Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a decisive sweep. Across all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the Intel Core i7-14700F outperforms the Intel Core 7 251TE. The margin is consistent and substantial, with the smallest single-core gap still favoring the i7-14700F by 16.2%. The largest deficit for the Core 7 251TE appears in PassMark extended instructions, where the i7-14700F leads by 40.6%. This pattern indicates a fundamental performance separation rather than workload-specific variability.

In Cinebench tests, the i7-14700F delivers uniformly stronger results. The multicore scores in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 all show the same approximate 27.3% advantage. The single-core variants follow closely, with the i7-14700F leading by 27.5% in R15 and 27.3% in both R20 and R23. The consistency of these deltas across different Cinebench versions suggests that the performance gap is stable regardless of the rendering workload's specific demands.

PassMark results reinforce the same hierarchy. The data compression test shows the i7-14700F scoring 505885 against 334399, a 33.9% difference. Data encryption favors the i7-14700F by 26.4% (30144 vs 22176). Floating-point math shows a 20% gap (107005 vs 85607), while integer math narrows slightly to 19.3% (155808 vs 125739). The PassMark multithread score follows the Cinebench pattern at 27.3% ahead (41317 vs 30022). Even the smallest head-to-head delta, the 16.2% single-thread advantage (4257 vs 3568), leaves no ambiguity about which processor holds the performance lead.

The Core 7 251TE does not win a single recorded comparison. Its winsA count is 0, while the i7-14700F holds 17 wins. The average benchmark score places the i7-14700F at 53620, compared to 41650 for the Core 7 251TE, a difference of roughly 28.7% based on those averages. The percentile rankings also separate the two: the i7-14700F sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 251TE sits at the 88th.

Where Each One Wins

The data indicates that the Intel Core i7-14700F wins in every measured category. There is no benchmark category, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded, where the Core 7 251TE records a higher score. The i7-14700F's advantages span CPU-intensive rendering, mathematical workloads, compression, encryption, and physics simulation.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the i7-14700F is the clear choice based on the recorded numbers. The 27.3% multicore advantage in Cinebench R23 translates directly to faster rendering times in CPU-bound applications. The 33.9% lead in data compression and 26.4% lead in encryption indicate that file archiving and cryptographic workloads also benefit substantially.

The Core 7 251TE, despite its higher core and thread counts (24 cores and 32 threads versus 20 cores and 28 threads), does not translate that configuration into benchmark wins. The data shows that the i7-14700F's architecture and clock characteristics deliver higher scores across the board. The single-thread gap of 16.2% in PassMark and 27.3% in Cinebench R23 suggests that the i7-14700F's higher base clock (2.10 GHz vs 1.40 GHz) contributes meaningfully to its performance advantage, even though both processors share the same 5.40 GHz boost clock.

The only recorded area where the Core 7 251TE shows any relative strength is in the narrowness of the gap. Its 19.3% deficit in integer math and 20% deficit in floating-point math are the smallest multicore deltas, while the 40.6% gap in extended instructions is the largest. This suggests that the Core 7 251TE's additional cores help somewhat in integer-heavy workloads but fall significantly behind in specialized instruction throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has an average score of 41650.

Q: How large is the Cinebench R23 multicore performance gap?

A: The i7-14700F scores 35122 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Core 7 251TE scores 25518. The i7-14700F leads by 27.3%.

Q: Does the Core 7 251TE win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the Core 7 251TE with 0 wins and the i7-14700F with 17 wins across all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference in PassMark?

A: The i7-14700F scores 4257 in PassMark single-thread, compared to 3568 for the Core 7 251TE. The i7-14700F leads by 16.2%.

Q: How do the two processors compare in percentile ranking?

A: The i7-14700F ranks at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 251TE ranks at the 88th percentile.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Despite the Core 7 251TE's higher counts, the i7-14700F wins all recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The base clock differs substantially: the Core 7 251TE runs at 1.40 GHz, while the i7-14700F runs at 2.10 GHz. Both share the same 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Thermal design power differs, with the Core 7 251TE rated at 45 watts and the i7-14700F at 65 watts. Both use the Intel Socket 1700. The Core 7 251TE's die size is 215 mm², while the i7-14700F's is 257 mm². L2 cache differs per core: 1.25 MB for the Core 7 251TE versus 2 MB for the i7-14700F. L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the Core 7 251TE and 33 MB shared on the i7-14700F.

Memory bandwidth is listed as 89.6 GB/s for the Core 7 251TE, while no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the i7-14700F. The Core 7 251TE includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics (N/A). Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses, and both support ECC memory. Both use Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The release dates differ: the Core 7 251TE was released on 2025-01-12, while the i7-14700F was released on 2024-01-07. The part numbers also differ (SRQAXQ5ZG versus SRN3Z). The launch MSRP is $384 for the Core 7 251TE and $359 for the i7-14700F. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation, with the architecture listed as Raptor Lake. The Core 7 251TE has no architecture field specified, while the i7-14700F explicitly lists Raptor Lake.

Both processors are manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. The Core 7 251TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the i7-14700F has a larger die at 257 mm². L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both. The L2 cache allocation differs, with the Core 7 251TE providing 1.25 MB per core and the i7-14700F providing 2 MB per core. The shared L3 cache is 36 MB on the Core 7 251TE and 33 MB on the i7-14700F.

The integrated graphics presence is a notable architectural difference. The Core 7 251TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i7-14700F lists no integrated graphics. This means the Core 7 251TE can handle display output without a discrete GPU, while the i7-14700F requires a separate graphics card. The Core 7 251TE also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i7-14700F has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, a feature that distinguishes them from many consumer desktop chips.

The Core 7 251TE's higher core count of 24 versus 20, combined with its lower 45-watt TDP, indicates a design oriented toward efficiency with many cores. The i7-14700F's higher 65-watt TDP and higher base clock of 2.10 GHz suggest a more aggressive power envelope that contributes to its benchmark dominance. The identical 5.40 GHz boost clock on both processors means the i7-14700F reaches that frequency from a higher base point, which likely explains its consistent single-thread advantages.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear hierarchy. The Intel Core i7-14700F wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons, with advantages ranging from 16.2% in PassMark single-thread to 40.6% in PassMark extended instructions. Its average benchmark score of 53620 exceeds the Core 7 251TE's 41650 by a substantial margin, and its 91st percentile ranking places it above the Core 7 251TE's 88th percentile.

Users focused on maximum compute performance should choose the i7-14700F based on the recorded data. It delivers superior results in every measured workload, including rendering, compression, encryption, and math operations. The 27.3% multicore advantage in Cinebench R23 and the 33.9% lead in data compression are decisive for CPU-intensive tasks.

The Core 7 251TE does offer certain configuration advantages that the benchmarks do not capture. Its 24 cores and 32 threads exceed the i7-14700F's 20 cores and 28 threads. Its 45-watt TDP is lower than the i7-14700F's 65 watts, indicating lower power draw. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which the i7-14700F lacks, and it supports ECC memory just like the i7-14700F. For systems requiring integrated display output or lower power consumption, the Core 7 251TE holds appeal despite its benchmark deficits.

However, the performance data does not support selecting the Core 7 251TE on compute grounds. The i7-14700F's higher base clock and architectural efficiency overcome the Core 7 251TE's core-count advantage in every recorded test. The i7-14700F's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at a 0.6% delta and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 0.8%, while the Core 7 251TE's closest competitors include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at 0.1% and the Intel Core i7-14700T at -0.6%. These rival comparisons reinforce that the i7-14700F competes in a higher performance tier.

The choice depends on priorities. For raw performance, the i7-14700F is the only option supported by the data. For efficiency, integrated graphics, and a higher core count in a lower-TDP package, the Core 7 251TE offers those features, but users must accept a performance gap that reaches 40.6% in some workloads. The recorded benchmarks deliver a straightforward verdict: the i7-14700F is the stronger processor in every measured category.