Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the Intel Core 7 251TE and the Intel Core i5-110?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This is a substantial difference in parallel processing capacity, with the Core 7 251TE offering four times the core count and nearly three times the thread count.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 reaches 4.30 GHz. The Core 7 251TE also has a lower base clock of 1.40 GHz compared to the Core i5-110's 2.90 GHz, reflecting different design priorities.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-110 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no recorded benchmark entries, and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 7 251TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-110 does not. This makes the Core 7 251TE more suitable for reliability-sensitive workloads.

Q: What are the socket requirements for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200. These sockets are not interchangeable, meaning motherboard compatibility differs entirely between the two.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 251TE and the Intel Core i5-110 come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The Core 7 251TE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename using a 10 nm process node, while the Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node. The process node difference is significant: the 10 nm node enables higher transistor density and better power efficiency compared to the older 14 nm node.

The core configuration diverges sharply. The Core 7 251TE packs 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration designed for heavily parallel workloads. The Core i5-110 offers 6 cores and 12 threads, a more modest setup suited to mainstream desktop tasks. The thread-to-core ratio also differs: the Core 7 251TE has 32 threads across 24 cores, indicating some cores share threads, while the Core i5-110 has 12 threads across 6 cores, a standard two-threads-per-core arrangement.

Cache hierarchies reflect the generational gap. The Core 7 251TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The Core i5-110 has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The L3 cache advantage for the Core 7 251TE is threefold in total capacity, which benefits workloads with large working sets.

Memory support differs by generation. The Core 7 251TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core i5-110 supports only DDR4, also dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The Core 7 251TE's bandwidth is roughly double that of the Core i5-110, a direct consequence of newer memory controller support.

PCIe capabilities also separate the two. The Core 7 251TE provides Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i5-110 provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). PCIe Gen 5 offers substantially higher transfer rates for compatible devices such as GPUs and NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 251TE ships with UHD Graphics 770, while the Core i5-110 uses UHD Graphics 630. Both are integrated solutions, but the newer UHD 770 architecture delivers improved media and display capabilities.

Process node, die size, and packaging also differ. The Core 7 251TE has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core i5-110 has no recorded die size in the database. Both are produced by Intel, but the manufacturing process is different (10 nm versus 14 nm). The release dates show the Core 7 251TE launched in January 2025, while the Core i5-110 launched in September 2025.

The production status for both is listed as active. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not officially supported. The Core 7 251TE supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core i5-110, which is relevant for workstation and server-style reliability requirements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data between these two processors is limited because the Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Core 7 251TE, by contrast, has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results.

The Core 7 251TE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25518 and a single-core score of 3602. In Cinebench R20, it scores 10717 multi-core and 1512 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2572 and the single-core score is 362. These results show strong scaling from single-core to multi-core workloads, consistent with the 24-core configuration.

PassMark results for the Core 7 251TE cover a range of specific workloads. The multithread score is 30022, with a single-thread score of 3568. Data compression scores 334399, data encryption scores 22176, and extended instructions score 16974. Floating point math reaches 85607, integer math reaches 125739, and finding prime numbers scores 140. Random string sorting scores 39643, and physics scores 1938.

Without any benchmark scores for the Core i5-110, direct numerical comparison is impossible. The database records an average benchmark score of 0 for the Core i5-110, and the nearest rivals field is empty for that chip. The Core 7 251TE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 41650 and sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals for the Core 7 251TE provide context for its performance tier. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41621, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41914, 0.6% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating the Core 7 251TE sits in a tightly competitive performance band.

The absence of data for the Core i5-110 is notable. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits at the median of all CPUs, but with no recorded scores, the database cannot confirm any specific workload behavior. The Core 7 251TE's 88th percentile ranking, paired with its extensive benchmark results, places it clearly above the median in overall performance.

The wins counters in the head-to-head comparison show zero wins for both processors, reflecting the lack of paired benchmark data. Any conclusion about relative performance must therefore rely on the architectural differences and the Core 7 251TE's absolute scores.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 7 251TE, with 24 cores, 32 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, 36 MB of L3 cache, DDR5 support, and an 88th percentile ranking, is positioned for demanding multi-threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 41650 and complete set of Cinebench and PassMark results confirm it operates in a competitive tier alongside processors like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and the Intel Core i7-14650HX, all within 0.6% of each other.

The Intel Core i5-110, with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, 12 MB of L3 cache, DDR4-only support, and a 50th percentile ranking, is a more modest desktop processor. With no recorded benchmark scores in the database, its performance characteristics cannot be quantified from the available data.

For users choosing between these two, the decision hinges on workload requirements. The Core 7 251TE is the choice for multi-threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, where 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallel throughput. Its ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity further align it with professional and workstation use cases.

The Core i5-110 is suited to standard desktop tasks where thread counts above 12 are rarely utilized. Its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz provides responsive single-thread performance for everyday applications, and its lower core count means it draws less power under typical loads, though the database does not provide wattage figures to quantify this.

The Core 7 251TE also offers superior memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s, a doubled L3 cache capacity, and support for newer DDR5 memory modules. These factors compound its architectural advantages in memory-intensive workloads.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. Both are desktop market segments with active production status. The Core 7 251TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200, meaning platform choice is dictated by socket compatibility.

The benchmark database shows a significant gap in recorded performance evidence. The Core 7 251TE has extensive results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark subtests. The Core i5-110 has none. This disparity limits direct comparison but also signals that the Core i5-110 has not been validated in the same workload suite.

The 88th versus 50th percentile ranking difference is substantial. The Core 7 251TE outperforms the median CPU by a wide margin, while the Core i5-110 sits exactly at the median. Without benchmark scores for the Core i5-110, the exact magnitude of the performance gap cannot be stated, but the architectural differences and percentile data point to a large advantage for the Core 7 251TE.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

Cores: 24 (Core 7 251TE) versus 6 (Core i5-110).

Threads: 32 versus 12.

Base clock: 1.40 GHz versus 2.90 GHz.

Boost clock: 5.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz.

TDP: 45 versus 65.

Socket: Intel Socket 1700 versus Intel Socket 1200.

Codename: Bartlett Lake versus Comet Lake.

Generation: Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i5 (Comet Lake).

Process node: 10 nm versus 14 nm.

Die size: 215 mm² versus no recorded data.

L1 cache: 80 KB per core versus 64 KB per core.

L2 cache: 1.25 MB per core versus 256 KB per core.

L3 cache: 36 MB shared versus 12 MB shared.

Memory support: DDR4 and DDR5 versus DDR4 only.

Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s.

ECC memory: supported versus not supported.

PCIe: Gen 5, 16 lanes versus Gen 3, 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 versus UHD Graphics 630.

Release date: 2025-01-12 versus 2025-09-10.

Launch MSRP: $384 versus $200.

Part number: SRQAXQ5ZG versus SA35X.

Average benchmark score: 41650 versus 0.

Percentile vs all CPUs: 88 versus 50.

Nearest rivals: four listed versus none.