Intel Core 7 251E vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E boosts to 5.60 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-14100T boosts to 4.40 GHz. The base clocks are 2.10 GHz and 2.70 GHz, respectively.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core i3-14100T has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics are included?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core i3-14100T uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core i3-14100T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 7 251E and the Intel Core i3-14100T support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The data in the database places these two processors in different performance tiers, despite both being desktop parts on the same socket. The Intel Core 7 251E, with 24 cores and a 5.60 GHz boost, is positioned for heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel Core i3-14100T, with 4 cores and a 4.40 GHz boost, targets lighter tasks. The recorded benchmark results for the Core i3-14100T show a multicore score of 11,612 in Cinebench R23, a single-core score of 1,639, and a PassMark multithread score of 13,662. The Core 7 251E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so a direct numerical comparison is not possible from the available data.

For users with workloads that scale across many cores, such as rendering, compilation, or scientific simulations, the 24-core layout of the Core 7 251E is the clear selection based on core count and cache capacity. For users prioritizing low power consumption and adequate single-threaded performance for everyday tasks, the Core i3-14100T, with its 35-watt TDP and 71st-percentile ranking among all CPUs, is the more efficient choice. The Core i3-14100T's nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i3-13100F and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE, show average scores within 0.3% of its own, confirming that it sits in a competitive mid-range bracket. The Core 7 251E, with a 50th-percentile ranking, does not have recorded rivals or scores, leaving its exact standing unspecified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The only recorded benchmark suite belongs to the Intel Core i3-14100T, which includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 results, plus several PassMark tests. The Core i3-14100T achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,612 and a single-core score of 1,639. Its Cinebench R20 results are 4,877 (multicore) and 688 (single-core), while R15 scores are 1,170 (multicore) and 165 (single-core). In PassMark tests, the Core i3-14100T posts 13,662 for multithread, 3,498 for single-thread, 40,292 for integer math, 31,379 for floating-point math, 15,579 for random string sorting, 152,636 for data compression, 7,881 for data encryption, and 10,414 for extended instructions.

Because the Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison relies on specifications rather than measured performance. The Core 7 251E offers 6 times the core count and 4 times the thread count of the Core i3-14100T, along with a 3 times larger L3 cache (36 MB versus 12 MB). Its boost clock is 1.20 GHz higher. These specification gaps suggest a substantial advantage for the Core 7 251E in multi-threaded tasks, but the absence of recorded scores prevents a precise delta. The Core i3-14100T, conversely, has a higher base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.10 GHz), which may benefit lightly threaded workloads that rely on sustained base frequency.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several specifications: both use Intel Socket 1700, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both run dual-channel memory buses, both support ECC memory, both use Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only), and both are desktop market segments with active production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The key differences are as follows. The Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads, versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the Core i3-14100T. The base clock is 2.10 GHz for the 251E and 2.70 GHz for the 14100T. The boost clock is 5.60 GHz for the 251E and 4.40 GHz for the 14100T. The TDP is 65 watts for the 251E and 35 watts for the 14100T. The L2 cache is 2 MB per core for the 251E and 1.25 MB per core for the 14100T. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared for the 251E and 12 MB shared for the 14100T. The die size is 257 mm² for the 251E and 163 mm² for the 14100T. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the 251E and UHD Graphics 730 for the 14100T. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the 251E, while the 14100T has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The release dates differ: the 251E was released on 2025-01-12, and the 14100T was released on 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP is $384 for the 251E and $134 for the 14100T.

Architecture Differences

The Core 7 251E belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation, with a codename of Bartlett Lake. The Core i3-14100T belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, with an architecture of Raptor Lake and a codename of Raptor Lake-R. Both are fabricated on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The Core 7 251E has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core i3-14100T has a die size of 163 mm². The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both. The L2 cache differs, with the 251E providing 2 MB per core and the 14100T providing 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the 251E and 12 MB shared on the 14100T. The part numbers are SRQDUQ657 for the 251E and SRMX0 for the 14100T. Both processors include integrated graphics, but the 251E uses the UHD Graphics 770, while the 14100T uses the UHD Graphics 730. The architecture difference between Bartlett Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh indicates a generational split, with the 251E being a newer release (2025-01-12 versus 2024-01-07).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251E wins on raw core count, thread count, boost clock, L2 and L3 cache sizes, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics tier. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration is suited for parallel workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and multi-threaded server-style applications. The 5.60 GHz boost clock provides high single-thread headroom when needed. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data across many cores. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-throughput data movement. The UHD Graphics 770 offers a higher tier of integrated graphics compared to the UHD Graphics 730.

The Intel Core i3-14100T wins on power efficiency, with a 35-watt TDP compared to 65 watts for the 251E. It also has a higher base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.10 GHz), which can benefit sustained lightly threaded tasks that do not boost. Its smaller die size (163 mm² versus 257 mm²) indicates a more compact implementation. The recorded benchmark data shows the 14100T performs competitively against its nearest rivals: it matches the Intel Core i3-13100F (delta 0%), matches the Intel Core i7-1255U (delta 0%), is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE, and is 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 9374F. Its 71st-percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates strong relative standing for a low-power part. The 14100T is the choice for systems where thermal and power constraints are primary, such as compact desktops or always-on servers with moderate loads. The 251E is the choice for systems where maximum core throughput is the priority, with all specification data pointing to a large multi-threaded advantage, though no measured scores exist to quantify it.