Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 7 253PE wins every single recorded test against the Intel Core 7 240H. Across 17 head-to-head comparisons, the 253PE takes all 17, with the 240H recording zero wins. The margin varies widely depending on the workload, from modest single-thread gains to massive multi-thread leads.

The largest single gap appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the 253PE scores 3512 versus the 240H's 1719, a delta of -51.1% (meaning the 240H trails by over half). This is a decisive single-thread advantage. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a similarly substantial gap: 24880 for the 253PE against 15764 for the 240H, a -36.6% difference. In absolute terms, that is over 9000 points of additional multi-thread performance.

Cinebench R20 tells the same story. In multi-core, the 253PE posts 10449 versus 8562, a -18.1% delta. Single-core R20 shows 1475 against 1208, also -18.1%. Cinebench R15 multi-core is closer: 2507 versus 2360, a -5.9% gap, but the R15 single-core test reveals a -29.7% difference (354 versus 249).

PassMark results confirm the pattern across a variety of workloads. The integer math test shows 114158 for the 253PE versus 80396 for the 240H, a -29.6% delta. Floating point math: 80870 versus 58905, a -27.2% gap. Extended instructions: 21806 versus 16897, -22.5%. Data compression: 339133 versus 271774, -19.9%. Data encryption: 18385 versus 15155, -17.6%. Prime number finding: 138 versus 102, -26.1%. Random string sorting: 32777 versus 28866, -11.9%.

The multi-thread PassMark score shows 29271 for the 253PE against 23975 for the 240H, a -18.1% delta. Physics: 1845 versus 1723, a -6.6% gap. The narrowest margin in the entire dataset is single-thread PassMark, where the 253PE scores 3955 versus 3782, a -4.4% delta. Even the closest test still favors the 253PE.

Where Each One Wins

The 253PE wins everywhere, but the shape of its advantage matters. In single-thread tests, the 253PE is far ahead, especially in Cinebench R23 single-core where it nearly doubles the 240H's score. This suggests a significant clock speed or IPC advantage that benefits lightly threaded applications, such as everyday desktop responsiveness, web browsing, and older games that rely on one or two fast cores.

The multi-thread results are also strongly in favor of the 253PE. The 20-thread count versus the 240H's 16 threads, combined with a higher boost clock, delivers a large lead in rendering, video encoding, and compilation workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core gap of 36.6% is particularly relevant for content creation tasks that scale across all cores.

The 240H, despite losing every test, is not without its niche. As a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, it is designed for laptops where power draw and thermal output are constrained. The 253PE is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, which means it can sustain higher performance but requires a more robust cooling solution and a desktop platform. For a mobile user who needs moderate multi-thread performance in a thin chassis, the 240H remains a valid choice, but the benchmark data shows it is clearly slower in every measured metric.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several core specifications but diverge on key architectural points. Both have 10 cores and 10 nm process nodes manufactured by Intel, and both use the same L1 cache configuration of 80 KB per core and L2 cache of 2 MB per core. The base clock is identical at 2.50 GHz.

The differences begin with thread count. The 240H has 16 threads, while the 253PE has 20 threads. This indicates a different core layout, likely with more efficiency cores in the 253PE. The boost clock also differs: the 240H reaches 5.20 GHz, while the 253PE boosts to 5.50 GHz.

The L3 cache is significantly larger on the 253PE: 33 MB shared versus 24 MB shared on the 240H. This additional cache can improve performance in workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

The architecture names differ. The 240H is built on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename from the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename from the Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The 253PE has no explicit architecture field in the database, but its codename places it in a newer generation.

Memory support is similar: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The 253PE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 240H has no recorded bandwidth figure. Notably, the 253PE supports ECC memory, while the 240H does not.

PCIe connectivity differs substantially. The 240H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the 253PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This doubles the available PCIe lanes for the desktop part, which matters for high-bandwidth devices like GPUs and NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics also differ. The 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics with 64 execution units, a more capable integrated GPU. The 253PE uses UHD Graphics 730, which is a more basic solution. For systems relying solely on integrated graphics, the 240H has an advantage, though this is not reflected in the CPU benchmark scores.

Sockets differ as well: the 240H uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile socket, while the 253PE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop LGA socket. The 240H is classified as a Mobile market segment part, while the 253PE is Desktop.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE is faster in every multi-threaded benchmark. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 24880 for the 253PE versus 15764 for the 240H, a 36.6% lead. PassMark multi-thread shows 29271 versus 23975, an 18.1% lead.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The 253PE leads in all single-thread tests. The largest gap is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the 253PE scores 3512 versus 1719, a 51.1% advantage. The smallest gap is in PassMark single-thread, where the 253PE scores 3955 versus 3782, a 4.4% lead.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Both have 10 cores. The 240H has 16 threads, while the 253PE has 20 threads. This means the 253PE supports more concurrent threads.

Q: What are the boost clock differences?

A: The 240H has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 253PE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The base clock is the same for both at 2.50 GHz.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory. The 253PE additionally supports ECC memory, which the 240H does not. The 253PE also records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The 253PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The 240H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the 253PE twice the PCIe lane count.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Intel Core 7 253PE is the superior processor in raw performance. It wins all 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 4.4% to 51.1%. The average benchmark score confirms this: the 253PE sits at 40557, against 31483 for the 240H. The 253PE also holds a higher percentile ranking at 87 versus 82.

The 253PE delivers a decisive single-thread advantage, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. Its multi-thread lead is also substantial, particularly in Cinebench R23 where the 36.6% gap reflects strong scaling across its 20 threads. The larger 33 MB L3 cache and higher 5.50 GHz boost clock are likely contributors to this performance edge.

The 240H is a mobile part, and its 45 W TDP reflects that design goal. It uses a soldered BGA 1744 socket and integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 64 EU, making it a better fit for thin laptops where power efficiency and integrated graphics quality are priorities. However, the benchmark data shows no performance scenario where the 240H comes out ahead.

For a desktop builder selecting between these two, the 253PE is the clear performance pick. Its 65 W TDP, Socket 1700 compatibility, 16 PCIe lanes, and ECC memory support make it a more capable desktop processor. The 240H remains relevant only in its mobile context, where its lower TDP and better integrated GPU are practical advantages, but the recorded benchmarks show it trails the 253PE in every measured workload.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ:

| Field | Intel Core 7 240H | Intel Core 7 253PE |

|-------|-------------------|---------------------|

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | False | True |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 64EU | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | $502 | $384 |

| Part Number | SRQ6TQ5ML | SA4QE |