Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: Both the Intel Core 7 240H and the Intel Core i7-14701TE share a maximum boost clock of 5.20 GHz, so neither has an advantage in peak single-core frequency.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE scores 17035, which is 7.5% ahead of the Intel Core 7 240H’s 15764. This is one of the few tests where the desktop chip wins.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 24 MB. The desktop part holds a 9 MB advantage in total L3 capacity.

Q: What socket does each processor use?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744, which is a mobile platform socket. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform socket.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 240H does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher overall benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE is at the 78th percentile. The mobile chip ranks slightly higher overall.

The Verdict

The recorded data splits these two processors cleanly by workload type. The Intel Core 7 240H wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and its average benchmark score of 31483 is 21% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 26013. The mobile chip also holds the higher percentile ranking at 82 versus 78. For tasks that rely on broad multi-threaded throughput, data compression, encryption, and integer math, the Intel Core 7 240H is the stronger pick.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE, however, wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, PassMark prime number finding, and PassMark physics. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2405 is 28.5% ahead of the Intel Core 7 240H’s 1719. This desktop chip also offers ECC memory support, a larger 33 MB L3 cache, and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes versus 8 on the mobile part. Builders who need ECC, more PCIe connectivity, or better raw single-thread rendering performance should favor the Intel Core i7-14701TE.

The Intel Core 7 240H is the better all-around performer in the database’s measurements, especially for compression, encryption, and general multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the better choice for specific desktop-oriented tasks where its larger cache, ECC capability, and superior single-core rendering scores matter more.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the Intel Core 7 240H appears in PassMark single-thread testing, where it scores 3782 versus 2637 for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, a 43.4% advantage. Cinebench R15 multi-core also favors the mobile chip heavily: 2360 versus 1716, a 37.5% lead. Data encryption shows a 29.5% gap (15155 versus 11699), and random string sorting delivers a 26.8% edge (28866 versus 22760). Integer math follows at 22.2% (80396 versus 65792), and data compression at 23.2% (271774 versus 220520). The Intel Core 7 240H also wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 19.7% (8562 versus 7154), PassMark multi-thread by 19.6% (23975 versus 20042), Cinebench R20 single-core by 19.6% (1208 versus 1010), floating point math by 17.3% (58905 versus 50219), and extended instructions by 17.7% (16897 versus 14354). The smaller single-core win in Cinebench R15 is 2.9% (249 versus 242).

The Intel Core i7-14701TE has its own notable victories. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2405 beats 1719 by 28.5%, the largest margin in its favor. PassMark find prime numbers shows a 28.7% advantage (143 versus 102). Cinebench R23 multi-core goes to the desktop chip by 7.5% (17035 versus 15764), and PassMark physics by 7.4% (1860 versus 1723). These four wins are concentrated in prime number calculation, physics simulation, and the newer Cinebench R23 workload.

The overall win tally is 13 for the Intel Core 7 240H and 4 for the Intel Core i7-14701TE. The mobile processor dominates the PassMark suite, while the desktop processor takes the more specialized workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count. The Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8. Both have 16 threads, so the mobile chip’s extra cores do not add threads. Base clocks also differ: 2.50 GHz for the Intel Core 7 240H versus 2.10 GHz for the Intel Core i7-14701TE. Boost clocks are identical at 5.20 GHz. Both processors have a 45 W TDP.

The socket is a major differentiator. The Intel Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744, a mobile socket, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The die size of the desktop chip is 257 mm², while the mobile chip’s die size is not recorded. PCIe lane counts differ: the Intel Core 7 240H provides 8 CPU PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the Intel Core i7-14701TE provides 16.

Memory support is identical in type (DDR4 and DDR5) and bus configuration (dual-channel). ECC support splits the pair: the Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC, the Intel Core 7 240H does not. Integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, and the Intel Core i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core 7 240H has a recorded launch MSRP of $502, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has no recorded launch MSRP. Both are active production parts and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same Raptor Lake architecture and codename family, with the Intel Core 7 240H using Raptor Lake-H and the Intel Core i7-14701TE using Raptor Lake-R. Both are built on the same 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry. The generation labels differ: the Intel Core 7 240H is listed as Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh), and the Intel Core i7-14701TE is listed as Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The mobile part belongs to the Core 7 series, while the desktop part belongs to the Core 14th Gen series.

Cache layouts show both similarities and differences. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and L2 cache is identical at 2 MB per core. The shared L3 cache differs: 24 MB on the Intel Core 7 240H versus 33 MB on the Intel Core i7-14701TE. This 9 MB L3 advantage is a structural difference that helps the desktop chip in certain cache-sensitive workloads.

The market segment is a fundamental architectural split. The Intel Core 7 240H is a mobile processor designed for laptops, and the Intel Core i7-14701TE is a desktop processor. This is reflected in the socket, PCIe lane count, and integrated graphics choice. The mobile chip uses a compact BGA package with 8 PCIe lanes, while the desktop chip uses LGA 1700 with 16 PCIe lanes. The integrated graphics units also differ by design: Iris Xe Graphics 64EU on the mobile part versus UHD Graphics 770 on the desktop part.

Release dates differ by several months. The Intel Core 7 240H launched on 2024-12-17, and the Intel Core i7-14701TE launched on 2024-06-30. The desktop part predates the mobile part by about half a year. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 240H wins in the majority of measured workloads. Its 43.4% lead in PassMark single-thread testing is the standout result, indicating strong per-thread performance in that benchmark. It also dominates data compression (23.2% ahead), data encryption (29.5% ahead), and integer math (22.2% ahead). These results point to strong all-round throughput for general computing, file archiving, and cryptographic operations. The mobile chip also leads in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core, plus PassMark multi-thread, floating point math, extended instructions, and random string sorting. For users running mixed workloads, compressing files, encrypting data, or doing heavy integer calculations, the Intel Core 7 240H is the faster part.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core by 7.5% and Cinebench R23 single-core by 28.5%. Its prime number finding result is 28.7% higher, and its physics score is 7.4% higher. These wins cluster in rendering workloads from the newer Cinebench version, prime number calculations, and physics simulation. The desktop chip’s larger 33 MB L3 cache likely contributes to these results. ECC memory support is another advantage for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, making it suitable for error-sensitive computing environments. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide more expansion bandwidth than the 8 lanes on the mobile part.

In practical terms, the Intel Core 7 240H is the better choice for users who prioritize the PassMark suite, data compression, encryption, and general math throughput. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the better choice for users running Cinebench R23 workloads, physics simulations, prime number searches, or who require ECC memory and more PCIe connectivity. The two processors serve different platform needs: one is a mobile chip for laptops, the other is a desktop chip for Socket 1700 motherboards. The benchmark data shows the mobile chip as the overall performer, while the desktop chip holds distinct advantages in specific workloads and platform features.