Intel Core 7 251E vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison
Intel Core 7 251E
Core 7 251TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 251E vs Intel Core 7 251TE
Where Each One Wins
The database contains recorded benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 251TE, while the Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries in the current dataset. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison. The 251TE delivers measurable performance across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark suites, while the 251E remains uncharacterized by recorded measurements.
The 251TE shows strength in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25518 positions it as a capable desktop processor for heavily parallel tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 30022 reinforces this pattern. Single-thread performance is comparatively more modest, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3602 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3568.
Data encryption and compression workloads reveal another strength. The 251TE scores 22176 in Passmark data encryption and 334399 in Passmark data compression. These results suggest efficient handling of memory-intensive and cryptographic operations. Integer math at 125739 and floating-point math at 85607 round out the computational profile.
The 251E, lacking benchmark data, cannot be assigned wins in any category. Its specifications, however, indicate higher clock ceilings. With a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, the 251E appears designed for higher sustained and peak frequencies. The 251TE counters with efficiency characteristics, operating at a 45 W TDP compared to the 251E's 65 W TDP.
The percentile ranking favors the 251TE. It sits at the 88th percentile against all CPUs, while the 251E rests at the 50th percentile. This gap suggests that, based on available data, the 251TE outperforms a larger share of the processor market than the 251E does.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Bartlett Lake codename and belong to the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. Intel manufactures both on a 10 nm process node. The core and thread counts match exactly: 24 cores and 32 threads. This identical configuration means differences arise from clock behavior, cache allocation, and physical design.
The 251E carries a die size of 257 mm², while the 251TE uses a smaller 215 mm² die. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The smaller die on the 251TE does not reduce core count, which points to differences in cache distribution or other internal structures.
L2 cache differs between the two. The 251E allocates 2 MB per core, while the 251TE allocates 1.25 MB per core. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and L3 cache matches at 36 MB shared. The total L3 allocation remains consistent across both parts.
Clock frequencies define the operational gap. The 251E starts at 2.10 GHz base and reaches 5.60 GHz boost. The 251TE starts lower at 1.40 GHz base and tops out at 5.40 GHz boost. A lower base clock on the 251TE correlates with its reduced 45 W TDP, while the 251E's 65 W TDP supports its higher base frequency.
Memory architecture shows no differences. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present on both. PCIe connectivity matches at Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are identical: UHD Graphics 770.
Both processors launched on the same date in January 2025 and carry the same launch MSRP of $384. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. Production status for both is listed as Active.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Direct head-to-head benchmark entries are absent from the database, so a test-by-test comparison cannot be constructed from recorded results. The available data instead consists of the 251TE's absolute scores and the 251E's absence of scores.
The 251TE's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25518 places it well ahead of typical mid-range desktop parts. Its R20 multicore score of 10717 and R15 multicore score of 2572 show consistent scaling across Cinebench revisions. Single-core results follow a similar pattern: 3602 in R23, 1512 in R20, and 362 in R15.
Passmark results for the 251TE show particular strength in data compression at 334399 and random string sorting at 39643. Prime number finding scores 140, which is a lower absolute number but reflects the nature of that workload. Extended instructions score 16974, and physics simulation scores 1938.
The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the 251TE's standing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41621, a delta of 0.1% from the 251TE's average benchmark score of 41650. The Intel Core i7-14650HX sits at 41576, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779, putting it 0.3% behind the 251TE. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41914, trailing by 0.6%. These narrow margins indicate the 251TE operates in a tightly contested performance band.
Without benchmark entries for the 251E, the database cannot confirm whether its higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz translates into superior single-thread performance. The 251TE's boost clock of 5.40 GHz is close enough that any advantage would likely be small, but no recorded measurement supports that inference.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several specification fields while sharing many others. The table below isolates only the differing fields.
| Specification | Intel Core 7 251E | Intel Core 7 251TE |
|---|---|---|
| Base clock | 2.10 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.60 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |
| Die size | 257 mm² | 215 mm² |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Part number | SRQDUQ657 | SRQAXQ5ZG |
All other recorded specifications match: 24 cores, 32 threads, 10 nm process, Intel Socket 1700, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, ECC support, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, UHD Graphics 770, desktop market segment, active production status, January 2025 release date, $384 launch MSRP, and locked multiplier.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 7 251E reaches 5.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 251TE tops out at 5.40 GHz.
Q: Do both processors have the same core count?
A: Yes, both have 24 cores and 32 threads.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?
A: The 251E has a 65 W TDP, while the 251TE uses a 45 W TDP.
Q: Which processor has a larger L2 cache?
A: The 251E allocates 2 MB per core, while the 251TE allocates 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache is identical at 36 MB shared.
Q: How does the 251TE compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The 251TE's average benchmark score of 41650 is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14650HX, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-12850HX, and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-14700T.
Q: Is the 251E's die size larger or smaller than the 251TE's?
A: The 251E measures 257 mm², which is larger than the 251TE's 215 mm².
The Verdict
The recorded data favors the Intel Core 7 251TE for users who prioritize measured performance and efficiency. Its 88th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 41650 demonstrate solid standing against the broader processor market. The 45 W TDP makes it the more power-conscious choice between the two, and its benchmark scores confirm that this efficiency does not come at the cost of competitive performance.
The Intel Core 7 251E offers higher base and boost clocks, a larger L2 cache per core, and a larger die. These specifications suggest potential for higher peak performance, particularly in lightly threaded workloads where the 5.60 GHz boost clock could provide an edge. However, the absence of benchmark data for the 251E means the database cannot verify this potential.
The 251TE's nearest rival comparisons show a tightly clustered competitive field. Deltas of 0.1% to 0.6% against the Core Ultra 7 265H, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-12850HX, and Core i7-14700T indicate that the 251TE performs within a narrow band of comparable desktop and mobile processors. No similar positioning data exists for the 251E.
For workloads that demand multi-threaded throughput, the 251TE's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25518 and Passmark multithread score of 30022 provide concrete evidence of capability. The 251E, with its 65 W TDP and higher clocks, might appeal to scenarios requiring maximum frequency, but the data does not quantify that advantage.
The shared platform features, including DDR4 and DDR5 support, dual-channel memory at 89.6 GB/s, ECC capability, and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, mean the choice between these processors does not hinge on memory or expansion options. Both use UHD Graphics 770 and fit the Intel Socket 1700.
Buyers who require verified performance should select the 251TE, as it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores. Buyers who prioritize the highest possible clock speeds and larger per-core cache should consider the 251E, with the understanding that its performance remains unmeasured in the database. The identical launch MSRP of $384 and matching release date simplify the decision to these performance and efficiency trade-offs.