Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

Intel Core 7 240H and Intel Core 7 253PTE are both 10-core Intel parts, but they target different platforms and deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The 240H is a mobile processor for laptops, while the 253PTE is a desktop processor. Benchmark results show the 253PTE wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, while the 240H takes 4. The 253PTE also holds a higher average benchmark score of 34962 against 31483 for the 240H, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs compared to 82nd for the 240H.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PTE dominates in modern multi-threaded rendering workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21276 is 25.9% ahead of the 240H's 15764. The gap is even larger in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the 253PTE scores 3003 versus 1719, a 42.8% advantage. This makes the 253PTE the clear choice for CPU-bound creative work and applications that rely on high-frequency single-thread performance.

The 240H counters in a few specific areas. It wins Cinebench R15 multicore with 2360 against 2144, a 10.1% margin. It also leads in PassMark physics (1723 versus 1318, 30.7% ahead), PassMark find prime numbers (102 versus 82, 24.4% ahead), and PassMark random string sorting (28866 versus 28227, 2.3% ahead). These wins suggest the 240H retains an advantage in certain legacy or latency-sensitive workloads, despite its lower overall average score.

The 253PTE also takes every PassMark math and general throughput test except the three noted above. It leads in floating point math by 12.4%, integer math by 32.8%, multithread by 4.2%, data compression by 1.5%, data encryption by 2.2%, and extended instructions by 1.2%. Single-thread PassMark scores are nearly identical: 3794 for the 253PTE versus 3782 for the 240H, a 0.3% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The 240H uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, belonging to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The 253PTE uses Bartlett Lake architecture with the Bartlett Lake codename. Both are built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. Both have 10 cores, but the 240H supports 16 threads while the 253PTE supports 20 threads. That extra thread count on the 253PTE helps explain its multicore advantage in Cinebench R23 and PassMark integer math.

Cache configurations also differ. Each core has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 on both parts. The shared L3 cache is 24 MB on the 240H and 33 MB on the 253PTE, a 9 MB difference that favors the desktop part.

Clock speeds show a trade-off. The 240H has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz against 1.80 GHz for the 253PTE, but the 253PTE boosts higher to 5.40 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. Both have a 45 W TDP.

Platform features diverge. The 240H uses Intel BGA 1744 socket and is a mobile part. The 253PTE uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part. The 240H has 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), while the 253PTE has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the 240H has Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, while the 253PTE has UHD Graphics 730. ECC memory support is present on the 253PTE but not on the 240H. Memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s for the 253PTE, while no figure is recorded for the 240H.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has an average benchmark score of 34962, which is higher than the 31483 recorded for the Intel Core 7 240H.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The 253PTE scores 21276 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 25.9% higher than the 240H's 15764.

Q: Does the 240H win any multicore benchmarks?

A: Yes, the 240H wins Cinebench R15 multicore with a score of 2360, beating the 253PTE's 2144 by 10.1%.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance?

A: The 253PTE leads in Cinebench R23 single-core by 42.8% (3003 versus 1719) and in Cinebench R20 single-core by 4.2% (1261 versus 1208). PassMark single-thread scores are nearly equal at 3794 versus 3782.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The 253PTE has 20 threads, while the 240H has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The 253PTE supports ECC memory, but the 240H does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 240H | Intel Core 7 253PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base clock | 2.50 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Bartlett Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | Not recorded | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 64EU | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | $502 | $384 |

| Part number | SRQ6TQ5ML | SA4QK |

Identical fields include 10 cores, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 45 W TDP, 10 nm process, Intel foundry, and an unlocked multiplier set to false on both.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single advantage belongs to the 253PTE in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its score of 3003 beats the 240H's 1719 by 42.8%. That is a massive gap for a single-thread test and indicates a substantial difference in per-core efficiency or boost behavior.

Cinebench R23 multicore also favors the 253PTE heavily. The 253PTE scores 21276 against 15764, a 25.9% margin. The extra 4 threads and larger L3 cache likely contribute to this result. The 253PTE also wins Cinebench R20 multicore by 4.2% (8935 versus 8562) and Cinebench R20 single-core by 4.2% (1261 versus 1208).

The 253PTE's biggest PassMark win is integer math. It scores 119552 versus 80396 for the 240H, a 32.8% advantage. Floating point math also goes to the 253PTE at 67209 versus 58905, a 12.4% lead. PassMark multithread favors the 253PTE by 4.2% (25031 versus 23975). Smaller wins for the 253PTE appear in data compression (1.5%), data encryption (2.2%), and extended instructions (1.2%).

The 240H has its own notable victories. PassMark physics shows the 240H at 1723 versus 1318 for the 253PTE, a 30.7% lead. PassMark find prime numbers goes to the 240H by 24.4% (102 versus 82). Cinebench R15 multicore favors the 240H by 10.1% (2360 versus 2144). Random string sorting goes to the 240H by 2.3% (28866 versus 28227). Cinebench R15 single-core is the only test where the 240H loses by a wide margin; the 253PTE wins 302 to 249, a 17.5% difference.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 253PTE is the stronger processor overall. Its average benchmark score of 34962 places it 11% above the 240H's 31483. It wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, including the most demanding modern workloads in Cinebench R23 and PassMark integer math. The 253PTE also offers ECC memory support, 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and a larger 33 MB L3 cache, all useful for desktop workstation use. Its launch MSRP of $384 is lower than the 240H's $502.

The Intel Core 7 240H remains relevant for specific cases. It wins Cinebench R15 multicore, PassMark physics, find prime numbers, and random string sorting. Its higher base clock of 2.50 GHz and mobile platform make it a reasonable fit for laptop designs where the 253PTE cannot be installed. The 240H also includes Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, which is a more capable integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 730 found on the 253PTE.

The data indicates the 253PTE for desktop builds prioritizing rendering, math throughput, and single-thread responsiveness. The 240H for mobile systems where its socket, integrated graphics, and legacy benchmark strengths matter more.