Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison between the Intel Core 7 240H and the Intel Core i7-14701E is decisively lopsided. The desktop-oriented i7-14701E claims 15 of the 17 recorded test victories, while the mobile Core 7 240H manages only 2 wins. The overall average benchmark scores reflect this gap, with the i7-14701E posting 33206 against 31483 for the Core 7 240H.

The single largest margin comes in Cinebench R23 single-core testing, where the i7-14701E scores 3133 versus 1719 for the Core 7 240H, a 45.1% advantage. This is the clearest indicator of the desktop chip's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to 5.20 GHz. The same test in multi-core mode shows a 29% lead for the i7-14701E (22195 vs 15764), demonstrating that the desktop part's performance advantage is not limited to lightly threaded workloads.

Cinebench R15 tells a different story in multi-core, where the Core 7 240H wins 2360 to 2237, a 5.5% margin. However, this is the only multi-core test the mobile chip wins. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the i7-14701E reverses the result with an 8.1% lead (9321 vs 8562). The pattern suggests the Core 7 240H's 10-core configuration can compete in certain older rendering workloads but falls behind in newer, more demanding tests.

PassMark results reinforce the i7-14701E's dominance. The desktop chip wins integer math by a narrow 1.1% (81325 vs 80396) and floating point math by 4.8% (61873 vs 58905). Data compression shows a 3.9% edge for the i7-14701E (282939 vs 271774), while extended instructions favor the desktop part by 8.8% (18528 vs 16897). The i7-14701E also leads in find prime numbers by 42% (176 vs 102) and physics by 28.2% (2399 vs 1723).

The Core 7 240H's two victories are data encryption (15155 vs 14862, a 2% edge) and the aforementioned Cinebench R15 multi-core result. Both wins are modest in magnitude. In single-thread PassMark, the i7-14701E leads by 12.1% (4305 vs 3782), and multithread PassMark shows an 8.2% gap (26112 vs 23975). Random string sorting is nearly even, with the i7-14701E ahead by just 1% (29158 vs 28866).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E is the stronger performer across virtually every benchmark category. Its wins span rendering workloads, math operations, compression, physics simulation, and single-threaded tests. The 45.1% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 42% lead in PassMark find prime numbers highlight its superior per-core execution. The desktop chip's 33 MB shared L3 cache, compared to 24 MB on the Core 7 240H, likely contributes to its consistent advantage in cache-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core 7 240H shows its strengths in two narrow areas. Data encryption favors the mobile chip by 2%, which may reflect differences in instruction scheduling or memory access patterns. The Cinebench R15 multi-core win suggests the 10-core, 16-thread configuration can outperform the 8-core, 16-thread i7-14701E in certain legacy rendering tests. However, this advantage does not carry forward into newer Cinebench versions.

The benchmark distribution indicates the i7-14701E is better suited for compute-heavy tasks such as 3D rendering, physics simulation, and cryptographic workloads. The Core 7 240H, despite having more physical cores, delivers competitive results only in encryption and one specific rendering test. For general productivity, the i7-14701E's margins in integer math and data compression make it the more capable processor.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and use Intel's 10 nm process node. The Core 7 240H is built on the Raptor Lake-H codename and belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename with the same generation label. Despite the shared architecture, their physical designs differ substantially.

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its thermal design power is 45 watts, reflecting its mobile market segment. The i7-14701E uses 8 cores and 16 threads, runs at a 2.60 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost, and draws 65 watts as a desktop part. The i7-14701E's die size is listed at 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 7 240H.

Cache hierarchies differ in the L3 portion. Both chips use 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core, but the i7-14701E has 33 MB shared L3 versus 24 MB on the Core 7 240H. This 9 MB difference is significant for workloads that benefit from larger last-level caches.

Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configurations. The i7-14701E adds ECC memory support, while the Core 7 240H does not. PCIe connectivity diverges, with the i7-14701E offering 16 CPU lanes on Gen 5 versus 8 lanes on the Core 7 240H. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, while the i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770.

The socket and form factor separate these parts entirely. The Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744 and targets mobile systems, while the i7-14701E uses Intel Socket 1700 for desktop builds. The Core 7 240H was released on 2024-12-17 with a launch MSRP of $502. The i7-14701E shipped earlier on 2024-06-30 with no recorded launch MSRP. Both are active production parts and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores versus 8 on the Intel Core i7-14701E. Both support 16 threads.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between these CPUs?

A: The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the i7-14701E scores 3133 versus 1719, a 45.1% advantage.

Q: Does the Core 7 240H win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins data encryption (15155 vs 14862, a 2% edge) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (2360 vs 2237, a 5.5% advantage).

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both use 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core. The i7-14701E has 33 MB shared L3, while the Core 7 240H has 24 MB shared L3.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory. The Core 7 240H does not.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Core 7 240H boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the i7-14701E boosts to 5.40 GHz.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear separation between these two processors. The Intel Core i7-14701E wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests and holds a 5.5% higher average benchmark score (33206 vs 31483). Its advantages span single-core performance, multi-core rendering in modern Cinebench versions, physics computation, and math workloads. The desktop chip also provides more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8), larger L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB), and ECC memory support.

The Intel Core 7 240H offers two narrow wins: data encryption and Cinebench R15 multi-core. Its 10-core configuration does not translate into broad multi-threaded superiority, as the i7-14701E leads in every other multi-threaded test. The mobile chip's 45-watt TDP and BGA socket target portable systems, whereas the i7-14701E uses 65 watts and Socket 1700 for desktop platforms.

Given the recorded data, the i7-14701E is the stronger processor for rendering, simulation, and compute-intensive tasks. The Core 7 240H remains a viable mobile option with competitive encryption performance and a lower thermal envelope, but it trails the desktop part in nearly every measured metric. Selection should depend on platform requirements: mobile integration points to the Core 7 240H, while desktop performance leans decisively toward the i7-14701E.