KF wins by a narrow 1.4% (142 vs 140). The overall benchmark data shows a consistent and massive performance gap in favor of the i9-12900KF across all core counts and workload types.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core i9-12900KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. This is a key difference: the 251TE has more physical cores, but it loses in all tests due to much lower clock speeds. The i9-12900KF has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core 7 251TE has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The boost clock is slightly higher on the 251TE, but the base clock is drastically lower.

The TDP is a huge difference: the i9-12900KF is rated at 125W, while the Core 7 251TE is rated at just 45W. The i9-12900KF has a 30 MB shared L3 cache, while the Core 7 251TE has a 36 MB shared L3 cache. The 251TE is also the only one with a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The i9-12900KF uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Core 7 251TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The i9-12900KF has no integrated graphics, while the Core 7 251TE has UHD Graphics 770. The i9-12900KF does not support ECC memory, while the Core 7 251TE does. Finally, the i9-12900KF has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 7 251TE is locked.

Architecture Differences

The two chips represent different architectural periods for Intel. The Intel Core i9-12900KF is based on the Alder Lake-S architecture, which is the 12th generation of Intel's Core family. The Intel Core 7 251TE is based on the Bartlett Lake architecture, which is a newer release. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, and both have a die size of 215 mm².

The core layout is a key difference. The i9-12900KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, which implies a hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores. The Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, suggesting a different core layout design. Both have the same L1 cache (80 KB per core) and L2 cache (1.25 MB per core), but the Core 7 251TE has a larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB). The 251TE also has a newer memory bus, supporting DDR4 and DDR5, and a listed memory bandwidth, while the i9-12900KF does not have a listed memory bandwidth. The presence of ECC support and integrated graphics on the 251TE further highlights its different target segment.

The Verdict

The data is clear: the Intel Core i9-12900KF is the overwhelming performance champion. It wins every benchmark in the database, often by large margins. If your priority is maximum processing power, especially for multi-threaded tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or heavy scientific computing, the i9-12900KF is the only logical choice. Its 34.9% advantage in Cinebench R23 multicore is a massive performance gap that will save you considerable time in these tasks. The unlocked multiplier also offers headroom for users who want to push it further.

The Intel Core 7 251TE, however, is not a poor choice; it is a different one. Its 45W TDP, integrated graphics, and ECC support make it the clear choice for a different class of system. For a silent home server, a low-power firewall, a compact workstation, or any system that runs 24/7, the Core 7 251TE is the more practical and suitable option. It offers a very different set of features, such as a newer PCIe Gen 5 interface and a higher boost clock, but its performance is simply not in the same class. In summary, the i9-12900KF is for the user who needs speed, while the Core 7 251TE is for the user who needs sustained, reliable, and feature-rich operation at low power.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 251TE
i9-12900KF
Core Specs
Cores
24
16 -33.3%
Threads
32
24 -25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.4
3.2 +128.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.2 -3.7%
Frequency (GHz)
1.4
3.2 +128.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.4
5.2 -3.7%
Multiplier
14
32 +128.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
36 MB (shared)
30 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
125 +177.8%
PL1
45 W
241W
PL2
135 W
241W
Architecture
Architecture
Alder Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Alder Lake-S
Generation
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z690, H670, B660, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 16
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1000 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
1800 MHz up to 3.8 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
$564
Part Number
SRQAXQ5ZG
SRL4J
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 7 251TE Details View Core i9-12900KF Details